Wladimir Klitschko is taking Tyson Fury to court over violation of contract

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Yes and you know it is true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Yes and you know it is true.

---

with the exception of Wlad, who has Fury beaten that's better than Dillian Whyte, Charles Martin and Brezeale ?
While you're at it , tell me who Wilder has beaten that's better?
Still a cheap holder is he?

Joshua got fast tracked to the title and was damn lucky at the way the opportunity opened up for him but it is pretty obvious that he belongs with the elite of the division purely because the 'decent' opponents get KTFO in the first few rounds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

I blame Wlad and his rematch contracts. He should retire and allow Fury to have made some defences by now instead of holding up the division.

---

Pretty much what I'm saying Master.
If Wlad walks away it clears the path for fury to fight new IBF champion David Price in a rematch.

---

If Wlad retired and therefore did not invoke the rematch clause the titles would not have split and cheap holders would not have been champions.

---

who are cheap holders? are you suggesting Joshua is a "Cheap Holder" of a World Title?

---

Yes and you know it is true.

---

with the exception of Wlad, who has Fury beaten that's better than Dillian Whyte, Charles Martin and Brezeale ?
While you're at it , tell me who Wilder has beaten that's better?
Still a cheap holder is he?

---

And who had Charles Martin and Breazeale beaten?

Breazeale was lucky he was awarded a decision against Fred Kassi who Hughie Fury was toying with till he got cut. Martin was lucky ato be in the right place st the right time when Glazkovs knee went because he didnt do much there either.

Dillian Whyte hasnt done anything above British level yet, in fact he got knocked out in his first try. You are saying they are all good just on association because Joshua must be good because Sky and Hearn tell you so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

And who had Charles Martin and Breazeale beaten?

Breazeale was lucky he was awarded a decision against Fred Kassi who Hughie Fury was toying with till he got cut. Martin was lucky ato be in the right place st the right time when Glazkovs knee went because he didnt do much there either.

Dillian Whyte hasnt done anything above British level yet, in fact he got knocked out in his first try. You are saying they are all good just on association because Joshua must be good because Sky and Hearn tell you so.

---

The main thing those fighters haven't done is.....test positive for a performance enhancing drug which I guess is what we need to expect from the heavyweight champion these days.

Tell me which one has?;D

The only heavy who has tested positive for anything is Ortiz.Oh and Vitali years ago;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Tell me which one has?;D

The only heavy who has tested positive for anything is Ortiz.Oh and Vitali years ago;)

---

Tyson Fury, Alexander Povetkin, Erkan Teper, Tony Thompson

Tyson didnt test positive, the others did you moron;D:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Tyson didnt test positive, the others did you moron;D:rolleyes:

---

Roll your eyes until they fall out of your fool fucking head. Tyson Fury tested positive if he hadn't THIS Tyson Fury To Take On UKAD Over Drug Test Results - Boxing News wouldn't be a thing would it?

Yeah, that Fury boy looks like a REAL peach don't he? Just honest as the day is longTyson Fury: World heavyweight champion faces UK Anti-Doping charge - BBC Sport

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQveng3Wxz8

This
"UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers (Tyson and Hughie Fury) were charged on 24 June, 2016 with presence of a prohibited substance."

and

This
"Tyson didnt test positive"


Are mutually exclusive statements meaning that they cannot both be right

For fuck sakes they are both right!

He did have higher than normal levels of nadrolone which is a naturally occuring substance anyway. He didnt have high enough to test positive which means it wasnt a positive test.

Fuck me this is embarrasing watching you cling with all youv got for dear life hoping it will in some way reverse how easily Tyson out maneuvered and out boxed your hero, like some kind of saviour for Klitschkos career;D

Do you not remember how easy I said it would be? And it was wasnt it. I never said ztyson wasnt going to need some kind of special performance we have never seen. I said these actual words that you lot couldnt see the wood for the trees that what Tyson does well would leave Klitscko standing. It wasnt out of the ordinary, it wasnt Klitschko suddenly getting older. It was Tyson Fury being too good for Wladimir Klitschko;)

If Tyson had tested positive which he didnt you know full well he wouldnt have got anywhere near a title challenge and pointing out Povetkin proves my point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

For fuck sakes they are both right!

He did have higher than normal levels of nadrolone which is a naturally occuring substance anyway. He didnt have high enough to test positive which means it wasnt a positive test.

Fuck me this is embarrasing watching you cling with all youv got for dear life hoping it will in some way reverse how easily Tyson out maneuvered and out boxed your hero, like some kind of saviour for Klitschkos career;D

Do you not remember how easy I said it would be? And it was wasnt it. I never said ztyson wasnt going to need some kind of special performance we have never seen. I said these actual words that you lot couldnt see the wood for the trees that what Tyson does well would leave Klitscko standing. It wasnt out of the ordinary, it wasnt Klitschko suddenly getting older. It was Tyson Fury being too good for Wladimir Klitschko;)

If Tyson had tested positive which he didnt you know full well he wouldnt have got anywhere near a title challenge and pointing out Povetkin proves my point.

---

Aww honey, I hate to break it to you puddin' pop but no, both of those statements are NOT right.

Now you say "nadrolone which is a naturally occuring [sic] substance anyway." and that is true, it's true just like cannabinoids which are found in marijuana are also found in the human body....naturally. Yet this doesn't mean that smoking pot is not "doing drugs".....do you understand? Well if you don't, oh and I believe you don't hahaha get this Nandrolone is and I quote "ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR ANABOLIC STEROIDS TO EVER BE CREATED" https://www.steroid.com/Nandrolone.php


Tyson Fury is a cheat ross and you are pathetic, but then again we've all known that for quite a while.