Printable View
Lou Duva
"Just win this fight. You can look good in the next fight."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"He takes a good punch."
"He's a cagey guy."
"He's been in there with the best."
"He was in the Olympics 6 years ago."
"He was a long-time contender."
"A former Top 10 fighter."
"He was a highly-regarded prospect himself at one-time."
Most incorrectly and overused terms in boxing (by fighters)
I've got the most experience.
or
I'm the most experienced fighter.
In what way?Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTrae
I think you are misinterpreting exposed. It just means shown for what it is. It doesn't mean the person "exposed" is a bum or any insult at all. At the time casual boxing people thought Naz was the best fighter in the world even though they were hiding him from Marquez and Mayweather. In this case exposed simply means shown to the masses that he wasn't the Superman they thought. He was exposed as a beatable great champion who was highly entertaining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
'He's a good gym fighter.'
'Tough-Nosed'
'Cagey'
'Unproven'
'A Cutey'
[B][/ 'Well-Protected'B]
I don't agree with that definition. It makes no sense really, because obviously every champion is a "beatable champion". In that case, every time somebody loses they are "exposed" and that's really taking all meaning out of the term. The word "exposed" has much more negative connotations, you immediately think of a fraudster being "exposed".Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Swanson
I'm not saying it means that a guy goes from an A-level fighter to a bum, but it certainly means that a guy had successfully hidden a significant weakness, most of the time against soft opposition, and an A-level fighter exposed it. In Nas' case, I don't think that's a fair claim because even though he did have technical flaws, he had been champion for 7 or 8 years and had great success against top ranked opposition before losing to MAB. Sometimes a loss is just a loss, it doesn't necessarily mean an exposing.
ex-pose
[ik-spohz]
verb (used with object), exposed, exposing.
1. to lay open to danger, attack, harm, etc.:
"to expose soldiers to gunfire; to expose one's character to attack."
2. to lay open to something specified:
"to expose oneself to the influence of bad companions."
3. to uncover or bare to the air, cold, etc.:
"to expose one's head to the rain."
4. to present to view; exhibit; display:
"The storekeeper exposed his wares."
5. to make known, disclose, or reveal (intentions, secrets, etc.).
6. to reveal or unmask (a crime, fraud, impostor, etc.):
"to expose a swindler."
7. to hold up to public reprehension or ridicule (fault, folly, a foolish act or person, etc.).
To reveal or unmask a fraud or impostor. In the true sense of the word, a fighter is not exposed merely 'cause he loses, as Bean said. It's basically when a fighter is unmasked as not being as great as was previously thought, or as his record would indicate.
To me, the classic way of exposing a fighter is when the fighter has a bloated record, filled with non-competitive or low-quality opponents. Which is why W-L records are so overrated sometimes. You can fight 40 bums (yes... I'll use that word too) in your own hometown.... beat them all.... and be exposed when you finally fight someone good.
Matinee idol! WTF is a matinee idol?
IMO it's severly Overused.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44In what way?Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTrae
Every veteran fighter I can think of who is fighting an up in comer can beat them, why? Because I've got the most experience.
Grizzled veteran
"Big right hand!" by Jim Lampley.
"This is a seminal moment"Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
Al Bernstein
Think I've heard him use it in about 6 -10 fights.
Ring inactivity: 294 days; 346 days; blah, blah......
I have yet to see a fighter suffer in fights because of this (with the exception Ali, but that's different)
As if boxers sit on their asses the entire time in between fights.
Orlandito exposed himself!!!?????????;D
Overrated