Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
wlad fought mercer too... and smoked his a$$...
lewis got f***ing destroyed against rachman... peter, sanders, brewster ALL hit harder than rachman...
wlad took good shots from brock and walked through them..
peter is one of the hardest hitters ever and WLAD TOOK EVERYTHING PETER HAS and beat his a$$ 9 out of 12 rounds.... after taking them shots... THAT WAS A WAR AND PETER HITS EASILY AS HARD AS VITALI AND MERCER...
anyone would get wobbled or floored by a flush sanders, peter, brewster shot...those 3 have f***ing crushed several champs...
it has more to do with wlad's defence than chin which wlad has dramtically improved his defence..
h*ll wlads dramatically improved his offence too... with the new lead straight right, wlad is DANGEROUS
Wlad fought 40 year old Mercer lets not be silly now and i suppose DaVarryl Williamson is crushing hitter aswell ?? because he put Wlad on the deck aswell name me one fight where Wlad has took flush shot and hasn't been wobbled stopped or knocked down.
brock
Brock isn't that much of a power puncher and i don't remember him hitting Wlad flush either.
then rewatch the fight... or is wlad just that good that no one has ever hit him flush accept for peter sanders and brewster
brock had one of the ko's of the year 2006 has good not great power
Maybe i do haven't seen it in ages but i don't remember any hard flush punches landing on Wlad at all and you just said Brock did land flush punches and now you have just changed it by saying is Wlad that good no one else as hit him except Sanders ect i don't get that unless i read it wrong truth is Wlad is best of very bad bunch of hws infact the worst hw era of all time.
... i was sacasticly saying that is wlad that good he was never hit by anyone but 3 guys.... OF COURSE HE HAS BEEN HIT HARD BY ALMOST EVERY GUY HE HAS FACED HE IS A HW....
and the current era is the worst HW's of all time... that staement alone should show how much you know about HW's....
i know its a popular myth but... if you think the top ten to 15 in the HW divsion today went head to head with those of the 1900' 30's 50's 60's 80's and90's you need to study up a little more....
and i am talking about the top 10 - 15 HW's not the top two...
So your questioning my knowledge on hws ?? don't even go there you know people who argue weak arguements always question other peoples knowledge i've noticed that since i've been here i have not been rude to you so why do you have to insult me ?? because that is insulting of course hws today would beat hws of early 1900s only because they wouldn't even be hws by today standards .....
Doesn't mean level of competition in early 1900s is worse or 50s or 40s ect and yes Wlads era is weakest hw era of all time and hws in 90s Bowe Lewis Holyfield Ruddock George Foreman would make mince meat of all hws today.
didnt mean to insult sorry bro... it was a careless comment
but back to the points you said HW's OF ALL TIME not just since what the 60's the HW's before the 60's was the biggest baddest dudes their was.. and some of them WERE BIG ...
head to head which is how i rate era's the top 10-15 currently would smash the 50's and below how else could you compare them they are in the same division...
the 90's TOP 10 -15 is no better than today's
neither was the top 10-15 the 80's
if todays HW's are better THAN ANY DECADE that means your wrong...
beings that you said the worst of all time.. then change it to least competitive...
our top 10-15 today are atleast avg. compared to ALL TIME
oh and wlad, vitali, and peter would have battled the 90's foreman40
+, bowe and holyfield, and ruddick.. there would be mence meat on both sides....
and the depth 10-15 is much better now than in the 90's
h#ll vitali did battle lewis,