Re: Mayweather v Maidana with Khan v Broner on the undercard...?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Richard schafer from golden boy has denied all of this.
Now im really annoyed as i really dont think khan deserves this fight at all...
He left a division like nathan cleverly and now gets the biggest payday of his life by beating two over the hill lightweights.
It is so so so wrong that bradley isnt fighting floyd and that part of boxing stinks!
You would have hope Top Rank and GBP would put their petty differences aside and get the big matches on. Don King would have done it.
Re: Mayweather v Maidana with Khan v Broner on the undercard...?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
g3org3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
If true its an interesting development and kind if makes sense and cents.Arums HBO card is starting to look pretty dam good. I can see Al Haymon pulling this off. After the hype Broner cant toil in some obscure comeback fight. Outside of Floyds personal poll it seems pretty clear that the majority of the public wants Maidana. Broner has a rematch clause with Maidana but Khan does not deserve the fight so the star Floyd beats up his little brothers conqueror and Khan is told that if he beats Broner he gets the Floyd fight. Floyd is not going to fight Broner so once Floyd dispatches Maidana and Broner has a huge comeback knocking out Khan, he will be in the drivers seat again for the rematch with Maidana having knocked out the man that beat him. Brilliant really.
Good plan but what makes you think that Broner can knock out Khan? Lmfao
I dont think haymon would think like that..
I do. Lets wait and see. A corn-dog thrown at the right angle could wobble Khan and please dont say that the Maidana fight with Broner has anything to do with a Khan fight.
I don't think khans chin is as bad as people say the fights he's been stopped in he's took huge shots from big punchers plus he's always got up after the 1st knock down, the problem is when he's hunt he goes on the attack
I agree and that's why I said the right angle.
Re: Mayweather v Maidana with Khan v Broner on the undercard...?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Richard schafer from golden boy has denied all of this.
Now im really annoyed as i really dont think khan deserves this fight at all...
He left a division like nathan cleverly and now gets the biggest payday of his life by beating two over the hill lightweights.
It is so so so wrong that bradley isnt fighting floyd and that part of boxing stinks!
May/Bradley should happen because of what Bradley has done. But how on earth would they sell it? Bradley is short, not particularly fast, doesn't have power. It's different when talking Pac/Bradley because Bradley has a shot against Pac. But I can't imagine how anyone would picture Bradley beating Floyd. For how boxing should work they should fight. But even if Bradley fought a perfect fight against Floyd it's hard to see him doing better than losing 8-4 or 9-3
Re: Mayweather v Maidana with Khan v Broner on the undercard...?
Aside from the promoters, the problem i see with the Mayweather / Bradley fight is this. No one truly believes that Bradley is as uncontested as he claims. The win over Pacquiao was obviously a rip off.just because Bradley was able to convince himself that is win was legit, doesn't mean that everybody else has been able to delude themselves the same way. The other issue Is his controversial win over provodnikov wasn' t much better.his assertion that he deliberately chose a poor style to fight the fight in order to gain points from everyone who thought he lost a Pacquiao is ridiculous. not because it has no chance of being true but because it is no ones decision but his. File it under brave, but stupid and ultimately lucky. Also it has become typical of Bradley to makes these type of post fight assertions to inflate his performance. His win over Marquez was good but doesn't erase the fact that it was to be expected for someone who's younger, carries the weight better and was more athletic and fresher. A legit win in the rematch against PAC will solidify him. Till then the demand for the rematch just goes to show that the legacy of someone he supposedly beat still overshadowed his. Something that shouldn't be. A guy that Legitimately shocked the world by beating one of the top two fighters in the world at the weight, shouldn't have any trouble getting on the radar of the other one. Not by the fans, not by the sanctioning bodies. (Networks and promoters will always have bias) - just my two cents...