Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Read my signature below not the ZAB one. ;D
The 2nd one. Does that make $en$e?
This was before ZAB-PBF and after ZAB-PBF had faught.
Now this is funny. So since your'e throwin out all these supportive questions of Margarito...let me ask you this...about your little signature...you do realize that the man that said that was once the promoter of one of the top talents in the sport today right? You do realize that? You do realize that there is a lot of animosity out there between Bobby A & Little Floyd? Right?
Now...as you said...NUFF SAID.
Listening to something Bob Arum said...WTF?
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!! WackOff you crack me up.
Fine disreguard my signature.
But watch this clip. Pay close attention to the last words. Thats some funny shet!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyIQI...elated&search=
Now your gonna tell me that Bob Arum put George Lucas behind this to do some special effects?
Please.... ;D
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s reco
Quote:
Originally Posted by shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
People talk about PBF this & that....... He want's to be the KING at 147 'undisputed' champ well theres a dispute. Tony holds a belt in order to be 'undisputed' he would have own WBC, IBF, WBA & WBO.
RJJ undisputed owned....what? 8 belts at one. Thats fwocken undisputed, whos gonna dispute that.
Its simple people quit making it so hard.
It's even simpler actually. The alphabet straps and "unification" have absolutely nothing to do with being "undisputed" champ. There's a maximum of one champ per division--by definition an "undisputed" champ. Right now that's Baldomir. Tony has a strap from a sanctioning body--doesn't mean S*** (except that now he has to fight Williams--haha).
cc bro you know it. Margarito holds a belt, Baldomir holds a championship.
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s reco
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Phenomena
CC Mick,brilliant points all the way through. And since when did Floyd become so brilliant at picking names, Oscar could say to him who was the last threat you fought to face me,in fact who won before you fought them? Floyd is a dumbass.
Bro that's a little harsh, especially seeing as nearly everyone wants to see that fight. Oscar knows Floyd is the best out there at the moment & that's where the money is!
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Read my signature below not the ZAB one. ;D
The 2nd one. Does that make $en$e?
This was before ZAB-PBF and after ZAB-PBF had faught.
Now this is funny. So since your'e throwin out all these supportive questions of Margarito...let me ask you this...about your little signature...you do realize that the man that said that was once the promoter of one of the top talents in the sport today right? You do realize that? You do realize that there is a lot of animosity out there between Bobby A & Little Floyd? Right?
Now...as you said...NUFF SAID.
Listening to something Bob Arum said...WTF?
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!! WackOff you crack me up.
Fine disreguard my signature.
But watch this clip. Pay close attention to the last words. Thats some funny shet!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyIQI...elated&search=
Now your gonna tell me that Bob Arum put George Lucas behind this to do some special effects?
Please.... ;D
That was in business suits in a formal setting. Fact is Margarito hasn't earned a shot at Floyd. He was right in calling out Floyd, but you have to make some noise then make people take notice by taking someone of merit out. Margarito and Arum haven't followed through on the last part. Williams beat Mathysse, called out Margarito, make some noise and then beat Mitchell. Now Margarito has to fight him, at least imo. I was all for the Margarito to face Floyd stuff for a while, but Margarito froze and waited for Mayweather to make his move. He should have taken the Mitchell fight and then Floyd would really be hardpressed not to face him unless it was in favor of someone like Baldo or even (though I don't think so) De La Hoya.
Fact is, by remaining idle when waiting for Floyd, Arum and Margarito have helped Floyd's cause in his reasoning for not facing him.
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Amat,I agree with you that Tony should be more active but fact is,and I have had this verified,he has beaten more top 10 contenders than anyone else at WW. It's like a B Hop situation,where he was the man at his weight without really having any names on the resume before he beat Oscar and Tito. And IF Tony gets by the rock hard and skilled Clottey and Williams,he deserves the big fights more than anyone firstly and secondly,who is PBF to decide wether who his opponents have fought is acceptable? When did he ever fight someone live? Can we even consider Baldo that? We shall find out the truth when/if Tony gets by these tough fighters and after the Oscar fight but you have to look at it from Margarito#s perspective,he's been unbeaten at the weight longer than Baaldo,fought more dangerous fighters and been ducked by name ones.And he's still being asked to prve himself. I just hope Shane Mosley steps up to the plate next year!!! >:mad
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
I'm not a Bob arum fan, but I am a Margarito fan. And Cintron may be shot right now but Margarito shot what talent he had and destroyed his chin. He basically shortened or ended the career of Cintron to the point that he will never be a title challenger. The biggest whooping Floyd put on anyone was the 5 knockdowns of Corrales which should ruin a fighter, but Corrales became champ after it. I've never seen Floyd end a fighters career as a prize fighter when they are held in high regard the way Margarito ended Cintrons, and maybe Calzaghe ended Lacy's
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes
I'm not a Bob arum fan, but I am a Margarito fan. And Cintron may be shot right now but Margarito shot what talent he had and destroyed his chin. He basically shortened or ended the career of Cintron to the point that he will never be a title challenger. The biggest whooping Floyd put on anyone was the 5 knockdowns of Corrales which should ruin a fighter, but Corrales became champ after it. I've never seen Floyd end a fighters career as a prize fighter when they are held in high regard the way Margarito ended Cintrons, and maybe Calzaghe ended Lacy's
Lacy's career has not ended!!?! And Cintron is fine,he's going to win the IBF title come October!! I have no idea what your point is!! ;D :D
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
My point is that Margarito ended the career of Cintron as a contender. I've never seen Floyd do that to a prospect that was held in very high regard. Who is Cintron fighting for the IBF title?
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Cintron is fighting someone names Mark Suarez,who is supposed to be decent.
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
For the IBF title in what division? 147? is that the title? Who had the IBF title?
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
IBF title was owned by Floyd I think who gave it up and now Cintron and Suarez are number 1 contenders and of course,it's at 147.
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Phenomena
It's like a B Hop situation,where he was the man at his weight without really having any names on the resume before he beat Oscar and Tito.
El Gamo...it's nothing like a B-Hop situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Phenomena
I just hope Shane Mosley steps up to the plate next year!!! >:mad
Why do you hope Mosley steps up...I know you don't want to see Tony beaten down that badly? ;D
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s reco
Quote:
Originally Posted by galaxy76
Quote:
Originally Posted by shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
People talk about PBF this & that....... He want's to be the KING at 147 'undisputed' champ well theres a dispute. Tony holds a belt in order to be 'undisputed' he would have own WBC, IBF, WBA & WBO.
RJJ undisputed owned....what? 8 belts at one. Thats fwocken undisputed, whos gonna dispute that.
Its simple people quit making it so hard.
It's even simpler actually. The alphabet straps and "unification" have absolutely nothing to do with being "undisputed" champ. There's a maximum of one champ per division--by definition an "undisputed" champ. Right now that's Baldomir. Tony has a strap from a sanctioning body--doesn't mean S*** (except that now he has to fight Williams--haha).
cc bro you know it. Margarito holds a belt, Baldomir holds a championship.
Opinions opinions but Margarito is the true people's champ--just read the the majority of boxing forums instead of listening to dweebs like these http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-1fIEpBy90
These buffoons insist that Margarito backed down from Oscar’s Ishe but look who Ishe is fighting tonight and you will understand a bit about these pretty boy propagandist
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by maracho
Quote:
Originally Posted by galaxy76
Quote:
Originally Posted by shza
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
People talk about PBF this & that....... He want's to be the KING at 147 'undisputed' champ well theres a dispute. Tony holds a belt in order to be 'undisputed' he would have own WBC, IBF, WBA & WBO.
RJJ undisputed owned....what? 8 belts at one. Thats fwocken undisputed, whos gonna dispute that.
Its simple people quit making it so hard.
It's even simpler actually. The alphabet straps and "unification" have absolutely nothing to do with being "undisputed" champ. There's a maximum of one champ per division--by definition an "undisputed" champ. Right now that's Baldomir. Tony has a strap from a sanctioning body--doesn't mean S*** (except that now he has to fight Williams--haha).
cc bro you know it. Margarito holds a belt, Baldomir holds a championship.
Opinions opinions but Margarito is the true people's champ--just read the the majority of boxing forums instead of listening to dweebs like these
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-1fIEpBy90
These buffoons insist that Margarito backed down from Oscar’s Ishe but look who Ishe is fighting tonight and you will understand a bit about these pretty boy propagandist
So you say that it's not Margarito's fault he has fought a majority of bums and excuse him. Yet you're saying that if it's true that Ishe wanted to fight Margarito and didn't get it so that Ishe is fighting a bum tonight, that it's Ishe's fault for fighting the bum and thats the reason Margarito shouldn't fight him ???
::**
Re: Mayweather on Margarito "Spot two name fighters on that mother-f*****'s record!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Then PBF decides an already done with ZAB, who had just lost to Baldomir and WAS NO LONGER a champ in any way shape or form.
Nah ... that fight was already made and waiting. Had Floyd not fought Judah based on his loss to Baldomir he'd have been scorned for that, too. Baldomir hadn't beaten Gatti yet at that point, and his win over Judah ... it might have been a fluke. Even though we know it wasn't now we didn't necessarily then.
At any rate my point is that the Floyd - Judah fight had been there waiting to be fought, and the idea that Judah was already "done" ... I'm not sure it's even true now. I don't think Zab ever really stood up.
I have this funny feeling that Floyd is just going to beat everybody, in fairly outstanding fashion, and never get beat ... he'll walk through Hatton ... and he'll face the best fighters in his class and beat them handily ... and when his career is over, unblemished and undefeated, the complaint will be: "Yeah, but who did he ever fight?"
Even if he fights the best out there, it will only show that he fought no one that could really challenge him. And that will mean that he is less than he could have been, because of his competition.
Anybody digging the logic?
i did see the first castillo fight, and think PBF lost a close one ... he's not 100% invincible. I think he beats anyone but DLH though from here on out.
