Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Yeah, he's such a sympathetic figure isn't he. The world needs to take it easy on such marvelous human beings.
Haye is a BIGGER DRAW than Fury. Anything less than 50% for him is retarded, what on earth is up for debate about this. The fight won't have anything to do with a world title or ranking, it's just a huge domestic fight.
I havent even shared an opinion on the proposed split. I don't really care and if you take what Fury says on twitter seriously then more fool you.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I only comented in here when the question of "what has Fury done" was brought up and the answer is, in the last 2 years, alot more than Haye.
Haye has had 1 fight against Furys left overs. Fury has fought 6 times and is far more current and relevant.
A fury v Klitschko fight would be far more interesting and relevant than another boring Haye v Klitschko fight.
Relevant because Fury has actualy been fighting and beating people and earnt a ranking and the interest wouldnt stop with the lead up with Fury, he would actually try to win and earn his money rather than conning all you gullible fuckers that get taken in by Haye.
For fuck sakes, he didnt even prove he was the best at cruiser. Carl Thompson can always say he would beat Haye.
Lets be honest, Thompson would probably have done the same to Mormeck and Macaranelli;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI havent even shared an opinion on the proposed split. I don't really care and if you take what Fury says on twitter seriously then more fool you.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I only comented in here when the question of "what has Fury done" was brought up and the answer is, in the last 2 years, alot more than Haye.
Haye has had 1 fight against Furys left overs. Fury has fought 6 times and is far more current and relevant.
A fury v Klitschko fight would be far more interesting and relevant than another boring Haye v Klitschko fight.
Relevant because Fury has actualy been fighting and beating people and earnt a ranking and the interest wouldnt stop with the lead up with Fury, he would actually try to win and earn his money rather than conning all you gullible fuckers that get taken in by Haye.
For fuck sakes, he didnt even prove he was the best at cruiser. Carl Thompson can always say he would beat Haye.
Lets be honest, Thompson would probably have done the same to Mormeck and Macaranelli;)
Go on then, what do you think a fair split would be? And do you think that asking for 80% is in effect ducking the fight?
I dont for one second think he is being serious with all his other shit, youd be fucking stupid to believe anything he says, especially something as far fetched as that.Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanmanQuote:
Originally Posted by rossI havent even shared an opinion on the proposed split. I don't really care and if you take what Fury says on twitter seriously then more fool you.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I only comented in here when the question of "what has Fury done" was brought up and the answer is, in the last 2 years, alot more than Haye.
Haye has had 1 fight against Furys left overs. Fury has fought 6 times and is far more current and relevant.
A fury v Klitschko fight would be far more interesting and relevant than another boring Haye v Klitschko fight.
Relevant because Fury has actualy been fighting and beating people and earnt a ranking and the interest wouldnt stop with the lead up with Fury, he would actually try to win and earn his money rather than conning all you gullible fuckers that get taken in by Haye.
For fuck sakes, he didnt even prove he was the best at cruiser. Carl Thompson can always say he would beat Haye.
Lets be honest, Thompson would probably have done the same to Mormeck and Macaranelli;)
Go on then, what do you think a fair split would be? And do you think that asking for 80% is in effect ducking the fight?
I do believe a 50/50 split is fair but I also reckon that as an ego or bragging rights thing, Fury may be pushing for slightly more in his favour, like maybe 51 in his favour.
After all, he is like Mayorga and will sell this fight single handedly. After his Cunningham performance, even though he looked vulnerable, so far this year hes been in the most exciting and talked about heavyweight fight in the world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI havent even shared an opinion on the proposed split. I don't really care and if you take what Fury says on twitter seriously then more fool you.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I only comented in here when the question of "what has Fury done" was brought up and the answer is, in the last 2 years, alot more than Haye.
Haye has had 1 fight against Furys left overs. Fury has fought 6 times and is far more current and relevant.
A fury v Klitschko fight would be far more interesting and relevant than another boring Haye v Klitschko fight.
Relevant because Fury has actualy been fighting and beating people and earnt a ranking and the interest wouldnt stop with the lead up with Fury, he would actually try to win and earn his money rather than conning all you gullible fuckers that get taken in by Haye.
For fuck sakes, he didnt even prove he was the best at cruiser. Carl Thompson can always say he would beat Haye.
Lets be honest, Thompson would probably have done the same to Mormeck and Macaranelli;)
Fair enough, I've actually never even been on Twitter;D
The thing is, neither guy has done anything in the last couple of years. Fury has been active but not against anyone really good and he's looked completely shit, because he is.
Fury will NOT sell the fight single handedly, that's nonsense. PEople take notice of him because he is an inbred freak and has absolutely no shame or context of anything before he runs his mouth. THey are both great self promoters, but Haye actually has a method to it and is a much more decent person when he isn't hyping up a fight. I'd imagine Haye is quite popular in the UK, even with many women and non boxing fans? He is a charasmatic and attractive guy, Fury as I said is the equivalent of a circus freak.
Fury would make more money fighting Haye than he would fighting four or five journeymen. He'd make far more money fighting Haye than he would fighting a Klitschko. He really is a great big girl. He deserves nothing but contempt. I've never seen a whole Tyson Fury fight and I never will now. The only way he can redeem himself is to take this fight.
The fight wont happen because Fury knows hell lose. The ONLY reason Haye is offering 50/50 split is because he knows hell win easy, and when he does, it will put him in a good sport to get a world title shot.
In all fairness Fury has nothing to negotiate with. He could probably get 5-10 million for fighting Haye. He will get less then 10% of that for fighting Osquendo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
That's what I would have guessed, but didn't feel confident stating given that I've never even been to the UK;D
It comes down to whether Furys management would rather string him along and hope to find a few ranked fighters crappy enough to actually lose to him, or just cash in on him now. It's probably a good thing for Fury he won't be able to take many good punches from either Haye or Klitschko, it'll just be an early KO and he won't have whatever the hell occupies his head completely beaten out of him.
Don't criticise Furys opponents and then praise Haye.
Who at heavy has Haye beaten that is any more dangerous than Furys opponents?
;D
ValuevQuote:
Originally Posted by ross
Oh you mean that well known boxing powerhouse broadcaster (that's free) channel 5?Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Because all the greats started their careers with the aim to be terrestrial television fighters!?!?
Channel 5 is for the shit fighters of the divisions of British boxing! Fact.
It's for the fighters that are decent, simply because the best go to sky or BN
Haye does sky, fury does channel 5
Price does sky/BN, fury does channel 5
Groves does sky, DeGale does channel 5
BJS and Ryder do sky, Eubank Jr does channel 5
Who the fuck would pay £15 to watch Fury vs Cunningham?
Haye has had 1 fight to Furys 6 fights since Haye v Wlad.
And in that one fight he probably made more money and sold out more seats than fury did in his entire 6 shitfests.
Take your 80/20 split and shove it up your poo chute!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
I'm not really sure who is doing that, but it has nothing to do with the fight in any case. This doesn't boil down to merits either way, its just the most lucrative fight for both men. The difference is Fury can't win and that is what will stop it from happening if anything.
Hahahahaha!Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeValuevQuote:
Originally Posted by ross
Ae you taking the piss? :vd:
That was the one fighter in the division that could make an ancient Holyfield look good!;D
Thats the best you can come up with and now the realisation that you've all been mugged;D:LOLATYOU:
Haye should call fury's bluff and go for winner takes all.Apart from the deluded, nobody thinks fury will take a big punch at top level.
Are you? Seriously, is every single thing you post just to troll:confused: We have all been mugged, good lord. Did your mother tap into the Fury family gene pool, is that why you are so emotionally invested here?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossHahahahaha!Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeValuevQuote:
Originally Posted by ross
Ae you taking the piss? :vd:
That was the one fighter in the division that could make an ancient Holyfield look good!;D
Thats the best you can come up with and now the realisation that you've all been mugged;D:LOLATYOU: