If Assange goes out in daylight does he not turn into dust or something?
https://cdn3.whatculture.com/images/...6/lSfhE3P4.jpg
Printable View
If Assange goes out in daylight does he not turn into dust or something?
https://cdn3.whatculture.com/images/...6/lSfhE3P4.jpg
You're the Q expert. You're the one who believes all this crap. You tell me what Q has said. All I'm saying is that either Q or some other nut has claimed that there are a whole bunch of deep staters who've been arrested and charged but somehow Trump is still letting them walk around free, except they're wearing ankle monitors.
So what has Q said Lyle? What version of events do you currently believe to be true?
Prosecutor: Man at N.M. compound trained kids for school shooting
http://www.kwch.com/content/news/Chi...490352381.html
Ooooh well that looks FUN! Teaching children how to shoot up schools...oh and what is the main dude's name...Siraj Wahhaj son of the Imam of the same name, the Imam who was a witness for the Blind Sheikh after the WTC bombing in 1993.....who would have guessed it.
:dontknow:
Skripal attack: Russia faces US sanctions over Novichok use which is about time. The US state department have said it not Trump. Is that a worry?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45122723
So, no sanctions trumps a Putin lackey, sanctions and trump didn’t want them and he is still a lackey. He has already done quite a bit. I don’t think trying to improve relations is a bad thing. The US dropped the ball with Russia when yeltsin went through his shit. It was another “we conquered you” and didn’t follow up. I saw in a poll a lot of Russian citizens feel that way. Who got Yeltsin in, “us meddling” and shit got so bad it opened the door to Putin. Putin was put in by the oligarchs as they figured he was a lower level KGB and would be easy to influence. Instead, he bamboozled them. It’s just another case of the CIA and government misreading shit and now here we are. I don’t particularly like Putin, I think he is a wanna be Xi in China. Still the dude bows how to stay in power and he did bring Russia back from becoming a mob state. Only now Putin is the mob boss. I’d love to here what Gorbachev has said about Putin. I’m sure He is very disappointed on how things turn out. Putin has his dractors but he really plays on Russian nationalism. In the US we tend to celebrate individual accomplishments. Russia is really nationalistic and looks at the whole country more than the individual. A recent poll I read stated the Russian people have no interest in a western type capatalist and they resent the US for dropping the ball when shit fell apart. One issue was the cia had greatly underestimated the disarray Russia was in with its ethic provinces and what a powder keg they were after the fall. It was mainly us, and England who sped up the process of the USSR collapse, then we meddled and installed some incompetent puppets. We were decent nation builders after WW2 with japan and other countries we bombed the shit out of but fortunately I think we are learning that time has passed. I’m not gonna pretend I have the right answer, Putin will be in power even after he steps down, prop till he dies. But look, the sanctions are in place. None of us have seen evidence of all this shit Putin is accused of. No matter what trump tries to do with Russia it will be attacked. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...1.html%3famp=y
It’s just a shame. Russia isn’t a big country and our bigger problem is with Chinese meddling going back to Clinton till this very day. Take a look how many in Congress, many the same ones who attack trump, are receiving money piped through China. This most recent thing with Don Jr is a joke. He told Congress in his interview that he met with them for opposition research. Straight out he said it. Now it’s being twisted like he never did and it’s now breaking news. Anyway, sorry for the babble, I’m having insomnia
Attempting and then failing to obtain the jerk on Clinton is not a crime nor would it have been a crime to attempt to obtain the dirt and received the dirt. The whole thing is a left-wing con job to try to Trump up charges on Trump who did not break any laws
There is no such crime as "COLLUSION"
What would the intelligence community's 'insurance policy' against Trump look like?
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-hou...XJwSnM.twitter
Let’s begin in the realm of the fanciful.
Assume, for the sake of argument, that powerful, connected people in the intelligence community and in politics worried that a wildcard Trump presidency, unlike another Clinton or Bush, might expose a decade-plus of questionable practices. Disrupt long-established money channels. Reveal secret machinations that could arguably land some people in prison.
What exactly might an “insurance policy” against Donald Trump look like?
He would have to be marginalized at every turn. Strategies would encompass politics, the courts, opposition research and the media. He’d have to become mired in lawsuits, distracted by allegations, riddled with calls for impeachment, hounded by investigations. His election must be portrayed as the illegitimate result of a criminal or un-American conspiracy.
To accomplish this, bad actors in the intel community could step up use of surveillance tools as a weapon to look for dirt on Trump before his inauguration. They could rely on dubious political opposition research to secretly argue for wiretaps, plant one or more spies in the Trump campaign, then leak to the press a mix of true and false stories to create a sense of chaos.
Once Trump is in office, a good insurance policy would call for neutralizing the advisers seen as most threatening, including his attorney general. The reigning FBI director could privately send the implicit message that as long as Trump minds his own business, he won’t be named as a target. When the president asks the FBI director to lift the cloud and tell the public their president isn’t under investigation, the FBI director could demur and allow a storm of innuendo to build. Idle chatter benefits the plot. There would be rampant media leaks, both true and false, but none of them would benefit Trump.
:scratchchin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljkg-cRGfZo
MMMMM delicious ;D
Gotta love Michael Moore
Calling President Donald Trump an “evil genius” plotting to declare himself dictator for life, filmmaker and activist Michael Moore said his new film ‘Fahrenheit 11/9’ will mobilize the liberal #Resistance majority.
Moore’s new documentary, scheduled to hit theaters on September 21, seeks to “bring Trump down” before the November midterms. The title is a retread of his 2004 work ‘Fahrenheit 9/11,’ with the reversed date referring to Election Day 2016.
Trump is an “evil genius” who has “no intention of leaving the White House,” Moore told HuffPost in an email interview on Thursday, after the trailer for his new film was released. The clip refers to Trump as “the last president of the United States.”
…
Help is on the way from “the most unlikely of places,” Moore said. “The resistance ― the true resistance ― is not coming from the Democratic Party or from the liberal establishment. I can’t reveal too much right now, but there is a real insurgency taking place. I don’t know if it will succeed or not. It might be too late.”
Is he suggesting a military coup?
Donald Trump is first and foremost a businessman, Freedom. He'll conduct business with blacks, Chinese, Mexicans.... even Martians if it'll help his bottom line.
That doesn't mean he's not racist, doesn't say racist comments, or even secretly holds racist views.
Donald Sterling (another Donald) had a professional basketball team full of blacks..... and he was one of the most racist individuals you'll ever see.
Omarosa says Trump is a racist who uses N-word – and claims there is tape to prove it.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...rentice-memoir
Michael Moore is a hypocrite IMO. He was almost mute during the Obama years. Yet now is called to action for some good old propaganda and spin. I have lost respect for him and will boycott his work. He is one of these inflexible ideologues really and they are the worst kinds of people. People who think they know everything only know one thing. That generally means control by force as everyone else is wrong.
Donald Trump is not racist, doesn't say racist comments, or even secretly hold racist views.
Get over this snowflake shit
@Master
*******SO WHAT?*******
Oh so you know him personally and can attest to that, right?
https://media1.tenor.com/images/bd3a...itemid=4393007
Nobody was calling him racist before he ran for President....and would a racist President care so much about the unemployment numbers of blacks, hispanics, and asians?
Once people wake up to how they have been lied to and manipulated by the media and average politicians there's going to be hell to pay.
I can't speak for everybody, but I wasn't calling him racist before he ran for President because I honestly didn't delve that much into his affairs. Once he became POTUS he's under the microscope. You saying he cares about the unemployment numbers of blacks, Hispanics and Asians sounds a bit like truth by inclusion. He cares about unemployment numbers period. By attempting to get unemployment figures down, he's bound to pick up the different demographics in the process.
Here's the thing, Lyle. Not everyone forms their opinion of Trump strictly by what they get fed by the media. Trump does enough of his own talking, Tweeting, and acting out, that it provides ample opportunity upon which to form an opinion. Some of us are more than well aware that much of the mainstream media has it in for Trump. But give us credit for knowing that, and reaching our own opinions about Trump.
I've never said he hasn't accomplished some good things. But I'll stand by my opinion that he's just another racist, sexist asshole. I can't wait till the day that someone takes that office and does a good job also, while at the same time being a decent human being and leader by example. Trump is neither of those.
Meaning he values results over race ergo he's not a racist.
How has Trump been racist? Surely you have examples of him being racist it wouldn't just be a "feeling" you have about the guy. He said rapists are coming across the border...that's a fact, it's not a fact that's mentioned in many newspapers and websites but it's undeniable. There are SOME people coming to America looking to do good things and then there are others...to deny that there are others is to deny reality.
Sexist?!?!?! Now he might be a bit of a womanizer but sexist he's most certainly not. He hired Barbara Res to build Trump Tower, he hired Kellyanne Conway to run his campaign, Sarah Huckabee Sanders to be his Press Secretary....I mean yeah he's been around with the marriages but sexist?!?! That's a new one.
Blacks are starting to support Donald Trump in a big way, hispanics and asians too....the reason the mainstream media is pushing the whole "He's a racist" narrative is because IF Trump achieves success in those communities there is no future for the Democrat party, NONE, identity politics is their bread and butter and if that goes by the wayside then they are royally fucked.
No, it does not. Obviously we'll continue to disagree on this, and that's ok. But saying Trump cares mostly about unemployment results across the board doesn't preclude him from being a racist. I just don't see it. Trump is a businessman first..... everything else comes in second. Trump worships the almighty dollar. Like I said once before, Trump will hire an extraterrestrial alien if it's going to help his bottom line. It doesn't mean he wouldn't be racist against aliens. You can hold racist views and STILL go about the business or running your business.
Ok, the rapists comments. What Trump said exactly was that Mexico was "sending" rapists across the border. Mexico is doing no such thing. Trump is guilty of a poor choice or words like he is 99.999% of the time. The tongue engages before the brain filter can kick in. For a New York mogul, maybe that's not a bad thing. For a POTUS..... that's an incredibly bad thing. Trump could've gotten his message across in more acceptable and decent language, instead of insulting a whole country. Everybody with a brain knows that among the Mexicans that are crossing the border, some rapists, criminals and drug dealers are getting in. But is Mexico in fact "SENDING" them across the border? It's insulting..... and comes off as racist.
Sexist? Yes... very much so. Again, who cares who he hires? God only knows why anyone would EVER hire Kellyanne Conway to do ANYTHING, other than take out the trash. What I base my comments on again are his own remarks. Hey.... neither you nor I like Mika Brzezinski very much but..... c'mon man. For a POTUS to make remarks about her bleeding from a bad facelift? Would Trump say that to a man? Hell no. And please don't make me go and drag out every single offensive thing he's ever said about different women, every time aiming at their appearance. What in hell does a President of the United States have to be calling women pigs, fat, ugly, and whatever else he chooses to call them when he's mad at one of them? I'm sorry I don't have a stat sheet or graph to pull out at the moment..... but any POTUS who is supposed to be looked up to, and lead by example..... and behaves like he does, in general..... just deserves to be called a racist, sexist asshole 10 times over.
Now, if you'd like to debate how he's really a good President, we could do that. But to me, he's still a giant asshole.
If he's a businessman first then like Don King the only color he cares about is GREEN...not black, brown, red, yellow, or white. Maybe you could be a racist and still be successful in business but you don't help your odds if that is what you're doing...for example:I'm a massive Red Sox fan Tom Yawkey made the Red Sox the LAST team to get a black player that hurt them immensely. Donald Sterling former owner of the LA Clippers...massive racist and everyone knew it for ages, and their teams sucked all the time because nobody wanted to play for that asshole. Donald Trump has had talks with guys like Jim Brown, yes an NFL legend but also a civil rights legend and Jim Brown has said that Trump isn't racist, Kanye West a guy who said "George Bush doesn't care about black people" said Trump isn't a racist...who is saying Trump is racist??? Trump called Omorosa a dog, but she broke the law...he welcomed her to the White House she HAPPILY signed an NDA and then was the biggest leaker out of the White House yeah "dog" is KIND considering what she did.
80% of women crossing the border illegally are raped. 80%. Trump said "Bad hombres" and "They aren't sending their best" and those are true comments.
Hiring practices show his intent, his belief that a woman can do the job of a man....Kellyanne Conway might not be your favorite but she's the first ever woman to engineer a Presidential campaign win...so let that sink in. Trump punches back, Mika Brzenski says a lot of petty shit about Trump and he swung back and nailed her right in the facelift...."don't start none, won't be none" Trump doesn't care who it is that is swinging at him, he'll slam them back and it'll hurt. That's not sexism that's equal opportunity.
Pizzagate's not rrrr....
Judge refuses to toss lawsuit accusing Harvey Weinstein of sex trafficking
https://pagesix.com/2018/08/14/harve...n-new-lawsuit/
301 ‘Predator Priests’ Named In Pa. Grand Jury Sex Abuse Report: ‘They Were Raping Little Boys & Girls’
https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2018...port-released/
....real :-X
[QUOTE=TitoFan;1487213][QUOTE=El Kabong;1487204]here's a real gem by @TitoFan So Tito "not everybody forms their opinions about him based on what they get from the media?"
Isn't that in direct contradiction to what you just asked me? You asked me how do I know about all this, do I know him personally?
so you were saying that a person cannot get their opinions by the media or by knowing him personally. In what Manner then pray tell would you get your opinion from my friend? Osmosis?
[QUOTE=brocktonblockbust;1487254][QUOTE=TitoFan;1487213]
I'll indulge you this once.
When you see Trump speak on television, it's not the media putting words into his mouth or "translating" what he's saying.
You don't need to know Trump personally to see him on television.
When you see a Tweet from Trump, it's not the media fabricating a "fake" Tweet and putting that falsification out there on TV.
You don't need to know Trump personally to read his Tweets.
Now..... when you READ opinion columns on Trump, or see news coverage on Trump with talking heads spouting their opinion... THAT'S the media feeding people what they want them to believe.
I hope this helps.
]Well since I don't know him personally which is a ridiculous question and since I don't believe the fake news media then where do you think I get my opinion from? From his very tweets and from his very statements on live TV. So there that's how I know that he is not a racist
Neither of us is going to win this argument, since it's all a matter of opinion anyway.
Suffice it to say my own opinion is that Trump is a racist, sexist asshole... who says shit not fit for a POTUS to say. He demeans the office. No matter what good he does in issues like unemployment, the economy, etc.... he's still an asshole. One thing doesn't preclude the other. Unfortunately, he has forever lowered the bar on the expectations on what Presidential behavior ought to be.
Personally, and I've said this time and time again, I would respect someone's opinion SOOO HUGELY if they would just come out and say "You know... in my opinion Trump is doing a good job as President in the issues I care about. Admittedly, he's a bit of an asshole, and I wish his personality was more fit for the office of President of the United States. But I still support him."
That alone would win me over and make me think I'm dealing with a straightforward, objective, feet-on-the-ground kind of guy.
But that will never happen. Which is why I absolutely LOATHE politics. People are incapable of separating one thing from the other. It's either all good.... or all bad. What an incredibly simplistic view to have of the world!!
I know that those are opinions you hold I'm just wondering what those opinions are based on. Are they based on actual events and facts or just how you feel?
If the bar for being President hadn't already been lowered to "OMG a black dude!" and "Well his last name is Bush" and "Well sure he got a BJ in the Oval office from a 19 year old intern...AND?!?!!?"
Have people NOT said this? "You know... in my opinion Trump is doing a good job as President in the issues I care about. Admittedly, he's a bit of an asshole, and I wish his personality was more fit for the office of President of the United States. But I still support him." We know who the guy is, we ALL know who Donald Trump is....and he's crushing being President right now. He's helped the Korea's end their war, no other president has done that and there have been 10 who have had the opportunity to do that, they all failed. He allowed Mad Dog Mattis to crush ISIS and Al Qaeda. He's brought our economy back, he's put people back to work, he has people feeling a pride in being American again when all opposed are calling proud Americans "Nazis, racist, bigot, anti-gay, xenophobic"......shit the other candidate called half of Trump's supporters (which would be roughly 31 million people) "Deplorables" and "Irredeemable" but it's like people don't understand that at all.
They are based on actual events and facts. Hearing Trump talk on TV and how he expresses himself about Mexicans is enough of a fact for me. Tell me.... would it have been possible to double down on the Mexico-U.S. border and expressed concern for the illegal immigrant situation without pissing off an entire country? We both know the answer to that question. Trump shoots off the hip when talking. Like I said before, it's ok for a New York real estate mogul to do that.... for not for the President of the United States.
None of those alluded to spoke or behaved like Trump does. Again, you and I both know that. Looking for faults in the previous Presidents isn't going to make Trump's warts magically disappear. I've already expressed my huge disappointments with Obama and Bush. I haven't spoke too much about Clinton, but for the purposes of this argument, I don't feel I need to. By expressing my disappointments, it should neutralize part of your counter. As much as you hated Obama, at least he spoke like a Presidential figure. That may mean shit to someone like Brock and many other Trump fans..... but it means something to me and many of us who expect more magnanimous behavior from a POTUS than we do from Joe from the street corner. Bush was a moron, but he managed not to piss off gigantic groups of people by uttering street talk garbage. Trump has no filter, Lyle. If you're fine with that, fine. I call it lowering the bar for being President, because from here on out there is no reason to expect anything other than a "Tweeting", insult-hurling, chip-on-the-shoulder, trash-talking President. Yes..... absolutely I call that lowering the bar.
The answer to that question would be "no", Lyle. There's a reason for my wish. Every time I say something good about Trump and follow it up with a "but"........ it's the "but" that gets leaped on like raw steak in the lion's den at the zoo. No mention about the good. "No, no, no....... our man has been criticized for something..... and that CANNOT be." I'm telling you, it's tiring and very telling. Hence my frustration discussing politics with anybody. Either the guy walks on water..... or he's the devil's incarnation, depending on your affiliation. To me, it erodes credibility to arguments.
So parsing language and softening the tone and being nice and kind and gentle and cuddly would make a difference? #1 That's not who Trump is #2 It's not why he got elected #3 It would make him no different than any of the MANY spineless weasels in DC who say they work for the citizens of this country but really do no such thing at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Meanwhile former President of Mexico Vicente Fox chastises Trump at every single opportunity....how did HE treat illegals in his country? Oh he didn't allow them to stay AT ALL, regardless of children or refugees or whatever the fuck.
Mexico is a shithole country and it has no right to be. It has all the natural resources in the world and it would still fuck up a free lunch. The people, there are GREAT Mexican people and I'd love to have some in America but we don't get them, we get rapists and murderers and leeches on our society. Who is paying for illegal immigrant kids to go to school? The parents who pay no property taxes because they rent? Oh no, not them, it's people like ME and are the illegal immigrant children making our public schools better or worse? Yeah so FUCK being nice to lawbreakers. Trump is spitting fire because it connects with the people suffering under this horseshit.
And Trump is more liked than those alluded to. Check the polls, he's one of the most liked President among Republicans in HISTORY and this is despite 90%+ negative media coverage.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Doesn't take much talent to read a teleprompter and not ever EVER have to stand up for previous votes or beliefs. Obama switched from Anti-Gay Marriage to Pro-Gay Marriage without a peep from ANYONE. He voted "present" meaning he didn't take a stand at all several times while he was a state senator and junior senator.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
When the "but" is directly tied to how he got elected that might be a reason. Is Trump rough around the edges? Hell yes and it helps him because Republicans since Reagan was shot have been pussies when attempting to stand up to anyone opposing them....finally Trump who doesn't give a fuck how he'll come across (because the media are going to make him the bad guy regardless) hammers anyone in his path. I like that, I enjoy that, I LOVE seeing the press wet their collective pants because Trump calls them out of their bullshit stories....because for a long time they've been printing bullshit stories and 0 people have held them accountable and that has been going on for decades.Quote:
The answer to that question would be "no", Lyle. There's a reason for my wish. Every time I say something good about Trump and follow it up with a "but"........ it's the "but" that gets leaped on like raw steak in the lion's den at the zoo
I can't understand this pardon me but anal fixation on what is quote unquote okay or what is quote unquote presidential. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
WTF YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THAT FECES UP
But I especially got a kick out of Tito fans saying about Trump talking bad about Mexicans
bwaaaaHAHAHA
he can't be serious he has to be taking a dig, we must just be getting trolled here
FORMER FBI agent Peter Stzrok has been fired (finally) now that he has been fired for bias the Mueller probe SHOULD come to a quick end seeing how it was Stzrok's "evidence" which got this ball rolling to start with.
Next up the Ohr's Bruce and Nellie....Bruce will be testifying in front of Congress this month and Nellie's roll in this will be discussed I am certain.
Cassius Clay didn't "act like a HW Champ"
Jimi H ndrix
Cassius Clay didn't "act like a HW Champ"
Jimi Hendrix "didn't act like" a traditional guitarist
Michael Jackson wasn't a "traditional" dancer
ATTN: TITO: THEY ALL BROKE THE MOLD, ACTED UN-"WHATEVER"
SO, MY FRIEND, GOES DON JOHN TRUMP
😎😎😎😎😎