Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.
Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).
you talk like froch is easy to beat
one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement
ignore fenster
other than ice he is the sites froch hater
Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
I never said Froch was easy to beat. I like him.
But the fact is he was decked by Taylor, stunned by Dirrell, shook by Kessler and Pascal and rocked by Aussie Sheep farmer Dale Westerman, so how anyone can possibly think he's gonna walk through Arthur Abraham's bombs i'll never know.
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.
Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).
you talk like froch is easy to beat
one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement
ignore fenster
other than ice he is the sites froch hater
Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
How ridiculous.
Froch, with his shitty defense, wouldn't make it past one round against Pacster. Fact.
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
YAWN!!!!!!!
More blatant froch hating on this site i see, and would you believe its the very same ones who choose to hate on the likes of ortiz, khan, de-gale etc
froch whopped dirrell - dirrell whooped abraham
how do we possibly come to the conclusion that abraham whoops froch??
im not licking his bum or anything but the man has a point
Thats one way of looking at it but on the other hand you could say Abraham knocked Dirrell spark out and Dirrel handed Carl a boxing lesson so how can anyone give Carl a hope in this fight especially when Dirrell who has been in with both men thinks Abraham wins this one early.
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Lol, what's the difference then?
...and whatever you think about the outcome of that fiight there was no "Whopping" or "Whipping" by anybody
Whipping is what gay american boys do to each other and whopping is what froch did to dirrell
are you english?
:rolleyes:
and you think that dirrell didnt get a whopping? pretty wierd
do you wear a baseball cap back to front anytime?
Pretty weird that I don't think a fighter got "A Whopping" in a fight that most boxing writers and approx 65% of people on this site think the other guy one :confused: I could make a case for Froch winning (although I don't think he did) but a "Whopping" LMAO
I'm like Fenster a complete patriot, but I'm also realistic. The only person who's judgement is clouded is yours fella.
You at HTH need to get a room ;D
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Lol, what's the difference then?
...and whatever you think about the outcome of that fiight there was no "Whopping" or "Whipping" by anybody
Whipping is what gay american boys do to each other and whopping is what froch did to dirrell
are you english?
Do you mean whupping?
What the fuck is whopping?
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
I never said Froch was easy to beat. I like him.
But the fact is he was decked by Taylor, stunned by Dirrell, shook by Kessler and Pascal and rocked by Aussie Sheep farmer Dale Westerman, so how anyone can possibly think he's gonna walk through Arthur Abraham's bombs i'll never know.
people keep saying this stunned by dirrell, i dont remember that happening, i dont remember him shook by pascal or kessler either
but it seems to me you do have something against the dude
an englishman hating an englishman because he has found some success why are englishmen so stoopid?
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.
Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).
you talk like froch is easy to beat
one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement
ignore fenster
other than ice he is the sites froch hater
Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
How ridiculous.
Froch, with his shitty defense, wouldn't make it past one round against Pacster. Fact.
Ice said that he himself could go the distance with pac
you really think pac would beat froch? jeees man what is wrong with people?
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
YAWN!!!!!!!
More blatant froch hating on this site i see, and would you believe its the very same ones who choose to hate on the likes of ortiz, khan, de-gale etc
froch whopped dirrell - dirrell whooped abraham
how do we possibly come to the conclusion that abraham whoops froch??
im not licking his bum or anything but the man has a point
Thats one way of looking at it but on the other hand you could say Abraham knocked Dirrell spark out and
Dirrel handed Carl a boxing lesson so how can anyone give Carl a hope in this fight especially when Dirrell who has been in with both men thinks Abraham wins this one early.
If your interpretation of a boxing lesson is running around for 12rounds and falling on the floor at every opportunity then yes your right
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Pretty weird that I don't think a fighter got "A Whopping" in a fight that most boxing writers and approx 65% of people on this site think the other guy one :confused: I could make a case for Froch winning (although I don't think he did) but a "Whopping" LMAO
I'm like Fenster a complete patriot, but I'm also realistic. The only person who's judgement is clouded is yours fella.
You at HTH need to get a room ;D
please refer to my previous post about englishmen hating englishmen
its pretty sickly dudes
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Pretty weird that I don't think a fighter got "A Whopping" in a fight that most boxing writers and approx 65% of people on this site think the other guy one :confused: I could make a case for Froch winning (although I don't think he did) but a "Whopping" LMAO
I'm like Fenster a complete patriot, but I'm also realistic. The only person who's judgement is clouded is yours fella.
You at HTH need to get a room ;D
please refer to my previous post about englishmen hating englishmen
its pretty sickly dudes
The only British fighter I have ever wanted to lose EVER is Audley Harrison. If you had been around a bit longer you might know a bit more about the people you are judging.
Your problem is that you can't be objective about a British fighter.
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.
Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).
you talk like froch is easy to beat
one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement
ignore fenster
other than ice he is the sites froch hater
Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
How ridiculous.
Froch, with his shitty defense, wouldn't make it past one round against Pacster. Fact.
Ice said that he himself could go the distance with pac
you really think pac would beat froch? jeees man what is wrong with people?
Disappearing up your own ass fast mate
It's called a irony
P.S I've edited your post, don't be calling people that on the main forum, theis aint Doghouse boxing ;)
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Pretty weird that I don't think a fighter got "A Whopping" in a fight that most boxing writers and approx 65% of people on this site think the other guy one :confused: I could make a case for Froch winning (although I don't think he did) but a "Whopping" LMAO
I'm like Fenster a complete patriot, but I'm also realistic. The only person who's judgement is clouded is yours fella.
You at HTH need to get a room ;D
please refer to my previous post about englishmen hating englishmen
its pretty sickly dudes
The only British fighter I have ever wanted to lose EVER is Audley Harrison. If you had been around a bit longer you might know a bit more about the people you are judging.
Your problem is that you can't be objective about a British fighter.
ha, i cant be objective?
you have a clear dislike for him, virtually all your posts have been against him, half of which isnt really true
he was rocked by this guy and wobbled by that, hes slow, etc etc
you refer to one post where you think that I havent been objective about froch (or any other boxer for that matter)
dude, froch has lost once in twenty odd fights, he has a fantastic knockout record, every fight he has been in has been more than entertaining (appart from the dirrell fight through no fault of his own), he makes the build up to fights exciting with his persona, he is fantastic for boxing, he is english and i am damn proud to say that and so should you be
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HattonTheHammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.
Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).
you talk like froch is easy to beat
one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement
ignore fenster
other than ice he is the sites froch hater
Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac
Uhh no i said i could possibly last 9 minutes, maybe i couldn't maybe i could. Who cares whats that got to do with anything ?
And why are you licking up HTH's ass ? are you the same person ? because you both act very alike.
Infact i know the MOD's may edit this comment which is fine, but i think your both a bunch of wind up merchants, if its not HTH on two accounts.
You both are totally clueless, and say any old rubbish. To get a rise out of people, honestly its like you two are from totally different planets.
Audley Harrison can beat the Klitschko brothers, Carl Froch whooped Dirrell/Kessler. And Carl Froch was ahead going into the last round vs Jermain Taylor ?
Are you kidding me ? do you actually believe this crap you spout out ?
Im not a hater of Carl Froch at all, i think he's exciting fighter and is willing to fight anybody. But just because he's British i don't totally erase his flaws from my mind, and claim any old bullshit like HTH does.
The fact is many people believe he lost to Andre Dirrell, Carl Froch didn't "whoop" or "whip" anyone.
A whooping is James Toney vs Iran Barkley/Joe Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy.
Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell was a messy/untidy fight, with not alot of action. But Andre Dirrell was able to make it his kind of fight, and Carl Froch struggled to land anything meaningful and was outboxed.
Against Mikkel Kessler he was outworked/outhustled, if the fight was in any doubt. Mikkel Kessler won the last round to seal the deal, he won the fight. With a good steady body/head attack.
Against Jermain Taylor he was behind going into the 12th round by atleast 3 rounds, anybody who had Carl Froch ahead. Is a clueless moron, it was a good win for Carl Froch. But to say he didn't need a KO in the last round is utter rubbish.
Re: Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BIG H
Pretty weird that I don't think a fighter got "A Whopping" in a fight that most boxing writers and approx 65% of people on this site think the other guy one :confused: I could make a case for Froch winning (although I don't think he did) but a "Whopping" LMAO
I'm like Fenster a complete patriot, but I'm also realistic. The only person who's judgement is clouded is yours fella.
You at HTH need to get a room ;D
please refer to my previous post about englishmen hating englishmen
its pretty sickly dudes
The only British fighter I have ever wanted to lose EVER is Audley Harrison. If you had been around a bit longer you might know a bit more about the people you are judging.
Your problem is that you can't be objective about a British fighter.
ha, i cant be objective?
you have a clear dislike for him, virtually all your posts have been against him, half of which isnt really true
he was rocked by this guy and wobbled by that, hes slow, etc etc
you refer to one post where you think that I havent been objective about froch (or any other boxer for that matter)
dude, froch has lost once in twenty odd fights, he has a fantastic knockout record, every fight he has been in has been more than entertaining (appart from the dirrell fight through no fault of his own), he makes the build up to fights exciting with his persona, he is fantastic for boxing, he is english and i am damn proud to say that and so should you be
OK - Saying he "Whopped" Direll. NOBODY could objectively say either of those guys "Whopped" the other it was a dull nothing fight, there was no "Whopping"
So now you show me the posts where I talk about Froch gettled "Rocked by this guy and wobbled by this guy" Because that wasn't me that wrote that or any of the other posts. Mixing me up with Facster me thinks ;)