Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Riddck Bowe the time he threw a punch after the bell that lead to an all in after the bell ring brawl with his opponent being puched over the ropes.
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikersk
Gord bless ya .
I still think FV performence is one of the bravest ever the way he kept his skills together under that kinda pressure .
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Yeah and his temper. It's always a shame to see a fighter stoop to that just becase he "should" be winning.
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennf
Hatton was lucky not to be DQ'd againstTszyu!
Not really..Considering he had been hit with two low blows before he returned just the one..
I say toney - peter II
I would have dq'd peter..Those rabit punches were butal in the first few rounds
You mean that great left rip to Hatton's body in round six that Bernard Hopkins would have been proud of...
No i mean the two low blows one the round before and one immediately before the blow hatton returned..Which tszyu was called on by teh referee..
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
tyson should have been dq'd many times in his prime, i lost count how many times he went in with his head and more importently the number of times he would follow through with his elbow after throwing hooks ( mostly after the left hook ) he beat bruno with the head and elbow in there 2 fights after there first franks trainer said to richard steele who ref'd the fight, " you've given my man 2 warnings for holding but you've let tyson use everything but his feet " to which good old rich said " hey man i gotto live in this town ya get me "
classic
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
MOST OF TEDDY REID'S FIGHTS AND gOLATA AGAINST DOC NICHOLSON
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Mayweather when his uncle jumped in the ring.
I disagree strongly here. In my opinion, this was the perfect example of a time where the ref could have dq'd a fighter, but made the right call in NOT dq'ing him.
The whole purpose of disqualifying a fighter (or deducting points) is to penalize a fighter who commits a foul and gains an unfair advantage as a result of the foul.
Floyd Mayweather gained no advantage from his uncle entering the ring. The action and the time had already been stopped because of the intentional low blow.
Did Roger deserve to be ejected from the fight? Of course he did. Did he deserve a suspension like the one he got? Definitely.
But to DQ Floyd because Roger entered the ring would not have been a correct decision. If that happened, you'd be rewarding the guy (Judah) who started the whole sequence by blatantly hitting low, because he was getting his a** kicked and wasn't man enough to take his beating like a pro.
I realize you're obviously a big Floyd fan but you have to stop being so biased. The politics of boxing prevented justice in that case. A rule is a rule and as much as it wasn't Floyds fault, he should have been dq'ed for his corners actions.
Everything was against Zab that night from the ref not calling the knockdown to the non DQ. To add insult to injury, he becomes the first guy I've ever heard of that gets a year suspension for throwing a low blow. Even Golota didn't pay a price that steep. It's not like Zab was throwing illegal shots all night.
Zab got a raw deal and if you wanna believe the commentarys version then that's fine with me but just know you're wrong on this one. That is just a case of HBO protecting their investment. Period.
Is that you Sal?... ;D
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Mayweather when his uncle jumped in the ring.
I disagree strongly here. In my opinion, this was the perfect example of a time where the ref could have dq'd a fighter, but made the right call in NOT dq'ing him.
The whole purpose of disqualifying a fighter (or deducting points) is to penalize a fighter who commits a foul and gains an unfair advantage as a result of the foul.
Floyd Mayweather gained no advantage from his uncle entering the ring. The action and the time had already been stopped because of the intentional low blow.
Did Roger deserve to be ejected from the fight? Of course he did. Did he deserve a suspension like the one he got? Definitely.
But to DQ Floyd because Roger entered the ring would not have been a correct decision. If that happened, you'd be rewarding the guy (Judah) who started the whole sequence by blatantly hitting low, because he was getting his a** kicked and wasn't man enough to take his beating like a pro.
I realize you're obviously a big Floyd fan but you have to stop being so biased. The politics of boxing prevented justice in that case. A rule is a rule and as much as it wasn't Floyds fault, he should have been dq'ed for his corners actions.
Everything was against Zab that night from the ref not calling the knockdown to the non DQ. To add insult to injury, he becomes the first guy I've ever heard of that gets a year suspension for throwing a low blow. Even Golota didn't pay a price that steep. It's not like Zab was throwing illegal shots all night.
Zab got a raw deal and if you wanna believe the commentarys version then that's fine with me but just know you're wrong on this one. That is just a case of HBO protecting their investment. Period.
Your obviously a big Floyd hater ;) But correct me if I'm wrong, but the ref called time and the round was suspended, so Roger Didnt enter the ring during a round in progress...
Thats true in any sport,The coach and other players not involved cant enter the field of play while the game is in progress if they do fouls, penalties and ejections take place.. But during a time out the coach can Breakdance on top of his head at midfield and its irrelevant because TIME WAS CALLED!!!!!
That is absolutely ridiculous to insinuate Judah was getting the shaft, especially cause that sneaky little prick commited 2 fouls
Foul#1 BLATANT LOW BLOW
Foul#2 INTENTIONALLY HITTING IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD
C'mon man your hatred for Floyd is clouding your perceptive powers :-\
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Mayweather when his uncle jumped in the ring.
I disagree strongly here. In my opinion, this was the perfect example of a time where the ref could have dq'd a fighter, but made the right call in NOT dq'ing him.
The whole purpose of disqualifying a fighter (or deducting points) is to penalize a fighter who commits a foul and gains an unfair advantage as a result of the foul.
Floyd Mayweather gained no advantage from his uncle entering the ring. The action and the time had already been stopped because of the intentional low blow.
Did Roger deserve to be ejected from the fight? Of course he did. Did he deserve a suspension like the one he got? Definitely.
But to DQ Floyd because Roger entered the ring would not have been a correct decision. If that happened, you'd be rewarding the guy (Judah) who started the whole sequence by blatantly hitting low, because he was getting his a** kicked and wasn't man enough to take his beating like a pro.
I realize you're obviously a big Floyd fan but you have to stop being so biased. The politics of boxing prevented justice in that case. A rule is a rule and as much as it wasn't Floyds fault, he should have been dq'ed for his corners actions.
Everything was against Zab that night from the ref not calling the knockdown to the non DQ. To add insult to injury, he becomes the first guy I've ever heard of that gets a year suspension for throwing a low blow. Even Golota didn't pay a price that steep. It's not like Zab was throwing illegal shots all night.
Zab got a raw deal and if you wanna believe the commentarys version then that's fine with me but just know you're wrong on this one. That is just a case of HBO protecting their investment. Period.
Your obviously a big Floyd hater ;) But correct me if I'm wrong, but the ref called time and the round was suspended, so Roger Didnt enter the ring during a round in progress...
Thats true in any sport,The coach and other players not involved cant enter the field of play while the game is in progress if they do fouls, penalties and ejections take place.. But during a time out the coach can Breakdance on top of his head at midfield and its irrelevant because TIME WAS CALLED!!!!!
That is absolutely ridiculous to insinuate Judah was getting the shaft, especially cause that sneaky little prick commited 2 fouls
Foul#1 BLATANT LOW BLOW
Foul#2 INTENTIONALLY HITTING IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD
C'mon man your hatred for Floyd is clouding your perceptive powers :-\
i agree with jt why should mayweather get dq for what his uncle done ?? zab low blowed mayweather i dont see how mayweathers uncle jumping in ring should make mayweather get dq
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Judah .........that sneaky little prick
Although I agreed with your whole post, my CC to you was solely based on the above words.
;D
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Mayweather when his uncle jumped in the ring.
I disagree strongly here. In my opinion, this was the perfect example of a time where the ref could have dq'd a fighter, but made the right call in NOT dq'ing him.
The whole purpose of disqualifying a fighter (or deducting points) is to penalize a fighter who commits a foul and gains an unfair advantage as a result of the foul.
Floyd Mayweather gained no advantage from his uncle entering the ring. The action and the time had already been stopped because of the intentional low blow.
Did Roger deserve to be ejected from the fight? Of course he did. Did he deserve a suspension like the one he got? Definitely.
But to DQ Floyd because Roger entered the ring would not have been a correct decision. If that happened, you'd be rewarding the guy (Judah) who started the whole sequence by blatantly hitting low, because he was getting his a** kicked and wasn't man enough to take his beating like a pro.
I realize you're obviously a big Floyd fan but you have to stop being so biased. The politics of boxing prevented justice in that case. A rule is a rule and as much as it wasn't Floyds fault, he should have been dq'ed for his corners actions.
Everything was against Zab that night from the ref not calling the knockdown to the non DQ. To add insult to injury, he becomes the first guy I've ever heard of that gets a year suspension for throwing a low blow. Even Golota didn't pay a price that steep. It's not like Zab was throwing illegal shots all night.
Zab got a raw deal and if you wanna believe the commentarys version then that's fine with me but just know you're wrong on this one. That is just a case of HBO protecting their investment. Period.
Your obviously a big Floyd hater ;) But correct me if I'm wrong, but the ref called time and the round was suspended, so Roger Didnt enter the ring during a round in progress...
Thats true in any sport,The coach and other players not involved cant enter the field of play while the game is in progress if they do fouls, penalties and ejections take place.. But during a time out the coach can Breakdance on top of his head at midfield and its irrelevant because TIME WAS CALLED!!!!!
That is absolutely ridiculous to insinuate Judah was getting the shaft, especially cause that sneaky little prick commited 2 fouls
Foul#1 BLATANT LOW BLOW
Foul#2 INTENTIONALLY HITTING IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD
C'mon man your hatred for Floyd is clouding your perceptive powers :-\
i agree with jt why should mayweather get dq for what his uncle done ?? zab low blowed mayweather i dont see how mayweathers uncle jumping in ring should make mayweather get dq
Barrera got dq in first fight with junior jones because his corner man jumped in ring so why not Floyd for same thing
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Judah .........that sneaky little prick
Although I agreed with your whole post, my CC to you was solely based on the above words.
;D
:coolclick: #185 to you.... He does kinda take an appearance of a weazle or ferret... either way he is a little creepy douche bag ;D
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Judah .........that sneaky little prick
Although I agreed with your whole post, my CC to you was solely based on the above words.
;D
:coolclick: #185 to you.... He does kinda take an appearance of a weazle or ferret... either way he is a little creepy douche bag ;D
I saw him live for the first time, at the Cotto fight. Every time they showed him on the big screen, the crowd would boo the sh*t out of him.
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysonbruno
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Mayweather when his uncle jumped in the ring.
I disagree strongly here. In my opinion, this was the perfect example of a time where the ref could have dq'd a fighter, but made the right call in NOT dq'ing him.
The whole purpose of disqualifying a fighter (or deducting points) is to penalize a fighter who commits a foul and gains an unfair advantage as a result of the foul.
Floyd Mayweather gained no advantage from his uncle entering the ring. The action and the time had already been stopped because of the intentional low blow.
Did Roger deserve to be ejected from the fight? Of course he did. Did he deserve a suspension like the one he got? Definitely.
But to DQ Floyd because Roger entered the ring would not have been a correct decision. If that happened, you'd be rewarding the guy (Judah) who started the whole sequence by blatantly hitting low, because he was getting his a** kicked and wasn't man enough to take his beating like a pro.
I realize you're obviously a big Floyd fan but you have to stop being so biased. The politics of boxing prevented justice in that case. A rule is a rule and as much as it wasn't Floyds fault, he should have been dq'ed for his corners actions.
Everything was against Zab that night from the ref not calling the knockdown to the non DQ. To add insult to injury, he becomes the first guy I've ever heard of that gets a year suspension for throwing a low blow. Even Golota didn't pay a price that steep. It's not like Zab was throwing illegal shots all night.
Zab got a raw deal and if you wanna believe the commentarys version then that's fine with me but just know you're wrong on this one. That is just a case of HBO protecting their investment. Period.
Your obviously a big Floyd hater ;) But correct me if I'm wrong, but the ref called time and the round was suspended, so Roger Didnt enter the ring during a round in progress...
Thats true in any sport,The coach and other players not involved cant enter the field of play while the game is in progress if they do fouls, penalties and ejections take place.. But during a time out the coach can Breakdance on top of his head at midfield and its irrelevant because TIME WAS CALLED!!!!!
That is absolutely ridiculous to insinuate Judah was getting the shaft, especially cause that sneaky little prick commited 2 fouls
Foul#1 BLATANT LOW BLOW
Foul#2 INTENTIONALLY HITTING IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD
C'mon man your hatred for Floyd is clouding your perceptive powers :-\
i agree with jt why should mayweather get dq for what his uncle done ?? zab low blowed mayweather i dont see how mayweathers uncle jumping in ring should make mayweather get dq
Barrera got dq in first fight with junior jones because his corner man jumped in ring so why not Floyd for same thing
because barrera was down twice in that round if i remember right he was on his way to getting koed
difference is mayweather was winning fight comfortably after that an judah fouled him theres difference mate
Re: fighters who should of been dq that wernt
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysonbruno
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bx730NY
Mayweather when his uncle jumped in the ring.
I disagree strongly here. In my opinion, this was the perfect example of a time where the ref could have dq'd a fighter, but made the right call in NOT dq'ing him.
The whole purpose of disqualifying a fighter (or deducting points) is to penalize a fighter who commits a foul and gains an unfair advantage as a result of the foul.
Floyd Mayweather gained no advantage from his uncle entering the ring. The action and the time had already been stopped because of the intentional low blow.
Did Roger deserve to be ejected from the fight? Of course he did. Did he deserve a suspension like the one he got? Definitely.
But to DQ Floyd because Roger entered the ring would not have been a correct decision. If that happened, you'd be rewarding the guy (Judah) who started the whole sequence by blatantly hitting low, because he was getting his a** kicked and wasn't man enough to take his beating like a pro.
I realize you're obviously a big Floyd fan but you have to stop being so biased. The politics of boxing prevented justice in that case. A rule is a rule and as much as it wasn't Floyds fault, he should have been dq'ed for his corners actions.
Everything was against Zab that night from the ref not calling the knockdown to the non DQ. To add insult to injury, he becomes the first guy I've ever heard of that gets a year suspension for throwing a low blow. Even Golota didn't pay a price that steep. It's not like Zab was throwing illegal shots all night.
Zab got a raw deal and if you wanna believe the commentarys version then that's fine with me but just know you're wrong on this one. That is just a case of HBO protecting their investment. Period.
Your obviously a big Floyd hater ;) But correct me if I'm wrong, but the ref called time and the round was suspended, so Roger Didnt enter the ring during a round in progress...
Thats true in any sport,The coach and other players not involved cant enter the field of play while the game is in progress if they do fouls, penalties and ejections take place.. But during a time out the coach can Breakdance on top of his head at midfield and its irrelevant because TIME WAS CALLED!!!!!
That is absolutely ridiculous to insinuate Judah was getting the shaft, especially cause that sneaky little prick commited 2 fouls
Foul#1 BLATANT LOW BLOW
Foul#2 INTENTIONALLY HITTING IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD
C'mon man your hatred for Floyd is clouding your perceptive powers :-\
i agree with jt why should mayweather get dq for what his uncle done ?? zab low blowed mayweather i dont see how mayweathers uncle jumping in ring should make mayweather get dq
Barrera got dq in first fight with junior jones because his corner man jumped in ring so why not Floyd for same thing
because barrera was down twice in that round if i remember right he was on his way to getting koed
difference is mayweather was winning fight comfortably after that an judah fouled him theres difference mate
Gunna get knocked out or not trainer should'nt enter ring should he Peter Mcneeley got dq'd against Tyson for same thing
