Re: Why Floyd Won - No Excuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRMANICK
Stop making excuses and answer the question. Your definition of domination was''beating the life out of". These are your words. This definition is not from any boxing manual or dictionary. So by your definition this is what you said,"zab beat the life out of floyd in the early rounds"lol. Do yo really believe that? I know you got a little a crush on the man but damn is love really this blind?
I'm not blind. Zab was beating the life out of Floyd early, then I also said as Zab was dominant Floyd took from Zab's advantages to his own. I was actually giving Mayweather credit. And you say it's not the definition in any boxing manual or dictionary. Since when do I have to follow the dictionary with my opinion ;)
So I answered your question
You answer mine.
Was Judah dominating Floyd early or was he not?
Re: Why Floyd Won - No Excuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRMANICK
Stop making excuses and answer the question. Your definition of domination was''beating the life out of". These are your words. This definition is not from any boxing manual or dictionary. So by your definition this is what you said,"zab beat the life out of floyd in the early rounds"lol. Do yo really believe that? I know you got a little a crush on the man but damn is love really this blind?
I'm not blind. Zab was beating the life out of Floyd early, then I also said as Zab was dominant Floyd took from Zab's advantages to his own. I was actually giving Mayweather credit. And you say it's not the definition in any boxing manual or dictionary. Since when do I have to follow the dictionary with my opinion ;)
So I answered your question
You answer mine.
Was Judah dominating Floyd early or was he not?
Well by your definition no. the only person i saw getting the life beat out of them in that fight was judah.Did judah do better than most of floyds opponents in the early rounds?yes but unfortunately the big boys fight 12 round fights not 4 rounds. Hey think of it this way, if it was an amateur fight or the olympics he would of won. And the definition of a single english word is a fact not an opinion. Thats why we have a thing called a dictionary and if you pick one up you will see that the definiton of domination is not,"beating the life out of"
Re: Why Floyd Won - No Excuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRMANICK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRMANICK
Stop making excuses and answer the question. Your definition of domination was''beating the life out of". These are your words. This definition is not from any boxing manual or dictionary. So by your definition this is what you said,"zab beat the life out of floyd in the early rounds"lol. Do yo really believe that? I know you got a little a crush on the man but damn is love really this blind?
I'm not blind. Zab was beating the life out of Floyd early, then I also said as Zab was dominant Floyd took from Zab's advantages to his own. I was actually giving Mayweather credit. And you say it's not the definition in any boxing manual or dictionary. Since when do I have to follow the dictionary with my opinion ;)
So I answered your question
You answer mine.
Was Judah dominating Floyd early or was he not?
Well by your definition no. the only person i saw getting the life beat out of them in that fight was judah.Did judah do better than most of floyds opponents in the early rounds?yes but unfortunately the big boys fight 12 round fights
yep, and guess who won the last 2 rounds?
;)
Re: Why Floyd Won - No Excuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
well the roger inccident really fucked up his chance to have the glory this time
i think people are criticizing him cuz he talked alot, about how he was gonna KO zab, and zab was nothing, and they started to believe it,
and then they saw him have ALOT of trouble with somoen they thought was nothing
The roger incident was caused by the judah low blow incident. How funny would it be if the result was changed....to mayweather wins by dq in the 10th due to a intentional low blow.
