Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
kirilov fight
Perez deserved the win
no way, he was dominated in that fight
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Silverio Ortiz beating current WBC Lightweight Interim champ. David Diaz.
Truly disgusting, the commentators wen't as far as apologizing and saying how disgusted they were to have been present/a part of the fight.
I swear I felt bad as they showed Silverios face in disbelieve.
John-JMM: Clearly another hometown favor, the worst decision here was making 'Nacho' Beristein your manager.
Viloria-Nino II: What fwocken fight were the refs. watching?
Duddy-Campas: Fucken refs. I think it had to do with it being St. Patricks day that day or weekend.
Ike-Forrest: Was horrible to hear. Come to think of it probably on par with the Ortiz-Diaz fight.
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
kirilov fight
Perez deserved the win
no way, he was dominated in that fight
The knock down he scored alloweded him to edge it. It was close but I think he deserved it
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by albsur2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Spinks, Lacy, and Peter all winning. Spinks and Lacy weren't even questionable IMO. I had Peter up by a round, but I could see that decision being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
I had Ricky winning the fight. He looked pretty bad, but the first round knockdown made the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
Good lord, WHAT A HORRIBLE DECISION!!! No wonder Ike doesn't like fighting here. CC to you for choosing the worst decision of the year.
:coolclick: for giving Cory his dues, yes he gassed at the end and ran like a girl, before crying like a girl at the decision but he definitely put enough into the early rounds to emerge a comfortable winner.
Karmazin just did nothing for 8 rounds and even when it was clear Spinks had little left he didn't to much more than stalk Spinks around the ring.
Cory easiliy deserved that decision imo.
Likewise Jeff Lacy, a close hard fought fight but he won wnough of the early rounds to get the decision. If it had been a draw or Tyspko had won I would have had little complaint but not even close to being a robbery.
Hatton against Collazo was a close fight, certainly the final round was big for Collazo and left the impression that he left the fight the victor but adding up the scores round by round and it was pretty close. I felt Collazo shaded it but I didn't sit down and score rbr so I wouldn't say it was a robbery.
For me the clearest robberies of the year were Ike Quartey somehow losing to Vernan Forrest and in a completely inexplicable decision Antony Bonsante losing a UD to Jesse Brinkley in a fight that I and I think everyone else who watched it would have given to Bonsante 5 rounds to 0.
Honourable, (or shameful) mentions go to Williams Skelton 1, Peter vs Toney, although as both Skelton and Toney get a chance to avenge its all ended ok
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by albsur2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Spinks, Lacy, and Peter all winning. Spinks and Lacy weren't even questionable IMO. I had Peter up by a round, but I could see that decision being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
I had Ricky winning the fight. He looked pretty bad, but the first round knockdown made the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
Good lord, WHAT A HORRIBLE DECISION!!! No wonder Ike doesn't like fighting here. CC to you for choosing the worst decision of the year.
:coolclick: for giving Cory his dues, yes he gassed at the end and ran like a girl, before crying like a girl at the decision but he definitely put enough into the early rounds to emerge a comfortable winner.
Karmazin just did nothing for 8 rounds and even when it was clear Spinks had little left he didn't to much more than stalk Spinks around the ring.
Cory easiliy deserved that decision imo.
Likewise Jeff Lacy, a close hard fought fight but he won wnough of the early rounds to get the decision. If it had been a draw or Tyspko had won I would have had little complaint but not even close to being a robbery.
Hatton against Collazo was a close fight, certainly the final round was big for Collazo and left the impression that he left the fight the victor but adding up the scores round by round and it was pretty close. I felt Collazo shaded it but I didn't sit down and score rbr so I wouldn't say it was a robbery.
For me the clearest robberies of the year were Ike Quartey somehow losing to Vernan Forrest and in a completely inexplicable decision Antony Bonsante losing a UD to Jesse Brinkley in a fight that I and I think everyone else who watched it would have given to Bonsante 5 rounds to 0.
Honourable, (or shameful) mentions go to Williams Skelton 1, Peter vs Toney, although as both Skelton and Toney get a chance to avenge its all ended ok
yea good call bilbo i mentioned that one while ago brinkley vs bosante 2 was horrible decision i scored it 4 rounds to 0 with one even i think he outlanded brinkley by triple it was disgraceful decision
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
:coolclick: back buddy, thanks
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Karma wont let me Ice Cold, I'll have to wait 24
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
Karma wont let me Ice Cold, I'll have to wait 24
same here mate 8)
