is froch a champ

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-01-2009, 09:15 PM
Althugz

Re: is froch a champ

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_sacred_chilli

Quote:

Originally Posted by Althugz

Quote:

Originally Posted by skel1983

Thread of the year award goes to you my friend, have a word with one of the mod's the prize this year is a spelling and grammer book 2009 edition.

:appl:

Oh man Skel, if you're going to get at him about his spelling, then at least learn to spell "grammar" correctly yourself :vd:

To answer your question, bigshot, he's a champ by some miracle - He's been on borrowed time since he won it. Look to see him get found out against Kessler/Ward/Abraham/Taylor rematch/Direll rematch etc

P.S. Dont compare him to Lennox, that's a serious insult.

yes he is a champion as he has a belt, and we need more champions like him. so far he has proved he will fight anyone anywhere, and long may that last. joe calzaghe would have been a better quality champion if he had done that sooner. even roy jones turned down a fight with nigel benn, which i believe the offer was: in your home town, and you keep the entire purse!

If you just dont like him and think he is a poor boxer, then chill the beans, his willingness to fight anybody will soon see him dethroned. especially as he is part of the super 6.

but your comments show you have little to no respect for any of that. you are probably a hugger, but who are you hugging?

I've said in the past, the ONLY thing I do rate Froch for is fighting good competition almost immediately after becoming champ - Which was my problem with JC.

Still, does that mean he's any good? Absolutely not - Taylor done him until the 12th (and everybody has done Taylor so don't get happy over the KO), Direll got robbed regardless how ugly the fight was. The difference in speed and class was night and day.

I won't say anything more..let's just wait for his next fight.
12-01-2009, 09:22 PM
Fenster

Re: is froch a champ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Althugz

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_sacred_chilli

Quote:

Originally Posted by Althugz

Oh man Skel, if you're going to get at him about his spelling, then at least learn to spell "grammar" correctly yourself :vd:

To answer your question, bigshot, he's a champ by some miracle - He's been on borrowed time since he won it. Look to see him get found out against Kessler/Ward/Abraham/Taylor rematch/Direll rematch etc

P.S. Dont compare him to Lennox, that's a serious insult.

yes he is a champion as he has a belt, and we need more champions like him. so far he has proved he will fight anyone anywhere, and long may that last. joe calzaghe would have been a better quality champion if he had done that sooner. even roy jones turned down a fight with nigel benn, which i believe the offer was: in your home town, and you keep the entire purse!

If you just dont like him and think he is a poor boxer, then chill the beans, his willingness to fight anybody will soon see him dethroned. especially as he is part of the super 6.

but your comments show you have little to no respect for any of that. you are probably a hugger, but who are you hugging?

I've said in the past, the ONLY thing I do rate Froch for is fighting good competition almost immediately after becoming champ - Which was my problem with JC.

Still, does that mean he's any good? Absolutely not - Taylor done him until the 12th (and everybody has done Taylor so don't get happy over the KO), Direll got robbed regardless how ugly the fight was. The difference in speed and class was night and day.

I won't say anything more..let's just wait for his next fight.

Hopkins couldn't even get a win after 24 rounds let alone KO him.
12-01-2009, 10:13 PM
eagle

Re: is froch a champ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Althugz

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_sacred_chilli

yes he is a champion as he has a belt, and we need more champions like him. so far he has proved he will fight anyone anywhere, and long may that last. joe calzaghe would have been a better quality champion if he had done that sooner. even roy jones turned down a fight with nigel benn, which i believe the offer was: in your home town, and you keep the entire purse!

If you just dont like him and think he is a poor boxer, then chill the beans, his willingness to fight anybody will soon see him dethroned. especially as he is part of the super 6.

but your comments show you have little to no respect for any of that. you are probably a hugger, but who are you hugging?

I've said in the past, the ONLY thing I do rate Froch for is fighting good competition almost immediately after becoming champ - Which was my problem with JC.

Still, does that mean he's any good? Absolutely not - Taylor done him until the 12th (and everybody has done Taylor so don't get happy over the KO), Direll got robbed regardless how ugly the fight was. The difference in speed and class was night and day.

I won't say anything more..let's just wait for his next fight.

Hopkins couldn't even get a win after 24 rounds let alone KO him.

Are you honestly trying to say the Taylor that fought Froch was as good as the one that fought Hopkins? Taylor gassed and Froch took advantage of it as just about everyone Taylor fights these days does. The Taylor that fought Hopkins had far better endurance. Bhop at 45 would school Froch.

Froch gets hate cos he talks shit, the same way PBF does, Anthony Mundine does, and Vic Darchinyan does. Dont mean they are bad fighters, it just means u either love them or hate them. No doubt he takes on tough opposition, but the way he talks himself up so he should.
12-01-2009, 10:20 PM
Fenster

Re: is froch a champ

Quote:

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Althugz

I've said in the past, the ONLY thing I do rate Froch for is fighting good competition almost immediately after becoming champ - Which was my problem with JC.

Still, does that mean he's any good? Absolutely not - Taylor done him until the 12th (and everybody has done Taylor so don't get happy over the KO), Direll got robbed regardless how ugly the fight was. The difference in speed and class was night and day.

I won't say anything more..let's just wait for his next fight.

Hopkins couldn't even get a win after 24 rounds let alone KO him.

Are you honestly trying to say the Taylor that fought Froch was as good as the one that fought Hopkins? Taylor gassed and Froch took advantage of it as just about everyone Taylor fights these days does. The Taylor that fought Hopkins had far better endurance. Bhop at 45 would school Froch.

Froch gets hate cos he talks shit, the same way PBF does, Anthony Mundine does, and Vic Darchinyan does. Dont mean they are bad fighters, it just means u either love them or hate them. No doubt he takes on tough opposition, but the way he talks himself up so he should.

I'm honestly saying Hopkins didn't beat Taylor after 24 rounds let alone KO him.

Pavlik KO'd Taylor. Fact.
Froch KO'd Taylor. Fact.
Abraham KO'd Taylor. Fact.
Hopkins did not KO Taylor. Fact. Hopkins lost twice. Fact.

I'm just dealing with the facts. Fact.
12-01-2009, 10:50 PM
sumkalambay

Re: is froch a champ

hopkins ruined taylor

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page