Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
Little child lol, I've probably got tattoos older than you.
But what's interesting is the rule I once learned during my PC Technology degree , that when someone brings up child sex abuse on a forum, that person is more likely to attempt it.
Speak volumes about you.
Then by that rational you're gay
Your turn princess
No you misunderstand the logic.
It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay :)
Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.
NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.
Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
No you misunderstand the logic.
It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay :)
Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.
NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.
Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.
You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
No you misunderstand the logic.
It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay :)
Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.
NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.
Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.
You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
I'm really bored and this is entertaining the shit outta me on what is an otherwise mundane money afternoon.
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
No you misunderstand the logic.
It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay :)
Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.
NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.
Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.
You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
I'm really bored and this is entertaining the shit outta me on what is an otherwise mundane money afternoon.
So arguments are entertaining to you......yeah, that's a little gay at the very least a feminine quality, but hey props to you for being honest and open about it
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vendettos
No you misunderstand the logic.
It's not illegal to be gay, therefore you wouldn't have to use the Internet to be gay :)
Next you'll mention the nazis, which again with someone like you is an inevitability, so see Godwin's Law before you do.
NOTE: The law states at the mention of the nazis the conversation is redundant and essentially over, so lets just assume, and go on the notion that you're an idiot and will mention the nazis sooner or later and we can end this conversation here, without furthering my decline in intellect caused by reading your posts.
Understandably I mentioned them out of context, so the conversation isn't far from dead anyways.
Legality has 0 to do with the reasoning you have attempted to use Queenie.
You mentioned Nazi's....why would you even bring them up?
I'm really bored and this is entertaining the shit outta me on what is an otherwise mundane money afternoon.
So arguments are entertaining to you......yeah, that's a little gay at the very least a feminine quality, but hey props to you for being honest and open about it
I have to say I am a married heterosexual and I am finding this thread very entertaining. On a serious note a few people here stated Wlad has good footwork. Of course you couldn't tell that from this fight but I have never seen impressive movement from him. Granted, I don't watch a lot of his fights, even when he isn't clinching for 12 rounds I still find him boring.
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
You guys that are complaining about Walds fight last night is fine it was kinda of a bad night. If were going into his whole career then you guys complaining about his holding have not seen some of the greats do it i am guessing. Ali all time great would practically hold a guys head to his dick and that was on more then one occasion. Have you guys ever seen a Hopkins fight before there are more head butts and grappling then punches yet again a great fighter clinching is a rule that is broke like ever fight.
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
You guys that are complaining about Walds fight last night is fine it was kinda of a bad night. If were going into his whole career then you guys complaining about his holding have not seen some of the greats do it i am guessing. Ali all time great would practically hold a guys head to his dick and that was on more then one occasion. Have you guys ever seen a Hopkins fight before there are more head butts and grappling then punches yet again a great fighter clinching is a rule that is broke like ever fight.
Evander Holyfield??? Never heard of him, never seen one of his fights. "Oh but it was OK if Evander clinched or made a fight ugly because he was trying to knock his opponent out with his head" :rolleyes:
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
You guys that are complaining about Walds fight last night is fine it was kinda of a bad night. If were going into his whole career then you guys complaining about his holding have not seen some of the greats do it i am guessing. Ali all time great would practically hold a guys head to his dick and that was on more then one occasion. Have you guys ever seen a Hopkins fight before there are more head butts and grappling then punches yet again a great fighter clinching is a rule that is broke like ever fight.
Evander Holyfield??? Never heard of him, never seen one of his fights. "Oh but it was OK if Evander clinched or made a fight ugly because he was trying to knock his opponent out with his head" :rolleyes:
Are you still defending that debacle that Wlad would call a boxing maul I mean match?
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Are you still defending that debacle that Wlad would call a boxing maul I mean match?
Again, like many others you said 0 about Hatton or Lewis Master.....quite telling....quite telling indeed!
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Are you still defending that debacle that Wlad would call a boxing maul I mean match?
Again, like many others you said 0 about Hatton or Lewis Master.....quite telling....quite telling indeed!
hatton held, lewis held
on the next level ward holds, Hopkins holds
many levels above, wlad holds to the extreme of extremes, there has never been and never will be a boxer considered anywhere near championship level that holds to the extreme that wlad holds, he is a disgrace and the sooner he retires the better it will be for everyone other than the corrupt cheats that are making the money from his fights
Re: THAT, was NOT "Boxing"- Klitchsko vs. Povetkin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Are you still defending that debacle that Wlad would call a boxing maul I mean match?
Again, like many others you said 0 about Hatton or Lewis Master.....quite telling....quite telling indeed!
hatton held, lewis held
on the next level ward holds, Hopkins holds
many levels above, wlad holds to the extreme of extremes, there has never been and never will be a boxer considered anywhere near championship level that holds to the extreme that wlad holds, he is a disgrace and the sooner he retires the better it will be for everyone other than the corrupt cheats that are making the money from his fights
Don't forget Wlad's LUNGING, full body-press splash before he wraps up your arms and waist and then judo throws you to the ground.
