We'll never see Tyson Fury again a la Leon or Buster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust

@ross you have gone batshit. Your grammar and syntax is hideous and your use dangling participial phrases is nothing short of a level 1 or 2 ESL student. My current rate as an ESL teacher is $44 an hour which is about 33 pounds. I'll give you a 10% discount.

---

but you still cant spell pyjamas;D

The only entertaining thing about that fight was Fury singing at the end with Wlad walking around with a wtf look on his face.;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYQaSyqELWo

@ross, the word was adopted from Benghali, where it was roughly payjama, which comes from the Persian term pay-jameh and has absolutely no English etymology whatsoever. There's no way you're as thick as you make out on here, get it together.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p4pking

@ross, the word was adopted from Benghali, where it was roughly payjama, which comes from the Persian term pay-jameh and has absolutely no English etymology whatsoever. There's no way you're as thick as you make out on here, get it together.

---

You searched Wikipedia for that;D

I can tell you this. The american word pajama is a lazy spelling of their english language word pyjama.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p4pking

@ross, the word was adopted from Benghali, where it was roughly payjama, which comes from the Persian term pay-jameh and has absolutely no English etymology whatsoever. There's no way you're as thick as you make out on here, get it together.

---

You searched Wikipedia for that;D

I can tell you this. The american word pajama is a lazy spelling of their english language word pyjama.

---

Of course I double checked, just wanted to make sure you were being as stupid as it seemed. I did know the word came from India, was unaware it was originally Persian. If the English copied it and changed the spelling, what's the difference if the Americans did so again?;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p4pking

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p4pking

@ross, the word was adopted from Benghali, where it was roughly payjama, which comes from the Persian term pay-jameh and has absolutely no English etymology whatsoever. There's no way you're as thick as you make out on here, get it together.

---

You searched Wikipedia for that;D

I can tell you this. The american word pajama is a lazy spelling of their english language word pyjama.

---

Of course I double checked, just wanted to make sure you were being as stupid as it seemed. I did know the word came from India, was unaware it was originally Persian. If the English copied it and changed the spelling, what's the difference if the Americans did so again?;D

---

Just avoid eye contact.......

Check out Frank Zappa's "Pajama People"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ross

Tyson talks a lot of shit and everyone jumps on it as if its all gospel like when hed retired;D

The main reason he hasnt fought for so long is because he had to sign his rights away to fight Wlad. The same reason Joshua now has one of Tysons belts.Otherwise Tyson would have had an easy defence against Glazkov first and Hearn would still be manoeuvring Joshua.

Dates and venues had to line up with TV before they could set a date. The Klitschko are notoriously difficult to deal with and the contracts werent finalised until a few weeks ago.

Maybe Tyson is fed up of being tied to Klitschko and doesnt mind the consequences?

I think what could happen is Parker fights Ruiz for WBO and Klitschko fights Brown for WBA with Oquendo stepping aside with guarantee of being first defence.

Mean while Joshua is left looking for someone to fight. This could all affect Joshuas next date because I cant see Hearn really wanting the Klitschko fight. The sanctioning bodies arent likely to risk being sued by just saying ok you two just fight for these belts, fuck the ranked contenders next in line and then they are contracted to seperate TV channels. Like Hearn said, things will move on and they will. No one is going to wait further for him to organise a huge fight which in reality wouldnt happen until 2017.

---

He would've never had an easy IBF defense as he was obliged to the rematch. He was getting stripped regardless. If AJ didn't pick it up you and the Fury's wouldn't be half as bothered.

The reason Tyson hasn't fought is because he's TWICE pulled out of the rematch. First time with a sore ankle (ha ha), second time citing depression. So it's not Wlad's fault.

Fury signed for the rematch clause and failed to make the fights. No-one else to blame.

Tyson Fury had to sign up to the rematch clause regardless, it was not a choice.

well Fury has officially retired and has told us all to go suck a dick

straight from twatter

what a fool the man is

And? Rematch clauses happen all the time. How is it Wlad's fault Fury hasn't fought considering he ducked out of two set dates?

its pretty funny

someone fights a klit after signing all the stupid shit on the contract, beats him then twists his nips

common Tyson

Retired? He's never done that before

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master

Tyson Fury had to sign up to the rematch clause regardless, it was not a choice.

---

Fury knew all this when he signed the first contract. and anyway, he still had 2 titles, so wtf? The point of all this is that Governing bodies make you fight Mandatories or you lose your belts. When Wlad was beating the Pianeta's etc. of this World, everybody slagged him off big time, but he HAD TO fight them otherwise he would've got stripped and he wanted ALL the titles. Fuck all wrong with that in my book.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Retired? He's never done that before

---

Retired because "boxing is corrupt" ......as he wipes the powder from his nose

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMNttIrS35g


"He's not on drugs I know that for a fact"