Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

Re: Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

I have some amateur footage of a 17 year old Tommy Hearns fighting Pryor , its a rock em sock em fight Pryor wins on points.
Fact is he never changed his brawling style , was always wide open to the straight right.

I think I have seen that footage. Prior was incredible and had an incredible chin. Also did Fenster really just ban @TitoFan

Re: Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

Anyone fighting prime Pryor would have to go through hell to beat him. Not saying it couldn't be done, just not many would be able to stand up to that relentless aggression for 15 rounds.

Re: Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS-carEx2Do

Re: Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

I agree with Pryor.

Re: Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master

I agree with Pryor.

100% yes

Re: Who beats 1982 Aaron Pryor?.....{crickets}

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr140

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spicoli

I'm not ready to write Pryor off as an early version of James Kirkland doing impressions of a crash test dummy but he threw caution to the wind constantly and that was his whole hope of getting his early push. He was buzzed and or dropped in major fights and granted he brushed it off mostly and got right back to trying to rip a guys head off. He freely gave up his head. It's not a case of 'what could he have been' like some others as he had early opportunities he turned down, had platforms off his biggest wins and instead balked at challengers and dropped his trinket. Arguello was coming up sure but in fairness Pryor wasn't exactly a big 140 but fighters weathering a storm and mobile fast timing punchers I think would have done very well putting him off pace and turning his forward sprint against him. I'd go so far to think a Chavez form Frankie Randall would have found too many open lanes right down the middle. Taylor would get sucked in and fight his fight maybe. Crawford..forget about it. Pryor v Cotto 140 would have been hellfire and brimstone.

I think Pryor being as open as he was would of cost him against Leonard or Hearns because at 147 if they had someone in trouble it was over. Not many people are going to take clean shots off Hearns at 147 even at higher weights it was bad idea. There are still match ups he could be in that would allow for his style to take it but against those guys i am pretty sure it would not work out. Leonard was a monster at 147 and besides his offence being amazing his defence was great to.

Yeh I think he would have been pushing it at 147 and initially he himself was the early lightweight coming up. Hearts was just a different type of animal and while Pryor wore his heart and fire on his sleeve Hearns and Leonard were entirely a cut above with skill and athleticism. A lot of Pryors problems were born and repeated outside the ring with who he got advice and input from as we'll as his own unflinching stubbornness.