Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
This one is too close to call really . Both big hitters , both have been down .
Could go either way in a shootout but it would probably go Nas' way cuz he got up when he was floored but Pacs been knocked out a couple times.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
i don't agree but hahaha floyd fan ;D
:coolclick:
but seriously pac would murder both of them all week long twice on sunday right after church ;D
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them  ;D
i don't agree but hahaha floyd fan ;D
:coolclick:
but seriously pac would murder both of them all week long twice on sunday right after church ;D
Pretty Original there Bub 
:coolclick:# 64 my delusional Pac loving friend
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
i don't agree but hahaha floyd fan ;D
:coolclick:
but seriously pac would murder both of them all week long twice on sunday right after church ;D
Pretty Original there Bub
:coolclick:# 64 my delusional Pac loving friend
yea bRo, lets admit it we're all a bit bias ;D
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
but seriously hamed ain't got shyt against pac or floyd ;)
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
I have no idea how that would turn out if it was prime Vs. prime. All I know is it would be one exciting fight! Thats a dream matchup, good one. CC
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Just because Naz lost to Barrera people are fast to right him off
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Just because Naz lost to Barrera people are fast to right him off
people didnt have to write him off.. he wrote himself off.. where is he now???????????
ohh i forgot.... he landed a one punch kO on his maclaren a couple of months back.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Barrera broke his spirit :'(
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
"I have to say that I think Pac would win. If Kevin Kelley could brawl with NAZ and put him on his butt, then imagine what would happen to him if he fought PAC."
"Pac has fought several elite featherweights and come out of it with a very respectable resume. NAZ fought one elite featherweight, got beaten, and retired."
"I think Pac should be heavily favored"
I agree!
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
kelley's knockdowns were balance shots
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
"NAZ fought one elite featherweight, got beaten, and retired"
Haha! That is so true.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
"NAZ fought one elite featherweight, got beaten, and retired"
Haha! That is so true.
Trinidad fought one elite Middleweight who boxed brilliantly and retired
So true.
But I would still pick Trinidad against anyone who comes and tries to brawl with him!
Pac would fight Hamed's fight with his own style.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdane
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
2 very exciting offensive fighters, that are wide open and have defense pretty low on their priority list in the ring... Lets just say this isin't goint to the judges
Hard to say... Naz had devestating power and cat like reflexes, Pac is reminescent of the Tazmanian Devil just a nonstop pressure punching whirlwind..... definetly would be a FOTY candidate
no its really not hard to say..
against who did naz have catlike reflexes, against the one and only elite guy he fought, or the huys brought in, to make him look good..??we all know the answer to that one..
the difference is, that while naz looked powerfull and quick against b-level opponents, pac has done it against simply the best..
YES HAMED POWER DIDNT DENT MAB , PAC IS FASTER WORKS HARDER AND HAS PROVEN POWER AGAINEST THE BEST , BYEBYE PAUPER NASEM HAMED. NO CONTEST PAC INSIDE 3
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
One elite featherweight for a start Barrera was coming up from Superbantam and what about Boom Boom Johnson who was featherweight number 1 when Naz fought him ko round 8 Johnson was never the same again after that beating. Kevin Kelley only one defeat, Manuel Medina former world champ knocked down 3 times packs in can't take anymore yet went on to win 2 more world titles and beat Scott Harrison.Paul Ingle a good feather weight ko 11 a solid pressure fighter who went on and won IBF title against Medina and defended against and stopped Junior Jones ,Cesar Soto was a scrappy fight but he was WBC champ Naz won UD12.Wayne McCullough UD12 and Naz schooled him better than Morales,Bungu ko4 all these guys ive mentioned so far were all top 10 fighters so how was Barrera his first elite
