Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Khantucky fried chicken - Prescott
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
armyash
CLITschko x2 ;D
CLITschko x2?
there 2 of them ;)
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
I liked my conamoyor for casamayor but I got in a lot of trouble for saying that. This was to have a stab at vd for always getting at khan.
<br />
<br />
The problem with Conamoyor was it was used after the man had already been a multiple champion and had established his Hall of Fame credentials. <img src="images/smilies/vd.gif" border="0" alt="" title="vd" smilieid="340" class="inlineimg" /><br />
<br />
I personally liked <br />
<br />
Rey Bumtista<br />
Manny Pacneedle<br />
Joe Crapzaghe (I'll admit Joe made Crapzaghe mute after the Kessler fight. Thank God he provided me with Cokezaghe and Crackzaghe to take it's place)<br />
Enzo Maccraparinelli
<br />
<br />Well surely khan isn't con anymore after a string of good wins and securing the title? He's also proved he can take a dig better after maidana ! Or is he still con?
He would of been rid of it already. But the way he's shamelessly ducking Prescott while still needing an opponent makes him keep it.
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Bobby "why dont mama hug ME like that" Pacquiao ???
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Off the top of my head... That I know I've used some I came up with some I just read somewhere on here.
Izzy
PongsaShit
RuPaul Williams
JFat
Rafa
Aladdin (Naz)
Tony "PP" Margarito (Plaster of Paris)
Snaggletooth (Hopkins)
Marshmellow Man (Butterbean)
Gollum (Maussa)
Peanut Head (Tarver)
CalzSlappy (Calzaghe)
Powder (Pavlik)
Beaky Buzzard (Darchinyan)
Pernell Shitaker
Sugar Gay Leonard
Cory Stinks
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
armyash
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
armyash
CLITschko x2 ;D
CLITschko x2?
there 2 of them ;)
is there?
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
McCloskey is still a name in the UK, its just a keep busy fight and as i said before i still would watch a prescott fight. i just dont see how khans ducking him? thats a stupid comment! khans waiting for the winner of bradley alexander hes got a lot bigger fish to fry than prescott. Hes proved hes miles better than prescott with beating maidana in a war. weather the fight is murray, mcclosky or prescott khan will win. its all working towards the winner of the big fight this weekend.
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
McCloskey is still a name in the UK, its just a keep busy fight and as i said before i still would watch a prescott fight. i just dont see how khans ducking him? thats a stupid comment! khans waiting for the winner of bradley alexander hes got a lot bigger fish to fry than prescott. Hes proved hes miles better than prescott with beating maidana in a war. weather the fight is murray, mcclosky or prescott khan will win. its all working towards the winner of the big fight this weekend.
I agree with that. I don't think he's ducking him. But for me, there is more purpose to fighting Prescott than McCloskey. I'd bet more of the average joe public know who Prescott is more than McCloskey. I'd be stunned if he took the Murray fight because the fight is in Manchester and I could see Murray bringing more supporters thus making Khan the bad guy in his own back yard.
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
McCloskey is still a name in the UK, its just a keep busy fight and as i said before i still would watch a prescott fight. i just dont see how khans ducking him? thats a stupid comment! khans waiting for the winner of bradley alexander hes got a lot bigger fish to fry than prescott. Hes proved hes miles better than prescott with beating maidana in a war. weather the fight is murray, mcclosky or prescott khan will win. its all working towards the winner of the big fight this weekend.
I agree with that. I don't think he's ducking him. But for me, there is more purpose to fighting Prescott than McCloskey. I'd bet more of the average joe public know who Prescott is more than McCloskey. I'd be stunned if he took the Murray fight because the fight is in Manchester and I could see Murray bringing more supporters thus making Khan the bad guy in his own back yard.
im thinking the mcclosky fight is going to happen but yes i wouldnt mind seeing khan avenge the loss but hes not ducking him for sure. silly comment by vd just trying to have a pop at khan as always!
Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
armyash
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
armyash
CLITschko x2 ;D
CLITschko x2?
there 2 of them ;)
is there?
no