Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Brook would have lost to every recent fighter GGG has fought.
Nah
Yes
nah
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
who then?
I think brook would beat lemeux (spelling) who people say is GGGs best win
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
That is total nonsense because if it was true Brook would have fought at the weight before earning more money and prestige at the weight. Stop believing the sky hype.
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
That is total nonsense because if it was true Brook would have fought at the weight before earning more money and prestige at the weight. Stop believing the sky hype.
You're going to have to explain that to me Master as I have no idea what you're trying to say ;D
Other than the conclusion which you're totally entitled to your opinion on, the rest is fact isnt it?
If Sky or anyone else for that matter have the same opinion as I do on a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight it's purely coincidence, or sound judgement ;)
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
That is total nonsense because if it was true Brook would have fought at the weight before earning more money and prestige at the weight. Stop believing the sky hype.
You're going to have to explain that to me Master as I have no idea what you're trying to say ;D
Other than the conclusion which you're totally entitled to your opinion on, the rest is fact isnt it?
If Sky or anyone else for that matter have the same opinion as I do on a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight it's purely coincidence, or sound judgement ;)
How many people were saying Brooks could become a middleweight champion when he was a welterweight title holder ? none.
This fight is only happening because Junior turned it down and sky need their quota of ppv fights even mismatches like this.
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
That is total nonsense because if it was true Brook would have fought at the weight before earning more money and prestige at the weight. Stop believing the sky hype.
You're going to have to explain that to me Master as I have no idea what you're trying to say ;D
Other than the conclusion which you're totally entitled to your opinion on, the rest is fact isnt it?
If Sky or anyone else for that matter have the same opinion as I do on a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight it's purely coincidence, or sound judgement ;)
How many people were saying Brooks could become a middleweight champion when he was a welterweight title holder ? none.
This fight is only happening because Junior turned it down and sky need their quota of ppv fights even mismatches like this.
Still not sure how any of that makes what I said about a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight nonsense?
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
That is total nonsense because if it was true Brook would have fought at the weight before earning more money and prestige at the weight. Stop believing the sky hype.
You're going to have to explain that to me Master as I have no idea what you're trying to say ;D
Other than the conclusion which you're totally entitled to your opinion on, the rest is fact isnt it?
If Sky or anyone else for that matter have the same opinion as I do on a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight it's purely coincidence, or sound judgement ;)
How many people were saying Brooks could become a middleweight champion when he was a welterweight title holder ? none.
This fight is only happening because Junior turned it down and sky need their quota of ppv fights even mismatches like this.
Still not sure how any of that makes what I said about a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight nonsense?
Lemieux would walk through Brook as he has too much power and size.
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
I didnt mention power, you may be right, you may be wrong, but for me, Lemieux's 'power' is great at a certain level.
Master they're the same size.
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Brook is the same size as Lemieux, Lemieux loves to stumble forward eating jabs, Brook's got a great jab. I say he batters him.
That is total nonsense because if it was true Brook would have fought at the weight before earning more money and prestige at the weight. Stop believing the sky hype.
You're going to have to explain that to me Master as I have no idea what you're trying to say ;D
Other than the conclusion which you're totally entitled to your opinion on, the rest is fact isnt it?
If Sky or anyone else for that matter have the same opinion as I do on a hypothetical Brook Lemieux fight it's purely coincidence, or sound judgement ;)
How many people were saying
Brooks could become a middleweight champion when he was a welterweight title holder ? none.
This fight is only happening because Junior turned it down and sky need their quota of ppv fights even mismatches like this.
Master, I agree with you completely but for the last last time his name is BROOK not Brooks :p
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
It's not about falling for Sky hype you fucking miserable ponce, it's Golovkin fighting in our country against a 36-0, "world" champion Brit.
For the Brit fans that actually watch boxing, unlike you, it's exciting regardless of whether Kell is in to deep or not. If he's not it's gonna be terrific.
Re: Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
It's not about falling for Sky hype you fucking miserable ponce, it's Golovkin fighting in our country against a 36-0, "world" champion Brit.
For the Brit fans that actually watch boxing, unlike you, it's exciting regardless of whether Kell is in to deep or not. If he's not it's gonna be terrific.
I'm actually really lucky in that respect because I manage to get excited for fights and really look forward to them whilst always being able to see that they are complete mismatches and that Sky are absolute cockwombles
its about finding the right balance