Quote:
Have you actually read any of my posts here or are you just trolling again ?
I actually always read your entire posts....it's how I know that there's nothing in those posts of note and that is why I ask questions of you.
Quote:
"Your Second Amendment rights are under siege, but they will never, ever be under siege as long as I'm your president."
Well Hillary Clinton wanted to implement Australia's style of gun control in the United States so actually yes that statement is a fact regardless of your political leaning.
Quote:
“The idea that women were oppressed throughout history is an appalling theory. “
"Frozen served a political purpose: to demonstrate that a woman did not need a man to be successful. Anything written to serve a political purpose (rather than to explore and create) is propaganda, not art. Frozen was propaganda, pure and simple. Beauty and the Beast (the animated version) was not."
“Human emissions of carbon dioxide have saved life on Earth from inevitable starvation & extinction due to C02 “
“Look for your inspiration to the victorious lobster.”
“So, as I said already, women’s studies, and all the ethnic studies and racial studies groups, man, those things have to go and the faster they go the better. It would have been better had they never been part of the university to begin with as far as I can tell. Sociology, that’s corrupt. Anthropology, that’s corrupt. English literature, that’s corrupt. Maybe the worse offenders are the faculties of education. [...] I learned that law has actually become corrupt as well. “
1. Is presented without context at all and I can find nothing with it in context. I'd delve deeper before passing judgement on that comment.
2. Hollywood produces propaganda to push a political agenda that is indisputable. Producers, directors, executives, they know what they are doing and have admitted as much.
3. Again this is without context and I'm unable to find it in context but plants feed on CO2 animals feed on plants, he's not far off.
4. Yeah that's out of context and on it's own LOL very silly, but in context it's noteworthy and he makes a point because humans and lobsters share the same neurochemistry and in context he explains about hierarchies.
5. You can agree or disagree with his statement but it doesn't make it asinine. To YOU all of those classes and courses may be in the sweet spot of your political leanings but to an overwhelming majority those courses and subjects are way far left.
Quote:
Everyone that does not agree with him is dismissed as a post modernist who does not believe in logic. Like Ayn Rand he presents himself as the final word on rationality if you don't agree with him you are irrational. It's why he does not have to defend his incredibly weak pseudo science. Of course the Alt -right love him because they hate the same people, they too want to make themselves incredibly rich off the gullibility of others. The dollar is the bottom line.
He doesn't really believe in anything but selling merch and loving the smell of his own farts. The whole Myth thing and Jung are a staple part of arts and anthropology and everything he dismisses. He is so fucking willfully ignorant because he thinks again directly against what he preaches, and boy does he preach, that he is an expert in everything. He knows fuck all about an awful lot but so do those Proud Boys who subscribe to him.
He presents himself as the savior of the Western World as though the whole of academia are wrong and he is somehow the lone voice of reason. He does not even have a rudimentary understanding of philosophy much like Molyneux. He presents himself as an Alpha male father figure so Miles is drawn to him but actually he is clearly afraid of women. He pretends to embrace Nietzsche but then ignores Nietzsche on Christianity. He is therefore the embodiment of his own definition of a cherry picking post -modern mutha fucker
I don't believe that is the case, I think a lot of people who disagree with him end up proving his points for him. What is he saying? He's saying men should be proud and happy and there's a way to accomplish that and that masculinity is something that can be good, be responsible, be a hard worker, provide for your family, have a family, very simple things but he's met with such vitriol the people listening to him wonder why? Again with the pseudoscience accusation...what about it is pseudoscience? Care to get specific about that?
I guess you know better and could provide better paths to happiness and leading a rich fulfilled life? Would you care to lay out your theories?
He presents himself as a Psychologist who cares about the messages being sent to young people by other professors.
"He pretends to embrace Nietzsche but then ignores Nietzsche on Christianity." ....ok so he doesn't agree 100% with Nietzsche do you agree with anyone 100%?
Quote:
TRUMP
"The U.S. cannot allow EBOLA-infected people back. People that go to far away places to help out are great - but must suffer the consequences!"
Twitter, 2/9/14
"The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."
Twitter, 6/10/12
"The concept of shaking hands is absolutely terrible, and statistically I've been proven right."
Playboy, October 2004
“My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body.”
New York Post, 2011
1. Yes absolutely. Sorry that's extremely valid and correct.
2. It certainly seems that way. It also keeps the extremely poor well extremely poor.
3. OK so he doesn't like shaking hands but we're to believe he paid Russian hookers to piss on him and on some bed he was sleeping in???
4. Not an asinine proclamation just a strange statement for you to pick out and have issues with.
So what I'm seeing here is that you disagree with these folks and that's fine but it seems your disapproval stems from very petty things.
