Exactly. Reeducation at the border of THEIR country first (by me & Reginald @20 Somali shillings per hour)(full airfare included) then again at the Statue of Liberty and London Bridge just to be sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Printable View
Exactly. Reeducation at the border of THEIR country first (by me & Reginald @20 Somali shillings per hour)(full airfare included) then again at the Statue of Liberty and London Bridge just to be sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
@Andre, you are a racistQuote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzThat is hugely dishonest of you Brockton. The only one here who uses the race card is you. Nigh on every day. You cant help telling us how you are Armenian. How your foreign students are lucky to have you. How your family were immigrants. How many languages you speak. You even repeatedly reply to posters in their own language, it's fucking nauseating. Your over compensation is embarrassing.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI agree mate there are some bleeding heart liberal liberals who are way too hasty to point the finger and play the race card,,……… it is just too easy to do and so totally politically correctQuote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Absolutely nobody here would call Andre a racist for saying what he has, but you would like to believe that they would, so that you could remind us of how cultured and knowledgeable you are, whilst still being a real man not afraid to call Anglo Saxons pigs and rats. You have started idiot guide threads now so condescending have you become.
@Andre, you are a racistQuote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzThat is hugely dishonest of you Brockton. The only one here who uses the race card is you. Nigh on every day. You cant help telling us how you are Armenian. How your foreign students are lucky to have you. How your family were immigrants. How many languages you speak. You even repeatedly reply to posters in their own language, it's fucking nauseating. Your over compensation is embarrassing.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI agree mate there are some bleeding heart liberal liberals who are way too hasty to point the finger and play the race card,,……… it is just too easy to do and so totally politically correctQuote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Absolutely nobody here would call Andre a racist for saying what he has, but you would like to believe that they would, so that you could remind us of how cultured and knowledgeable you are, whilst still being a real man not afraid to call Anglo Saxons pigs and rats. You have started idiot guide threads now so condescending have you become.
The gears on my racist bike seized so Im peddling cultural hatred instead.:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus@Andre, you are a racistQuote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzThat is hugely dishonest of you Brockton. The only one here who uses the race card is you. Nigh on every day. You cant help telling us how you are Armenian. How your foreign students are lucky to have you. How your family were immigrants. How many languages you speak. You even repeatedly reply to posters in their own language, it's fucking nauseating. Your over compensation is embarrassing.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI agree mate there are some bleeding heart liberal liberals who are way too hasty to point the finger and play the race card,,……… it is just too easy to do and so totally politically correctQuote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Absolutely nobody here would call Andre a racist for saying what he has, but you would like to believe that they would, so that you could remind us of how cultured and knowledgeable you are, whilst still being a real man not afraid to call Anglo Saxons pigs and rats. You have started idiot guide threads now so condescending have you become.
Exactly how it should work. If you fuck up you get sent back.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustthree Somalis in Kuala Lumpur who lived in a building adjacent to one I was living in while teaching there for 2 years were arrested for causing BEDLAM AND VIOLENT MAYHEM in a cell phone store. Because the vendor was a Malaysian Muslim the Somalis believed that he should have given them a discount. When he would not give them the discount one pulled out a machete and begin chopping the glass showcase. I had just left the area an hour before the next thing I know three somalis are rounded up and brought to immigration and deported.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
(I fancy a free trip back to England ,Ive done my time here, wheres my bat)
I heard you're good at cricketQuote:
Originally Posted by AndreExactly how it should work. If you fuck up you get sent back.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustthree Somalis in Kuala Lumpur who lived in a building adjacent to one I was living in while teaching there for 2 years were arrested for causing BEDLAM AND VIOLENT MAYHEM in a cell phone store. Because the vendor was a Malaysian Muslim the Somalis believed that he should have given them a discount. When he would not give them the discount one pulled out a machete and begin chopping the glass showcase. I had just left the area an hour before the next thing I know three somalis are rounded up and brought to immigration and deported.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
(I fancy a free trip back to England ,Ive done my time here, wheres my bat)
I lack the correct twitch fiber. @denilson200 @walrus beach slumberQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI heard you're good at cricketQuote:
Originally Posted by AndreExactly how it should work. If you fuck up you get sent back.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustthree Somalis in Kuala Lumpur who lived in a building adjacent to one I was living in while teaching there for 2 years were arrested for causing BEDLAM AND VIOLENT MAYHEM in a cell phone store. Because the vendor was a Malaysian Muslim the Somalis believed that he should have given them a discount. When he would not give them the discount one pulled out a machete and begin chopping the glass showcase. I had just left the area an hour before the next thing I know three somalis are rounded up and brought to immigration and deported.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
(I fancy a free trip back to England ,Ive done my time here, wheres my bat)
Bbbbb.......bbbbbb....b.......b......BBBBBWWWAAAAA AAAAAAK AAAAAAHA#HAHASHTAG!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreI lack the correct twitch fiber. @denilson200 @walrus beach slumberQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI heard you're good at cricketQuote:
Originally Posted by AndreExactly how it should work. If you fuck up you get sent back.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustthree Somalis in Kuala Lumpur who lived in a building adjacent to one I was living in while teaching there for 2 years were arrested for causing BEDLAM AND VIOLENT MAYHEM in a cell phone store. Because the vendor was a Malaysian Muslim the Somalis believed that he should have given them a discount. When he would not give them the discount one pulled out a machete and begin chopping the glass showcase. I had just left the area an hour before the next thing I know three somalis are rounded up and brought to immigration and deported.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
(I fancy a free trip back to England ,Ive done my time here, wheres my bat)
We now have people on social media and also marching in the streets against each other over refugees and terrorists concerning percentages of either. The sides are now extreme themselves. If one lot went out into the streets to rally and the other side didnt show up: (the more racist ones) would from their lowest ebbs or pl...., would end up beating the shit out of something anyway maybe each other by mistake or smashing cops or property: because a certain percentage of them are fascist in their style of approach already so have very little control over their own emotions and are looking for an argument to feel correct on reflection. The uni student types who have some guts to march out against them still don't understand that there is a chance of a real threat generating out of other cultures here. They are in a state of total denial due to being in what they see 'In total opposition of racism'. They should all on both sides be rallying to our governments instead, to manage refugees and immigrants from all parts of the world in a certain way that they are integrated into our own culture with respect and use this schooling period as a second filter system to weed out radicals who wont change. As it stands now we will be bombed again,we will have some innocents dragged out into the streets probably by sleeper groups who are already living here and once again the racists will have more reasons to kick up and blame what they think are fools opposing them. See the catch 22? No one and no problem is going to magically go away while standing in straight opposition to others taunting them or blaming them. That is a non working scenario in an already multicultural country.
Some people believe it is being done to society by design. Kind of like the way the United States and the UK like to keep the Middle East in turmoil and chaos. However others think that it is not in the government's best interest to have constant chaos in society. You would figure if there was law and order and everybody was happy that they would consume more and that therefore the corporation's would earn more money off of that kind of calm and law and order latest. It is definitely a catch 22
Separate issue and somewhat larger but yeah some do think its all by design and when you look at the cops in the US going military on the public under the courts full protection you can clearly see what they expect to occur and their end vision.
Obama actually stopped the feds from providing military equpitment to police in may of 2015. Still about four billion in said hardware is already in the local police departments.
@walrusQuote:
Originally Posted by walrus
F.I.F.Y.
Oh snap, I already forgot, [MENTION=6504]denilson200Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
@denilson200@snap.com So its sort of like the forums version of water boarding.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusOh snap, I already forgot, [MENTION=6504]denilson200Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Political correctness is a method the elite use to shut down diversity in the opinions and language that we use. The powers that be want to control the type of language used and the opinions that are deemed acceptable and will use this to set the agenda that they want. For a long time all you ever heard in response to people saying 'We need to control immigration. Wages are being driven down and there is not enough housing and the demands on public services are too great' was 'You are racist, you are xenophobic, you are hateful etc'. Now the arguments made originally had merit and more people are waking up to that, but that is an example of how they try to control the discourse. You see the same thing with the war on terror and the constant use of the word terrorist. Basically anyone who rejects the government narrative ends up being an extremist. That in itself is extremism and unfortunately the schools and news networks are very powerful. It is harder to get the counter narrative out there. Sadly, people still listen to the BBC and Co.
PC pea brains: "you shouldn't say THIS and you shouldn't say THAT!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
bwAAAAAAHAHAHA.........uhhhh, .....NO.
"Absolute Proof"
I was watching David Icke's recent interview with Alex Jones and he brilliantly summed up political correctness. You could very easily expand what he says to the forum as well. Just take a listen from 1 hour 24 minutes onwards.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX2wxkyuqo
Absolute Proof!!!!!!!!!!!
I think what these two guys say, and the way they say it, is very well represented on this forum:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf
Not pretending to have watched or anything, I'm aware of both guys and consider them utter fools. You're much smarter than to point us to them really, Miles.
David Icke and Alex Jones are smart, informed people. They both have their agendas of course, but I listen to them and a lot of others too. I disagree with them on all kinds of things, but I certainly consider their points of view and I think they are right on a lot of issues. You get a lot of good information from them. To just dismiss people as utter fools is all well and good, but it is easy to criticise and not suggest alternatives. It is something I do too, so I'm not having a go. You are an intelligent person, so what would you suggest is a good source of information? You get information in alternative media that you will never hear in the central bank slave, monarchy worshipping, PC British newspapers. I just try to pay attention to all of them and filter accordingly.
I don't like most media either, but these guys are really no better than any of the lot. If you believe 911 was an inside job, or that the "New World ORder" actually exists, I believe you are at best very poorly informed and wishing for such madness to be true. For as much as you bash the UK, there are several really good media outlets based there. I'm subscribed to the Economist, and I often check Reuters and the Independent online. They arent totally objective and the Independent often has garbage pop stuff, but there is also good breaking information there from people much more informed than these two. I'm sure you disagree.
And you can be sure that I disagree too. You have dismissed Alex Jones who is a really good source of information even if you disagree with his agenda he is certainly very well informed as miles has correctly stated. And also as miles has correctly stated you cannot simply dismiss him and because you don't like his hair style or the tone of his voice. Too many of you lot simply dismiss people like David Icke and Alex Jones because you don't like their hair style or the type of coat that they wear but that has s*** to do with the material that they are presenting. Please try to cast your net in a wider zone and this way you will not limit yourself to the myriad things that you might avail yourself of in this universe.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I'm not sure you even pretend to be genuine half the time you aren't posting gibberish, so I wasn't to interested in your opinion. I don't give a rats what they look like or how they dress and appear, I find it very hard to listen in detail to people who hold core beliefs which I consider nonsensical. I have given both of them a try, I think they are poorly informed, and most any evidence they put forward is purely anecdotal.
I read the Independent, but like with several British papers has gone downhill. There is so much that they just won't talk about. If you look at who owns these papers you start to see familiar patterns and understand how the news is working. Just take the absurd Corbyn bashing for instance and basically ignoring issues like fracking and the extent of the harmful policies being carried out by the Tories. The latest being a draconian housing bill that will devastate people. Meanwhile Labours reshuffle is all that matters. Bonkers and a very obvious agenda. And dont get me started on the Putin demonisation! At least with Infowars you get a fair take on other countries and regions that we have destroyed. If you read the British papers the Iraq war never happened and terrorists emerged from a vacuum in their shiny new jeeps. You dont get a perfect picture from anywhere but you do need different sources to try and get some balance. If you just read British papers a worldview is a very incomplete one.
The independent had an article today about British soldiers in Iraq standing trial for torture, it can't be that bad, I usually find decent articles on there. I am by no means well informed, I'm sure you read a lot more than I do and that's great. Do you believe the 911 wasn't a terrorist attack though? As I don't, it's very hard to take people convinced otherwise very seriously. It just doesn't add up, even your hero Chomsky doesn't go that far :P
Mind you, I always have time for Robert Fisk who seems able to say what we wants about the ME. Also as far as papers go the Indy is one of the better ones, but considering I think it is slipping says how much I respect the others. The Telegraph is appalling. And of course normal folk read horror rags like The Sun. Give me Infowars any day of the week over a lot of that. Plus Infowars has great guests like William Binney, Ron Paul, Max Keiser, and even Donald Trump is seeing the light with some of the things he is saying.
I am open minded and have argued both ways on 911. All I know is that the official narrative is flawed and there are a lot of things that do not add up. Building 7 falling on its own and the two towers falling like a controlled demolition obviously raises question marks. There is too much to go into here though. It's a huge topic.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
The Indy isn't terrible, I read through every morning. It does have information, but when it comes to economic analysis and honesty about Britains role in destabilising the world, I find it lacking. No mainstream paper will fully go there really. I do love Fisk though who will speak the truth about Israel.
Today I see the BBC is also doing its best to get in the fray by undermining a democratically elected party leader. The BBC, like most of the British media has an agenda. If you are Cameron you can cut everything, double the debt, bomb anywhere, sell off council homes, frack, let banks carry out widespread fraud and even allegedly have sex with a pigs head, all just dandy and yet look at the number of negative articles Corbyn is facing and for what? Because he is a man of peace and wants to nationalise over priced services? I defy anyone to say that the British media is respectable or fair in the way it covers 'news' really. RT is another source of information that you often won't find in the British press.
https://www.rt.com/uk/328284-bbc-dou...nation-corbyn/
Building 7 was hit by heavy debris from the north tower and several fires started inside. It was searched once over but then Larry Silverstein and the Fire chief ordered a halt to it as there was nobody inside and so many firemen had already died. There were ZERO casualties as a result of it's collapse. Major skyscrapers are designed to implode in the event of a major structural fault, so that they don't topple sideways. People who simply want to believe it was an inside job without objectively looking at the facts really creep me out. Have you read the 911 commission report? It's entirely uncontroversial.Quote:
Originally Posted by GandalfI am open minded and have argued both ways on 911. All I know is that the official narrative is flawed and there are a lot of things that do not add up. Building 7 falling on its own and the two towers falling like a controlled demolition obviously raises question marks. There is too much to go into here though. It's a huge topic.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
The Indy isn't terrible, I read through every morning. It does have information, but when it comes to economic analysis and honesty about Britains role in destabilising the world, I find it lacking. No mainstream paper will fully go there really. I do love Fisk though who will speak the truth about Israel.
hahahaha!!!! What rubbish.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pkingbuilding 7 was hit by heavy debris from the north tower and several fires started inside. It was searched once over but then larry silverstein and the fire chief ordered a halt to it as there was nobody inside and so many firemen had already died. There were zero casualties as a result of it's collapse. Major skyscrapers are designed to implode in the event of a major structural fault, so that they don't topple sideways. People who simply want to believe it was an inside job without objectively looking at the facts really creep me out. Have you read the 911 commission report? It's entirely uncontroversial.Quote:
Originally Posted by gandalfi am open minded and have argued both ways on 911. All i know is that the official narrative is flawed and there are a lot of things that do not add up. Building 7 falling on its own and the two towers falling like a controlled demolition obviously raises question marks. There is too much to go into here though. It's a huge topic.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
The indy isn't terrible, i read through every morning. It does have information, but when it comes to economic analysis and honesty about britains role in destabilising the world, i find it lacking. No mainstream paper will fully go there really. I do love fisk though who will speak the truth about israel.
Care to tell me why, you beacon of higher learning? :rolleyes: Where do your facts on the matter come from? If it was an inside job, why even bother with building 7?
Plenty of gold and secrets was stored in building seven. Did you not hear the owner say let's pull it let's pull it hurry up pull it pull it I had it pulled. The stupid piece of s*** said that a half an hour before the building at actually collapsed plus it was said several times afterwards
I have read excerpts, but I haven't sat down and read it in full. I have heard it was a whitewash. What you say does not tally with what I know about building 7 at all. There are a number of sites out there with a lot of information and from people who know far more than me. Give it a look as what you say above suggests you do not even consider alternative sources of information. The people who creep me out are statists that trust the system. Not that I am saying you are one, but if you were to believe the government then there would be WMD in Iraq, that the Taliban carried out 9-11, that ISIS appeared out the blue. Of course that is all gibberish and the story of 9-11 doesn't really hold together very well when you look into it either and that of course started the descent into madness.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pkingBuilding 7 was hit by heavy debris from the north tower and several fires started inside. It was searched once over but then Larry Silverstein and the Fire chief ordered a halt to it as there was nobody inside and so many firemen had already died. There were ZERO casualties as a result of it's collapse. Major skyscrapers are designed to implode in the event of a major structural fault, so that they don't topple sideways. People who simply want to believe it was an inside job without objectively looking at the facts really creep me out. Have you read the 911 commission report? It's entirely uncontroversial.Quote:
Originally Posted by GandalfI am open minded and have argued both ways on 911. All I know is that the official narrative is flawed and there are a lot of things that do not add up. Building 7 falling on its own and the two towers falling like a controlled demolition obviously raises question marks. There is too much to go into here though. It's a huge topic.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
The Indy isn't terrible, I read through every morning. It does have information, but when it comes to economic analysis and honesty about Britains role in destabilising the world, I find it lacking. No mainstream paper will fully go there really. I do love Fisk though who will speak the truth about Israel.
I'm not a shill, I think Politicians are all bought and paid for and the official narrative for going to war is usually complete BS anywhere. Suggesting that these same people actually orchestrated 911 is a different thing though, and that's what doesn't add up. Never mind that it's a nasty idea, it is giving them FAR to much credit. Nobody could have pulled that off as an inside job without it leaking out somehow, when you really think about what it would have taken. Who planted all the explosives? When, nobody saw them? Not one of them ever told a loved one or anybody else who wasn't completely involved, no deathbed confessions, yada yada yada.
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage
This is a very good website with far more concrete information that the sources you likely refer to, like it or not Miles. Obviously the narrative is set, but it does completely disprove, or provides far more likely explanations than most of the conspiracy nonsense if you actually read it. Building 7 is fairly straightforward really.
What Brock said was true though, the owner of the building admitted that they had it pulled down which is an odd thing to say. All 3 buildings went down in the same manner as a controlled demolition. Then of course there are the 1700 scientists and engineers that dispute the official narrative and the narrative of rescue workers whose voices have been ignored. Now would the typical congressman be in on it? No, very unlikely, but there are shadow forces at play beyond the knowledge of most including the President and you know that. It shouldn't be the case, but that's what Eisenhower warned about all those years ago. I will have a look at the site, but there are plenty of sites that counter the official narrative and people with expert knowledge too. Considering the unwillingness of officials to investigate properly also means there are inevitably a lot of question marks also.
There is a section on that site about building 7 which explains it in depth, you should read it and tell me what you think. Who are these 1700 scientists and engineers, or rescue workers you speak of? Care to point me to anyone remotely credible who gives any firsthand account to support an inside job? What kind of shadow powers do you think could have pulled this off? This will become a bit like arguing against religion, I suspect.
What kind of shadow powers would give weapons to Isis, or enforce financial tyranny through fiat, or start wars, or spy on people illegally? Shadow governments are wieldy, diverse, and notably silent and unnacountable. It is nothing like religion with nothing backing it up, it is all out there and with people in expensive buildings paid by the taxpayer. Just read some Chomsky, Griffin, Roberts, or Klein to get a general understanding. Maybe you already have, I don't know. I mostly just read books, so don't have many links, but just a look at Wiki will put you in touch with the 9-11 ideas and give you more info about the types of conspiracy and who says what. You have to admit there is a lot of good information out there and it doesn't really point in the direction of Saddam Hussein. Bit of a strawman to throw religion in there really, nothing alike.