Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you now?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurate
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurate
You thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurate
You thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.
what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I never
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurate
You thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.
what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I never
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
Yet Tyson knocked him out in 5 and 3 rounds. :)
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurate
You thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.
what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I never
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
Yet Tyson knocked him out in 5 and 3 rounds. :)
everyone had a bogeyman
Lewis had 2
just so happened Bruno had Tyson
:)
just like Ross loves Tyson Fury and no matter what you say he will always be the greatest fighter that ever lived, and as lyle loves wlad and no matter what you say all wlads holding was completely legit (coz the ref didn't call it), ive got Bruno :)
Re: Joe Parker should be 20(17)-1-0 - Obvious Illegal Punch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you know?
that sentence isn't accurate
correct it and then we can continue the conversation
Bloody auto correct. :mad:
it wasn't the spelling that was inaccurate
You thought it was a good fight when it was plainly a mis-match.
what was? Brook GGG? you said that I said that I thought that Brook nearly beat GGG and I never
you also said that I thought that Bruno was a great HW, I don't only think it, I know it, best lb4lb HW in history over 5 or 6 rounds
Yet Tyson knocked him out in 5 and 3 rounds. :)
everyone had a bogeyman
Lewis had 2
just so happened Bruno had Tyson
:)
just like Ross loves Tyson Fury and no matter what you say he will always be the greatest fighter that ever lived, and as lyle loves wlad and no matter what you say all wlads holding was completely legit (coz the ref didn't call it), ive got Bruno :)
....if Bruno knew how to hold maybe he would have been a bit better :-X