-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
terrible fight. fury sucks!
So does Parker. 2nd rate title and 2nd rate fighters.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Parker wins 118-110 by 2 judges and the other a draw.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
I expect more from fury since he has all the ped pimples over his body.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
118-110...why does that score sound familiar?
Terry O'Connor scored it to Parker as well, that was a bit of a shock
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
I'm glad the right man lost!
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
I expect more from fury since he has all the ped pimples over his body.
They ain't ped pimples it's a minor case of leprosy, and he doesn't take peds he just eats lots of wild boar and hedgehogs
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
I do not want to see a rematch.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I do not want to see a rematch.
I can see me watching this entire card for nostalgic purposes in 20 years time.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I do not want to see a rematch.
I can see me watching this entire card for nostalgic purposes in 20 years time.
No way. You would be re-reading 1984.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
So bit of a crappy fight eh? Sounds like limitations of both on display and AJ will sleep comfortably tonight.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
That was fucking brilliant. Parkers mob went in for the obligatory post fight hoist onto the shoulders, dragged their feet and then thought fuck it, we aint won anyway. Fury, sure that he'd won continued to raise his hand long after 'and still' was announced.
Cue Tyson, Hughie, Peter, Warren (who wanted fuck all to do with the fight) to bombard Twitter with 'they dont like us' bullshit.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Shame.
I love the footwork from Fury...both fury cousins are big men but move better than anyone in the heavyweight divison today including Haye.
Fury will come again and learn from this..I only watched the 2nd half and felt fury probably nicked it.
Unlike the GGG fight, Canelo was connecting with quality shots whilst still on the backfoot..(had to throw that in!)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
So bit of a crappy fight eh? Sounds like limitations of both on display and AJ will sleep comfortably tonight.
Lol I doubt he even watched.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
£15 for this fight ?
Parker hasn't scored a KO win at world level , and the LEPROSEY KID cant break an egg.
Not even close to being a world title fight.
I thank you.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
The Leprosy Kid isn't going anywhere or winning any fans with his powder puff punching and running.
As for Parker he looks totally over rated.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Shit fight Fury tried to steal the title Parker one paced clueless world title my ass rubbish fight for those of you that spent £15 you were robbed.
I must say I wasted 36 minutes of my life watching this crap the under card rubbish.:vd:
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Anyone else think Pulev could outbox Parker?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VG_Addict
Anyone else think Pulev could outbox Parker?
Easily.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Hughie Fury looks like he's been set on fire and someone put it out with a golf shoe ;D
Isn't that associated with PED use?
Tyson has done himself no favours at all with his post fight rant
Mick Hennesey claiming Furys footwork was Ali esq ;D;D
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
1. Wilder
2. Joshua
3. Povetkin
4. Parker
5. Ortiz
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
1. Wilder
2. Joshua
3. Povetkin
4. Parker
5. Ortiz
@GaMo
Why do you put Wilder above AJ? is it just on power alone?
I've not heard many people say that they class him higher than AJ, they will say that he has a chance against him but not that he is actually better.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
1. Wilder
2. Joshua
3. Povetkin
4. Parker
5. Ortiz
@
GaMo
Why do you put Wilder above AJ? is it just on power alone?
I've not heard many people say that they class him higher than AJ, they will say that he has a chance against him but not that he is actually better.
He's had more fights and defended his title more than AJ. Joshua has the biggest win on his record but if you remove that win over Klitschko then I think Wilder has beaten the better fighters. Ortiz will be a bigger win than Palev too.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
I said I considered him among Pulev and Stiverne.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
I said I considered him among Pulev and Stiverne.
I think he is below.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Parker's lucky he's in this HW division. He'd never win a title in the 90s or 2000s.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VG_Addict
Parker's lucky he's in this HW division. He'd never win a title in the 90s or 2000s.
He's not as bad as Ruiz or Valuev
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Horrible to watch. I had it 115-113 Parker. Scores were crazy.
So is Parker 1st division heavyweight that you think he is?
I said I considered him among Pulev and Stiverne.
I think he is below.
Both those guys haven't done much more.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
He is training hard and got his love for boxing back.
He is ready to apply for his license back.
HMMMMMMM actually he is a fat bastard and as I've said many times I doubt very much if he will fight again.
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...tid=4269&stc=1
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
At least he's had a shave . 😀
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Old @ross must have been pleased that all that brilliant experience and knowledge Hughie gained from facing 50-year-old fat journeyman worked out.
You know... Joshua will be exposed against the best as he fights all weak chinned bums, but Hughie was getting vital rounds in against granite tough men that bring their wives and daughters to work their corner. He'll show his man strength when the right time comes.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
I got nothing against Hughie who for his part tends to keep his gob shut and his nose clean, unlike his cousin.
But we were supposed to be seeing the other 70% of Hughie weren't we? He was apparently operating at 30% up until this fight wasn't he? He's now injury/illness free and training in the woods like a lunatic. He still looked like shit on the scales and was by the looks of things even more passive/powder puff than ever.
Good to see Tyson in fine nick and chomping at the bit waiting for the green light from the BBOC. Forget the UKAD/Licensing stuff. The fucker is at least five stone away from a boxing ring.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Tyson and Parker ended up absolutely shitfaced on booze
Brilliant stuff.
http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2017/...with-wbo-champ
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
It says "Parker now seems set to fight the winner of the December 17 rematch between David Haye and Tony Bellew".
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
I reckon Whyte might get a go first ;)
Fury and Parker doing the haka ;D
http://www.givemesport.com/1154467-t...er?autoplay=on
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
It says "Parker now seems set to fight the winner of the December 17 rematch between David Haye and Tony Bellew".
Haye has a punchers chance and that's it. I'll be heavily rooting Parker against both those pricks.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
It says "Parker now seems set to fight the winner of the December 17 rematch between David Haye and Tony Bellew".
Haye has a punchers chance and that's it. I'll be heavily rooting Parker against both those pricks.
You know, so am I now.
I was a Haye fan but losing to Bellew showed me that he is injury prone and does not have what it takes any longer to become champion. Haye knows it but does not want to admit it.
-
Re: Parker V Fury 23/09/2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
It says "Parker now seems set to fight the winner of the December 17 rematch between David Haye and Tony Bellew".
Haye has a punchers chance and that's it. I'll be heavily rooting Parker against both those pricks.
You know, so am I now.
I was a Haye fan but losing to Bellew showed me that he is injury prone and does not have what it takes any longer to become champion. Haye knows it but does not want to admit it.
Looking back all he has been about is the money and fame not the legacy