Quote:
Originally Posted by
hattonthehammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
I like Dimbleby, on the whole he is pretty impartial and does pipe up when the politicians start to evade or meander.
It's obviously going to be a Tory government in next, and there is no doubt that immigration is an issue that needs to be tackled. I don't understand why immigration has been allowed to run so rampant without full checks and controls. I often compare how things are here with how they are back home and the difference is night and day. I was reading somewhere that it is estimated that 2 million of London's 7 million people were not even born in the UK. Those are crazy numbers, you would struggle to find 200,000 non-native residents in all of Seoul. And that has upwards of 15 million people.
Such massive change is bound to create upheaval if not fully planned and catered for and it all seems to be coming to fruition now, with a lot of unrest on the way. It all makes for curious viewing on the sidelines. Immigration must be tackled really, I can't see how it can be ignored any longer.
The dangers of the impending welcoming into the EU were there for all too see and
the torys and lib dems did genuinely do their upmost to warn of the inpending mass flocking to the country by polish and eastern european migrants looking for work.
The majority of these apparent "unwanted visitors" are hard working, law abiding people who put many working class brits to shame. But mass migration coupled with mass unemployment go hand in hand im afraid and the end result is the British National Party!!
Lol, no they didn't. The torys are the reason we're in Europe to begin with, but trust me no major political party would've operated a different system over the past decade, particularly not the torys for one reason. It was good for the businesses, it gave them some nice cheap labour. The recession has already led to many returning back to eastern europe. Labour sold the working-class of all colours out because of Blair's obsession of helping out big businesses. Immigrants from Europe were more cost-effective.
As for Miles point that I emboldened, that figure is deceiving, as it includes a large number of people who have been living in Britain for up to 50 years. Let's put it in perspective, the largest groups are Indians, Irish, Bangladeshi, Jamaicans & Nigerians, all of whom have had significant communities for up to 30 years. All of those bar Ireland are also outside the EU, so have huge restriction on their immigration levels.
The countries that have more recently seen a sharp rise in immigration numbers to London are Americans, South Africans, Australians, Somalians & Germans. The numbers are largely as a result of London's time as the financial capital of the world (although all still controlled in New York, go figure :confused:), as a number of corporations brought in employees from different offices from around the world. Obviously there's not too many branches of JP Morgan in Mogadishu, so that doesn't explain that, although that is likely a result of the conflict there in the 90s. 75% of London is British born, which is not that shocking considering its status as a major world city. In comparison, only 64% of New York is US born. Hell, if anything pisses me off about London, it's all the 'immigrants' coming for jobs from Somerset, Hampshire & other Middle England hell-holes. Seriously, get an economy going in Cheltenham & fuck off ;D