Printable View
I never mentioned Scott or Thompson, I mentioned Swaby. Btw, How do we know Thompson wouldn't have done the same to Fury or Cunningham?Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
No, stats from my memory. Doesnt say on boxrec he was dropped by Scott.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
I also remember Thompson gving Haye a hiding and that was another 40 year old retired fighter.
Because neither of them have shit stamina. If you consider Tysons Thompson moment against Cunningham he passed that with flying colours, came through it and win by knockout. Haye couldnt blow someone away and fell apart.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraI never mentioned Scott or Thompson, I mentioned Swaby. Btw, How do we know Thompson wouldn't have done the same to Fury or Cunningham?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossNo, stats from my memory. Doesnt say on boxrec he was dropped by Scott.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
I also remember Thompson gving Haye a hiding and that was another 40 year old retired fighter.
"Tyson's Thompson moment" came in about the 3 rd round if I remember right. I should think he fucking did have enough stamina to recover. And even then he used his 5 stone weight advantage to lean all over Cunningham until he couldn't carry Fury no more and virtually fell over.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossBecause neither of them have shit stamina. If you consider Tysons Thompson moment against Cunningham he passed that with flying colours, came through it and win by knockout. Haye couldnt blow someone away and fell apart.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraI never mentioned Scott or Thompson, I mentioned Swaby. Btw, How do we know Thompson wouldn't have done the same to Fury or Cunningham?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossNo, stats from my memory. Doesnt say on boxrec he was dropped by Scott.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo Carnera
I also remember Thompson gving Haye a hiding and that was another 40 year old retired fighter.
Also, what does that say about Cunningham's stamina? How do we know he wouldn't lost to Thompson?
(I did ask that as well originally btw , please don't make me repeat every question I ask, this thread will end up a thousand pages long!!) 😄😄
Cunningham beat better fighters than Thompson did:rolleyes:
Wlad beat better fighters than Fury , but it didn't stop Fury beating him did it?Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
( forgive the lack of a "roll eyes" emoji, but I don't have one on my phone!)👏😏
Who was better than Fury!;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraWlad beat better fighters than Fury , but it didn't stop Fury beating him did it?Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
( forgive the lack of a "roll eyes" emoji, but I don't have one on my phone!)👏😏
What a ridiculous statement! Tyson has just proven himself better than any of Wlads beaten opponents..... Hard to swallow for some:eek:
My point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
No, you prick! I was replying to your pathetic statement and missed out "did" , but you knew that. So I'll put it right........Wlad beat better fighters than Fury DID , but it didn't stop Fury beating him did it?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWho was better than Fury!;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraWlad beat better fighters than Fury , but it didn't stop Fury beating him did it?Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
( forgive the lack of a "roll eyes" emoji, but I don't have one on my phone!)👏😏
What a ridiculous statement! Tyson has just proven himself better than any of Wlads beaten opponents..... Hard to swallow for some:eek:
Btw, all Tyson "proved" was that he was better than Wlad on the night." Absolutely nothing to do with his previous opponents.
Primo your post read at is read and I replied as I read it.
Who?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterMy point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
I have said already. Valuev and Ruiz.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWho?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterMy point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
You think Valuev is better than Huck?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI have said already. Valuev and Ruiz.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWho?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterMy point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
Even the mansour that Cunningham fought would beat the Ruiz that Haye fought!
Valuev is better than Huck.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossYou think Valuev is better than Huck?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI have said already. Valuev and Ruiz.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWho?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterMy point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
Even the mansour that Cunningham fought would beat the Ruiz that Haye fought!
Ruiz was at least champion and beaten good fighters so better than Mansour.
Come on master!Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterValuev is better than Huck.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossYou think Valuev is better than Huck?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI have said already. Valuev and Ruiz.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWho?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterMy point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
Even the mansour that Cunningham fought would beat the Ruiz that Haye fought!
Ruiz was at least champion and beaten good fighters so better than Mansour.
Your trying to telleveryone Valuev was better then Huck? Really!?
Ruiz may have been better but at the point and remember it was you that used this phrase "at the point" Haye fought a retired 40 year old Ruiz, if that Ruiz was fighting Mansour he would loose. He probably wouldnt have made it to the 9th!
Ruiz came at a career low and was ready as he wanted desperately to win. He thought Haye would be there to be beat. Haye knocked him down early and the rest was history.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossCome on master!Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterValuev is better than Huck.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossYou think Valuev is better than Huck?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI have said already. Valuev and Ruiz.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWho?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterMy point was Haye has beaten better fighters than Cunningham. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by ross
Even the mansour that Cunningham fought would beat the Ruiz that Haye fought!
Ruiz was at least champion and beaten good fighters so better than Mansour.
Your trying to telleveryone Valuev was better then Huck? Really!?
Ruiz may have been better but at the point and remember it was you that used this phrase "at the point" Haye fought a retired 40 year old Ruiz, if that Ruiz was fighting Mansour he would loose. He probably wouldnt have made it to the 9th!