Can't agree he was an embarrassment during his last fight. After the fight, yes he was embarrassing! IMO :cool:
Printable View
I think I'm the only one whose OK with the fight.
I'm definitely okay with the fight.
I get that it's been done before and most feel Pacquiao should have won both, so whats the point of a third?
For Pacquiao I think he wanted a top contender but also wanted someone his team would assume he can beat. I think that if Pac wins in April he will hang around for another fight. Bradley fits that role. Crawford may have been seen as too risky.
For Bradley it's all about proving he's the better fighter. He wants that win and wants to put all doubts aside. He's added Atlas to bring a little more to the story and hopefully his game.
It's a loser leaves town kinda fight. If Pac loses he'll probably retire. Bradley would probably move to 154 if he lost.
It's a fight between two top contenders.
@Silkeyjoe - what was the prices for their last fight? (I can't remember, obviously)
It's a horrible matchup seeing as Pac won easily last time. Bradley might well win this but that is because Manny is injured, old and inactive.You shouldnt have a rematch after a fairly decisive win. It is an Arum Shylock move.
pac will throw the fight, get KOed and retire
Bradley will be arums new cash cow
I am ok with this also. May not be a great swan song for Manny though cause I think there is a good chance he loses. I question what the guy has left as a fighter.
I bet this is PPV just like Floyd v Berto.