Chris Arreola: Haye is a B--ch, fight Klitschko

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

I think there is also a limit to how many pies you can eat and still be classed as a pro athlete....

---

Well I guess the second you get into shape find a weight class make a few million dollars build a 80% + KO ratio and challenge for a world title you can be that example....

So Arreola is not the physical example of what a fighter should be that much is obvious...Instead of using that as a way for you to join in a topic why not contribute something productive....ANYTHING...At least one thing to make your time here since you began valid

---

No need to cry like a chris arreola about it....

---

Not crying you just never seem to have anything legit to say you just post wise ass comments instead of posting actual boxing debate or even put in something worth while on any post since u been here....Its like you are on suspension from ESB and need a place to feel wanted....

Your funny man routine is played out as Hayes "I'll beat the Klitschko's" talk

Anyone know what time the Arreola/Adamek fight starts at UK time and if there are any decent stream for it please?

Edit - 4.15ish.

Says 3am on WilliamHill and Ladbrokes? So I'd have said 3:15...boxing isn't the bookies speciality, though, especially when a UK fighter isn't involved, so it could well be 4am. Will check some streams in 10 mins nonetheless.

Ah, ignore that...it has all future fights overseas in America for 3am but main events are usually 4 onwards, so you're right ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ukboxingwatcher

Says 3am on WilliamHill and Ladbrokes? So I'd have said 3:15...boxing isn't the bookies speciality, though, especially when a UK fighter isn't involved, so it could well be 4am. Will check some streams in 10 mins nonetheless.

Ah, ignore that...it has all future fights overseas in America for 3am but main events are usually 4 onwards, so you're right ;)

---

I had to check HBO and then convert UK time into ET time. Turns out it starts on HBO at 11.15pm which is 4.15am over here. Luckily I am working nights so I have no excuse not to be up so early/late for it. ;D

Ah I see, it's a pain they don't state GMT as well, thanks for confirming the time though, I'll probably tune in if I can find a stream and I'm still awake. Quite an insomaniac :rolleyes:

As I've already said, Arreola needs to get into some sort of shape. If he was lean and well trained he would be a lot faster and would not be getting frustrated by not being able to land on a former LHW who is outboxing him.

Haye would knock Arreola out cold. He'd just be too much of a sitting target for Haye who is a much faster, harder hitting and altogether better boxer than Adamek.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

As I've already said, Arreola needs to get into some sort of shape. If he was lean and well trained he would be a lot faster and would not be getting frustrated by not being able to land on a former LHW who is outboxing him.

Haye would knock Arreola out cold. He'd just be too much of a sitting target for Haye who is a much faster, harder hitting and altogether better boxer than Adamek.

---

I think Haye beats them both as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

Well I guess the second you get into shape find a weight class make a few million dollars build a 80% + KO ratio and challenge for a world title you can be that example....

So Arreola is not the physical example of what a fighter should be that much is obvious...Instead of using that as a way for you to join in a topic why not contribute something productive....ANYTHING...At least one thing to make your time here since you began valid

---

No need to cry like a chris arreola about it....

---

Not crying you just never seem to have anything legit to say you just post wise ass comments instead of posting actual boxing debate or even put in something worth while on any post since u been here....Its like you are on suspension from ESB and need a place to feel wanted....

Your funny man routine is played out as Hayes "I'll beat the Klitschko's" talk

---

And I think you're being far to quick to play the 'he's ducking him routine'. And the fact that you jump on the band wagon of a fat farsical heavyweight who is on the way out and desperate for any kind of media coverage shows that.

I'm just joining in the joke of it all.

How did Cissy arreola get on last night? if it's bad news remember, you've always got kirk johnson ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

And I think you're being far to quick to play the 'he's ducking him routine'. And the fact that you jump on the band wagon of a fat farsical heavyweight who is on the way out and desperate for any kind of media coverage shows that.

I'm just joining in the joke of it all.

How did Cissy arreola get on last night? if it's bad news remember, you've always got kirk johnson ;D

---

....yeah the guy has only been a heavyweight for 2 years and he's only been calling out the Klitschko's well before that time and he's only backed out of 2-3 fights vs the Klitschko's so yeah I totally see your point Hornfinger.





....drink that Kool Aid buddy!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

And I think you're being far to quick to play the 'he's ducking him routine'. And the fact that you jump on the band wagon of a fat farsical heavyweight who is on the way out and desperate for any kind of media coverage shows that.

I'm just joining in the joke of it all.

How did Cissy arreola get on last night? if it's bad news remember, you've always got kirk johnson ;D

---

....yeah the guy has only been a heavyweight for 2 years and he's only been calling out the Klitschko's well before that time and he's only backed out of 2-3 fights vs the Klitschko's so yeah I totally see your point Hornfinger.





....drink that Kool Aid buddy!

---

No one has EVER had an injury in the history of the sport have they lyle?

And tell me lyle how many heavyweights win a title with in their first two year of being a heavyweight? Did arreola?

Haye hasn't ducked anyone yet. So stop wetting yourself, and stop clutching at straws.

I understand about your upset about fatty arreola losing.... again... and having to resort to slagging off haye to get some column inches but remember. don't be upset you've still got Kirk Johnson!!!

BTW... Was he a champion within his first 2 years fighting as a heavyweight?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

No need to cry like a chris arreola about it....

---

Not crying you just never seem to have anything legit to say you just post wise ass comments instead of posting actual boxing debate or even put in something worth while on any post since u been here....Its like you are on suspension from ESB and need a place to feel wanted....

Your funny man routine is played out as Hayes "I'll beat the Klitschko's" talk

---

And I think you're being far to quick to play the 'he's ducking him routine'. And the fact that you jump on the band wagon of a fat farsical heavyweight who is on the way out and desperate for any kind of media coverage shows that.

I'm just joining in the joke of it all.

How did Cissy arreola get on last night? if it's bad news remember, you've always got kirk johnson ;D

---

As far as Arreola goes I am in full agreement about things concerning his build...I mean he does not have to be firm as a Sealy but shit man a bit more effort....I am not on his bandwagon stupid ass.......If you knew much about anything around here other then smart ass comments all the time you would know who backs what fighters etc...

EG- Lyle is a Klitschko fan...Pac Straight is a Pac fan and so on....

The only HW who I sing praises of is Retired and is on my avatar....

My point was Arreola will fight anyone...he does not spend 2 yrs shit talking then finding ways to maneuver around the bout is/was my point but obviously you can't get a simple point through your head.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

No one has EVER had an injury in the history of the sport have they lyle?

And tell me lyle how many heavyweights win a title with in their first two year of being a heavyweight? Did arreola?

Haye hasn't ducked anyone yet. So stop wetting yourself, and stop clutching at straws.

I understand about your upset about fatty arreola losing.... again... and having to resort to slagging off haye to get some column inches but remember. don't be upset you've still got Kirk Johnson!!!

BTW... Was he a champion within his first 2 years fighting as a heavyweight?

---

Injury, yeah people get injured, but none more than your buddy who has recently had: back trouble, a broken hand, a cut from sparring, and sand in his vagina.

Arreola didn't talk half as much shit in his first two years as a heavyweight AND as the fans of the WBA chump have so adamantly argued, he was THE cruiserweight champion (if you discount Steve Cunningham who had a belt during that guy's reign as well) so he was a "world class boxer" before setting foot in the heavyweight division and ALL of the supporters of that fighter said he should get an IMMEDIATE shot at Wladimir just based on what he did at cruiserweight.

I'm not clutching at straws the FACT is that your boy had 2 (really more like 3) opportunities to make a Klitschko fight happen and each time YOUR BOY has shat himself and ran away to hide behind the skirt of the WBA and Golden Boy.

I'm not upset about Arreola losing, he's brave and all but he's a lazy boxer. Arreola has good boxing skill but refuses to use it and only wants to outslug his opponent which as he has surely figured out he can't do that vs everyone. Arreola understands the whole point of talking shit as a prize fighter is to show you can back it up......your boy has not delivered, not even close. Yeah he has a belt but he beat the weakest title holder there was.

Watching last night's fight I was pretty sure Haye wouldn't get in the ring with Arreola, unless he was deploying the same strategy as against Valuev (run like hell).

However, Haye-Adamek would be a very interesting fight--2 former cruiser champs goin at it. Will Haye take it? I suppose he's supposed to either fight Valuev or the winner of Meehan-Chagaev first though?

Re. Arreola, if he was 10 pounds lighter and in better condition he may well have knocked Adamek out in Round 5. Just and if at this point, since it could be a long time before Arreola gets another shot at the big-time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ludwig

Watching last night's fight I was pretty sure Haye wouldn't get in the ring with Arreola, unless he was deploying the same strategy as against Valuev (run like hell).

However, Haye-Adamek would be a very interesting fight--2 former cruiser champs goin at it. Will Haye take it? I suppose he's supposed to either fight Valuev or the winner of Meehan-Chagaev first though?

Re. Arreola, if he was 10 pounds lighter and in better condition he may well have knocked Adamek out in Round 5. Just and if at this point, since it could be a long time before Arreola gets another shot at the big-time.

---

Good assessment...
Welcome to the forums

People shouldn't confuse good footwork and movement with running. Those are the sort of comments I expect from simpletons who have never stepped inside a ring.