Breidis Prescott vs Kevin Mitchell

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Otley

WOW...what i saw was Mitchell running away for the first 4 rounds....then Mitchell winning the mid rounds cause Prescott was getting frustrated by Mitchell running like a scared WASHER WOMEN and then Prescott catching Mitchell up in the later rounds when Mitchell started fighting like a MAN.......this is what I saw....and I think it didn't help listening to Darke & Watts sucking up to a UK fighter and slagging off Prescott....these commentators should go work for HBO...so biased....its really BAD


Job Biscuit (And I only had 4 cans...but feeling tired right now)!!!


eh eh!!

---

But Breidis Prescott didn't land jack shit though. Kevin Mitchell landed all the eye catching punches, he made it his kind of fight. And he outlanded Breidis Prescott by atleast double, except for a cagey opening. Kevin Mitchell tactically dominated this fight.

I think sometimes the commentary plays tricks on what's really happening....and last nite was a great example of this....I suggest next time turn off the SKY PPV commentators and you might see a different fight.....its a level of brain washing and I think its working with some people. There biased views of the fight was getting to me so I turned it off.....Especially HBO commentary is probably the WORST I have heard and I now mute them.


Job Biscuit (I will watch the fight again but I don't think my score card will change significantly to what I saw last night)!!!

eh eh!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Otley

I think sometimes the commentary plays tricks on what's really happening....and last nite was a great example of this....I suggest next time turn off the SKY PPV commentators and you might see a different fight.....its a level of brain washing and I think its working with some people. There biased views of the fight was getting to me so I turned it off.....Especially HBO commentary is probably the WORST I have heard and I now mute them.


Job Biscuit (I will watch the fight again but I don't think my score card will change significantly to what I saw last night)!!!

eh eh!!!

---

No one thinks the fight was even debatable only you do, we can't all be wrong :-\

All Mitchell did was run round ring did he really do enough to win?? it was all a bit dodgy to me Ref was on at Breidis from the start basically for nothing Breidis was the one pressing the action he threw loads more punches and also Jim watt was only really comenting on Kevin Mitchell. and the scores were ridiculous maybe i need to watch it again but i wouldn't have been shocked if Prescott had won.

I'm downloading the fight just now.

Will let you guys know what i thought about the fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pugilistic

I'm downloading the fight just now.

Will let you guys know what i thought about the fight.

---

OK can't wait, the anticipation is killing me. ;)

WTF?
Prescott wining...

Pierre Benoist is that you? :-\

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tysonbruno

All Mitchell did was run round ring did he really do enough to win?? it was all a bit dodgy to me Ref was on at Breidis from the start basically for nothing Breidis was the one pressing the action he threw loads more punches and also Jim watt was only really comenting on Kevin Mitchell. and the scores were ridiculous maybe i need to watch it again but i wouldn't have been shocked if Prescott had won.

---

Why am I not surprised you can't score a fight ;D

You do realise you have to land punches to score, right?

Prescott threw 400 punches - landed 40. Mitchell threw 300 - landed 100.

I watched it in the pub and did not hear the commentary and my immpression was that it was close in the fisrt half of the fight but Mitchell pulled away in the 2nd half even though Prescot looked dangerous for the 12 rounds.


Also can sombody tell me what this Joe Biscuit bullshit is all about.:mad:

I agree with Otley on couple things. Commentary was very biased. THe scores were crap also. But I wouldn't say Prescott won. I had it 115-113 Mitchell but 11-1 for Mitchell is crazy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gest12645

I agree with Otley on couple things. Commentary was very biased. THe scores were crap also. But I wouldn't say Prescott won. I had it 115-113 Mitchell but 11-1 for Mitchell is crazy

---

Mitchell did what i thought he would...Out box prescott.
Mitchell won this fight thats for sure...And even thou i dont like watt.
How can you say he's biased to british fighters,when he said david haye lost???

he was biased in this fight. I didn't say all the fights he comments

116-112 Mitchell for me, with two rounds I gave Prescott very debatable. No question Kev pissed this fight.

Can Saddo construct a Job Biscuit eh eh filter for the forum please so it doesn't appear in the threads like when we type fuck.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tysonbruno

All Mitchell did was run round ring did he really do enough to win?? it was all a bit dodgy to me Ref was on at Breidis from the start basically for nothing Breidis was the one pressing the action he threw loads more punches and also Jim watt was only really comenting on Kevin Mitchell. and the scores were ridiculous maybe i need to watch it again but i wouldn't have been shocked if Prescott had won.

---

Why am I not surprised you can't score a fight ;D

You do realise you have to land punches to score, right?

Prescott threw 400 punches - landed 40. Mitchell threw 300 - landed 100.

---

Look i know it looks like im hating on him but look at it like this many believe Froch beat Dirrell because Dirrell was to negative but he landed more than Mitchell and looked more effective than Mitchell too look at it like this had Prescott stopped chasing and stud in middle of ring then the action would have stopped. FACT.;)