Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
@
El Kabong there's no risk for Crawford because Horn is shit
Crawford would be risking nothing fighting Horn (he'd KO him)
Mayweather has retired and will be 41 in less than six months.
Really Crawford should be calling out Garcia, Thurman, Spence
Or other fighters in their prime around his weight class.
I don't care if Horn is shit. You assume Crawford would KO him (he probably would) but it doesn't mean there's no risk. And to that point if Floyd isn't willing to take a risk then that tells everyone the story of his career...the biggest risks he ever took were Diego Corrales and Canelo 2 guys in their primes....that is all, Great????
Mayweather can still fight, 41 is not all that old.
Crawford can call out whoever he wants if he's calling out Floyd and aiming for the tippy top of the boxing game then more power to him, I'm not going to begrudge him that. That's like Floyd making big money from BOXING an MMA fighter, I don't begrudge him the money, it's a shitty fight and whoever bought it is a dope, but I'm not saying the guy didn't earn that money. If Crawford is calling out Floyd it means he wants THE BEST so you call out Floyd and anyone can step up and answer that, Garcia Thurman Spence, anyone and I am sure they will.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
I reckon that Mayweather knows that he has lost a step and that father time is catching up with him fast, he knows that Crawford or anyone like that would be a massive risk, hence why he fought someone who is not a boxer.
His ego is too big to let him risk the 0, I think that he is done.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
I don't know who you consider great @El Kabong
But what was Ali, Leonard, Robinson and Jones doing at 41?
Floyd is still unbeaten and was still fighting at the highest level
Well into his late 30s whereas most guys had long since retired.
Leonard, Ali, Tyson, Jones were all getting beat up in their late 30s
You obviously want to see Floyd get beaten but it'll never happen
50-0 with hundreds of millions in the bank. He doesn't need Crawford.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
I don't know who you consider great @
El Kabong
But what was Ali, Leonard, Robinson and Jones doing at 41?
Floyd is still unbeaten and was still fighting at the highest level
Well into his late 30s whereas most guys had long since retired.
Leonard, Ali, Tyson, Jones were all getting beat up in their late 30s
You obviously want to see Floyd get beaten but it'll never happen
50-0 with hundreds of millions in the bank. He doesn't need Crawford.
If the greats picked and chose their fights to the extent Floyd did and breaks he had in between, they would be fighting until they were 41.
Forget Floyd, his records will be surpassed and he will be forgotten. His legacy is nothing compared to the real great fighters.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Eh Floyd is 41 years old which is pretty much being a 1000 in this sport he cashed out with Conner and he is done. Crawford is the future though which is nice because i was not so sure how it be when big guys left.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Eh Floyd is 41 years old which is pretty much being a 1000 in this sport he cashed out with Conner and he is done. Crawford is the future though which is nice because i was not so sure how it be when big guys left.
Boxing moves on and if it can find great fighters after Ali and Leonard then it can certainly find them after Floyd.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Eh Floyd is 41 years old which is pretty much being a 1000 in this sport he cashed out with Conner and he is done. Crawford is the future though which is nice because i was not so sure how it be when big guys left.
Boxing moves on and if it can find great fighters after Ali and Leonard then it can certainly find them after Floyd.
So why the fuck do you keep talking about him? Because while you keep banging on about him, he remains relevant and boxing doesn't "Move on"!
Let it fucking go ffs.
There is a thread about him so I am commenting on it, Sherlock.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
I don't know who you consider great @
El Kabong
But what was Ali, Leonard, Robinson and Jones doing at 41?
Floyd is still unbeaten and was still fighting at the highest level
Well into his late 30s whereas most guys had long since retired.
Leonard, Ali, Tyson, Jones were all getting beat up in their late 30s
You obviously want to see Floyd get beaten but it'll never happen
50-0 with hundreds of millions in the bank. He doesn't need Crawford.
If the greats picked and chose their fights to the extent Floyd did and breaks he had in between, they would be fighting until they were 41.
Forget Floyd, his records will be surpassed and he will be forgotten. His legacy is nothing compared to the real great fighters.
Leonard did take breaks between fights
And actually fought ten times less than Floyd.
The man won belts in five weight divisions
And had over 20 world title fights (all of which he won)
I'm not saying Floyd is the greatest of all time (he isn't)
But he's still a great fighter and nobody can argue that.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
I don't know who you consider great @
El Kabong
But what was Ali, Leonard, Robinson and Jones doing at 41?
Floyd is still unbeaten and was still fighting at the highest level
Well into his late 30s whereas most guys had long since retired.
Leonard, Ali, Tyson, Jones were all getting beat up in their late 30s
You obviously want to see Floyd get beaten but it'll never happen
50-0 with hundreds of millions in the bank. He doesn't need Crawford.
If the greats picked and chose their fights to the extent Floyd did and breaks he had in between, they would be fighting until they were 41.
Forget Floyd, his records will be surpassed and he will be forgotten. His legacy is nothing compared to the real great fighters.
Leonard did take breaks between fights
And actually fought ten times less than Floyd.
The man won belts in five weight divisions
And had over 20 world title fights (all of which he won)
I'm not saying Floyd is the greatest of all time (he isn't)
But he's still a great fighter and nobody can argue that.
That doesn't compute with @Master, he sees the words 'Mayweather' and 'great fighter' and automatically goes on the defensive and thinks that people are saying he is the greatest man ever to lace up a pair of gloves.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
I don't know who you consider great @
El Kabong
But what was Ali, Leonard, Robinson and Jones doing at 41?
Floyd is still unbeaten and was still fighting at the highest level
Well into his late 30s whereas most guys had long since retired.
Leonard, Ali, Tyson, Jones were all getting beat up in their late 30s
You obviously want to see Floyd get beaten but it'll never happen
50-0 with hundreds of millions in the bank. He doesn't need Crawford.
If the greats picked and chose their fights to the extent Floyd did and breaks he had in between, they would be fighting until they were 41.
Forget Floyd, his records will be surpassed and he will be forgotten. His legacy is nothing compared to the real great fighters.
Leonard did take breaks between fights
And actually fought ten times less than Floyd.
The man won belts in five weight divisions
And had over 20 world title fights (all of which he won)
I'm not saying Floyd is the greatest of all time (he isn't)
But he's still a great fighter and nobody can argue that.
Leonard took breaks because he was injured not for contractual reasons.
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
I'm not saying Floyd is the greatest of all time (he isn't)
But he's still a great fighter and nobody can argue that.
Floyd is a great fighter, but he's also a great opportunist....dude name me a boxer Conor McGregor would beat in boxing....it ain't Bud Crawford
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
I'm not saying Floyd is the greatest of all time (he isn't)
But he's still a great fighter and nobody can argue that.
Floyd is a great fighter, but he's also a great opportunist....dude name me a boxer Conor McGregor would beat in boxing....it ain't Bud Crawford
McGregor is a bitch for sure
But what does that have to do with Floyd?
Re: If Crawford called out Floyd?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Eh Floyd is 41 years old which is pretty much being a 1000 in this sport he cashed out with Conner and he is done. Crawford is the future though which is nice because i was not so sure how it be when big guys left.
Boxing moves on and if it can find great fighters after Ali and Leonard then it can certainly find them after Floyd.
So why the fuck do you keep talking about him? Because while you keep banging on about him, he remains relevant and boxing doesn't "Move on"!
Let it fucking go ffs.
There is a thread about him so I am commenting on it, Sherlock.
There are a million threads about him and you comment on every single one.
And you can't see what you're doing.... by continually commenting whether good or bad, you are increasing the legacy! Has any Boxer ever been talked about as much, positive or negative?
Because it goes on and on , fence sitters turn around and say "fuck me, like him or not, he must've been something special for all this fuss!"
And then they say "fuck ! He was 50-0 , MAYBE he was TBE?"
Elementary dear Watson.😂
That is the most illogical and dumbest post ever.
(PK would be proud you have won his award)
