Are you for or against the monarchy?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dia bando

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I have no issues with a rich socialist. Socialism hardly means communism. If he pays his taxes and wealth is redistributed then he is being a good socialist.

I like Tony Benn, though I disagree with his religious views

---

Miles do you ever agree with any one's views, let see if I got it right you are a big tit hating/ Socialist/Tory/ Anarchist/ and you say you don't like Kev. bit of a mix there Miles.
Why can't you just be like me:angel:,;D

---

Chomsky. Miles would suck Noam off this instant if given the opportunity.

---

That would be wrong, but I do respect Chomsky's views. A very sound man.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superheavyrhun

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

Yes in regards to Australia, only because the cost of dismantling it all changing all the law papers judges regalia army navy etc etc and putting someone else in the royal position who didnt know what they are doing, could be even more costly to us than keeping her as head.

---

If you could fill me in on the special knowledge and insight that the queen has into Australian military affairs I'd be most grateful? Surely you have somebody over there who can wander around in clothes that cost about as much as it would take to properly kit out an infantry unit. The main job requirement seems to be waving and asking questions to learn more about the normal people and what their lives are like.

I believe a male hermit would be out of touch enough to have to ask basic questions about life, and would probably have forearms strong enough to wave for extended periods of time due to frequent masturbation.

---

True but shes our head of state and costs us fuck all and doesnt stick her nose in as a live in one would.

Plus if we get attacked by Indonesia, we want your asses over here fighting for us cause they outnumber us somewhat.;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Socialism doesn't work....it's been tried. It didn't work for the Nazi's, didn't work for the Soviets, and it won't work for anyone else.

If you look at the behavioral psychology of economics Capitalism is THE WAY. It encourages innovation, hard work, etc. Socialism doesn't give you incentive to work, quite the opposite actually, but you guys just never will figure that out because you're so busy hating those evil tricky rich people who stole their money and land and have handicapped the system to suit themselves.

---

The Nazis were socialist?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Socialism doesn't work....it's been tried. It didn't work for the Nazi's, didn't work for the Soviets, and it won't work for anyone else.

If you look at the behavioral psychology of economics Capitalism is THE WAY. It encourages innovation, hard work, etc. Socialism doesn't give you incentive to work, quite the opposite actually, but you guys just never will figure that out because you're so busy hating those evil tricky rich people who stole their money and land and have handicapped the system to suit themselves.

---

The Nazis were socialist?

---

I think you got that one WRONG.;D

...a bit surprised, I thought you subjects loved your Queen... a big contrast with Japan, where hardly anyone question their royalties...

anyways, I vote 'for'. So why the heck a poor fella from a third world country voting for British monarchy? that's a good question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

...a bit surprised, I thought you subjects loved your Queen... a big contrast with Japan, where hardly anyone question their royalties...

anyways, I vote 'for'. So why the heck a poor fella from a third world country voting for British monarchy? that's a good question.

---

Would you like her? With the government looking for cuts during the recession, sub-letting a queen could be useful. You'd probably get her for nothing as long as you agree to cover the private jets and the palaces.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorCharlie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dia bando

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I have no issues with a rich socialist. Socialism hardly means communism. If he pays his taxes and wealth is redistributed then he is being a good socialist.

I like Tony Benn, though I disagree with his religious views

---

Miles do you ever agree with any one's views, let see if I got it right you are a big tit hating/ Socialist/Tory/ Anarchist/ and you say you don't like Kev. bit of a mix there Miles.
Why can't you just be like me:angel:,;D

---

Chomsky. Miles would suck Noam off this instant if given the opportunity.

---

That would be wrong, but I do respect Chomsky's views. A very sound man.

---

Except when it comes to linguistics, where it turns out he is more of a naked emperor, who for generations convinced people that he was decked out in the newest and most resplendent clothes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superheavyrhun

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pacfan

...a bit surprised, I thought you subjects loved your Queen... a big contrast with Japan, where hardly anyone question their royalties...

anyways, I vote 'for'. So why the heck a poor fella from a third world country voting for British monarchy? that's a good question.

---

Would you like her? With the government looking for cuts during the recession, sub-letting a queen could be useful. You'd probably get her for nothing as long as you agree to cover the private jets and the palaces.

---

...'I wanna be a billionaire, so freakin' bad...
...sleeping next to Oprah and the Queen'...

Before you folks think dirty, I said 'next to' not 'with' and there's a heck lot difference between the two... ...just kiddin' babes...

Naw, Mr.superheavyrhun, I think I'll just take the jets and the palaces... Seriously, is it that bad? If the royalties lose respect from their loyal subjects, then it's time for abolision or abdication or whatever you call it. In the first place, that's what they are for right, to unite their people and the country. It's just that from an outsider far away, Great Britain is known for it's monarchy more than anything else so it's hard to imagine GB without the it...

80% of the British people support the monarchy. The 20% who do not are just very loud and whiny.

I think that people who call themselves "subjects" have no self respect. So I wouldn't like to live in a monarchy.
Other than that, I believe that all things considered dictatorship or authoritarian regime doesn't have to be worse for the people than democracy. Of course it's worse in some aspects but in some it can be superior.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by therealremi

I think that people who call themselves "subjects" have no self respect. So I wouldn't like to live in a monarchy.
Other than that, I believe that all things considered dictatorship or authoritarian regime doesn't have to be worse for the people than democracy. Of course it's worse in some aspects but in some it can be superior.

---

You have just walked in a circle whilst pulling a rope. Having passed through your own loop you have now created a knot. Good luck with untying it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

80% of the British people support the monarchy. The 20% who do not are just very loud and whiny.

---

Thanks for clearing the issue... had no idea what the real score was...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

The Nazis were socialist?

---

Yes, they were and they didn't hide it (just what NSDAP stands for)*. Their policy of coercing the people in only one right direction is similar to what present day leftists do (they call themselves "liberals" for some reason). A book was written about this - I don't like to legitimize Wikipedia by quoting it but here it is:
Liberal Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
*But they weren't communists.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greenbeanz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by therealremi

I think that people who call themselves "subjects" have no self respect. So I wouldn't like to live in a monarchy.
Other than that, I believe that all things considered dictatorship or authoritarian regime doesn't have to be worse for the people than democracy. Of course it's worse in some aspects but in some it can be superior.

---

You have just walked in a circle whilst pulling a rope. Having passed through your own loop you have now created a knot. Good luck with untying it.

---

It may seem like that. I probably wouldn't mind living under the rule of a wise dictator who is a humble person (again, a paradox of sorts). Probably, if I were born in 1930s, I would be more or less OK under the rule of general Franco in Spain.
With monarchy you have all that "subjects", aristocracy, the idea that the country is a property of a family,... really that feels humilitating.

The Queen has always seen herself as a servant of the nation. She has faithfully fulfilled her role in that capacity for 60 years. Not once in that time had she lorded it over the masses or abused her position to weild any tyrannical kind of power. People seem much more intent on humiliating her than she has ever shown in humiliating, what others, would call her subjects.