Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG H
The thing about opposition is.........who did B-HOP or RJJ really fight that was in their prime?
You can pick holes in any record - but admitedly Warren has not always done a grat job for him (apart from Lacy & Kessler fights)
Jones is one thing. Jones is a little above Calzaghe in terms of competition past '94 through '03 imo. A great fighter, who got off to a tremendously fast start by beating Hopkins and Toney, then pretty much flatlining in the scope of big fights.
Hopkins has had big fights time in and time out and consistently throughout his career. Jones and Calzaghe didn't.
Hopkins fought RJJ when he was a challenger, until Trinadad he didnt really fight any exceptional fighters so he was 36 years old, he fought 7 past World Champs and fought two unifications that includes Trinadad and Dela Hoya, Calzaghe when and if he beats Kessler has fought 6 past World Champs and 2 unifications aswell, its just the fact the 168 division hasnt been blessed with the biggest names in boxing.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
As for my opinion of him. Well I hate him. I'm a Lacy fan and he (or his camp, whatever, but I'm going to just blame that on Calzaghe) annoyed me to no end in the dealings of the Lacy fight. Agreeing, fighting a meaningless tune up and breaking his hand, rescheduling and then still insisting upon Lacy coming to England when Joe needed Jeff a lot more then Jeff needed Joe at that point. And then of course he ruined about my whole month when they did get it on....
But he's a fighter, who at his best, is definitely among the finest in the world. I don't need to say much, but his aggression, hand speed, balance and fire are pretty much unparalleled right now in his division.
He may be a bit brash, and an ass sometimes but there is no denying that on his night, he is one of the truly great boxers fighting right now.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
As for my opinion of him. Well I hate him. I'm a Lacy fan and he (or his camp, whatever, but I'm going to just blame that on Calzaghe) annoyed me to no end in the dealings of the Lacy fight. Agreeing, fighting a meaningless tune up and breaking his hand, rescheduling and then still insisting upon Lacy coming to England when Joe needed Jeff a lot more then Jeff needed Joe at that point. And then of course he ruined about my whole month when they did get it on....
But he's a fighter, who at his best, is definitely among the finest in the world. I don't need to say much, but his aggression, hand speed, balance and fire are pretty much unparalleled right now in his division.
He may be a bit brash, and an a** sometimes but there is no denying that on his night, he is one of the truly great boxers fighting right now.
cc mate, nice to see a guy who can respect a good boxer even if your notthe biggest fan.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
its just the fact the 168 division hasnt been blessed with the biggest names in boxing.
And 160 during the Hopkins era was? He still managed big and meaningful fights. I don't care if he was a challenger, or if De La Hoya and Trinidad were welterweights before. They were big fights, and he won a good chunk of them. He had his name in the news, even if it meant searching a bit. And it's not like they weren't fights that nobody wanted to see and were blatant mismatches, they were good matchups that everyone was excited about.
Not to mention fights that weren't high profile against good boxers like Glen Johnson and Simon Brown.
You may love Calzaghe, that's fine, I love Nicolinno Locche who never left his country in his prime to score big fights. But he hasn't got the fights he needs for whatever reason. You can say that Hopkins didn't make the fight happen, but Hopkins had big bouts under his belt while Joe outside of the English spectrum didn't.
He got it done versus Lacy, it was an outstanding performance that he deserves a ton of credit for but past that he hasn't really fought anyone. Robin Reid was a good fighter. So was Brewer but past that there isn't much depth.
Doesn't take anything away from him as a fighter, and you really can't blame all Joe. Plus fighting in front of packed houses all the time, he must feel like he does have those big fights. And if he can get Kessler and someone else, then a lot of those criticisms disappear.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
its just the fact the 168 division hasnt been blessed with the biggest names in boxing.
And 160 during the Hopkins era was? He still managed big and meaningful fights. I don't care if he was a challenger, or if De La Hoya and Trinidad were welterweights before. They were big fights, and he won a good chunk of them. He had his name in the news, even if it meant searching a bit. And it's not like they weren't fights that nobody wanted to see and were blatant mismatches, they were good matchups that everyone was excited about.
Not to mention fights that weren't high profile against good boxers like Glen Johnson and Simon Brown.
You may love Calzaghe, that's fine, I love Nicolinno Locche who never left his country in his prime to score big fights. But he hasn't got the fights he needs for whatever reason. You can say that Hopkins didn't make the fight happen, but Hopkins had big bouts under his belt while Joe outside of the English spectrum didn't.
He got it done versus Lacy, it was an outstanding performance that he deserves a ton of credit for but past that he hasn't really fought anyone. Robin Reid was a good fighter. So was Brewer but past that there isn't much depth.
Doesn't take anything away from him as a fighter, and you really can't blame all Joe. Plus fighting in front of packed houses all the time, he must feel like he does have those big fights. And if he can get Kessler and someone else, then a lot of those criticisms disappear.
Ok you make some good points, but firstly Calzaghe hasn't always been the Home boy against Reid he was the away fighter, he also has beaton a good fighter in Woodhall who was a WBC fighter and Byron Mitchell who also was a World Champion, the same Glen Johnson was not the same fighter he has been in the last five years, the same Glen johnson was beaton by Omar Sheika who in his next fight was battered in 5 by Calzaghe, Hopkins Trinadad i agree was a great fight and Hopkins was in there as a big dog and props to him but up unitl then his resume is not disimilar to Calzaghes like i said, Joe is now 35 similar age to Bernard was and is now getting the recognition and big fights which he has craved his whole career. I dont love Calzaghe i think he is an awesome fighter.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Fair play, I actually meant to say Mitchell instead of Brewer. Not even sure he fought Brewer. I think so though.
And I get what you mean about both getting fights later on in their careers, understand that completely though I still think Hopkins had the better record overall even before Trinidad. But that's down to opinion really, and I meant nothing by saying you love Calzaghe btw, I say I love fighters all the time.
CC 239
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
JC is a superbly skilled fighter who just needs 2 or 3 more big wins to establish himself as a legend. His skills are superb and clear for all to see.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
:) My opinion of Calzaghi,is that we have not seen him at his best, cos he aint fought anyone who was good enough, to put pressure on him , to bring out the survival instinct that all great fighters posses, thats not Joes fault, he can only beat the guys in his time, so he will allways be, a only IF fighter ;)
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Superheavyhun, believe me that mine is one of the most non biased opinions you can find, I have no love affair with fighters whether they are from Britain or if they are all american stars... Joe Calzaghe is a great undefeated P4P fighter, nobody can say otherwise cause the guy has the boxing skills to make a dangerous puncher like Lacy look silly, he has the loose muscled, fluid punching power to knock down one sturdy chin in Eubanks and in the first punch he throws, he has the heart to comeback from a knockdown and still take Mitchell in the same 2 round, he has the handspeed and the footwork to leave Brewer, Manfredo, Veit clueless... Why he is not an all time P 4 P great? That's easy to answer... Cause he has Frank Warren to keep him away from the fights which would make him shine brighter, Bernard Hopkins, Winky Wright, Jermain Taylor... At least, he's gonna fight Kessler and obviously beat him but this Cardiff Welsh backyard thang still sucks BIG TIME!!!
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by WelshDevilRob
Quote:
Originally Posted by nonito (formerly eagle)
Where is the section:
World Clas Fighter who has ducked the best of his era (til now) and afraid to travel?
Ducked?
Where's the section for stupid people like you shouldn't be allowed to vote? Why am I asking you? your to F****** thick. ::**
Hopkins and Jones got offered the money and pussied out! Even a bum like Manfredo was braver than them.
Hopkins said Yes then saw the tapes and wanted double the money. Another Yankee Pussy.
You are not looking at this from a welsh point of view then lol ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
If Joe wanted Jones or Hopkins as he is a lesser name , he should have gone to them not made excuses.
That doesnt make sense? Go over fight in America for probably a tenth of what he would of got to fight Hopkins in Britain and the same with Hopkins getting paid alot less than what he would if he went to Britain, why do you think the Calzaghe fight with Kessler is in Wales and not Denmark or USA? Because the money for everyone concerned is in Wales, in the instance with Hopkins it doesnt matter who the lesser name is, its about business why fight in one place when both of you can earn so much more in another? Im not sure if any fighter in the whole history of boxing has fought someone at a venue where they get paid little in comparison to if they fought at another venue? Hopkins was getting his biggest payday at that stage in his carear, but why does no one dis respect him for this? I dont get it, imagine it was Joe who turned down his biggest payday to go to the States F*** me this forum would probably blow up with the amount of insults he would be getting thrown his way.
The point i was making is , if you cant get the career difining fights in your home town you sometimes have to go elsewere , if Joe wanted those big names then with a bit of sacrafice could have got them , thats my point , oviously in an ideal world you get as much money as you can.
But if u want to be regarded as a GREAT then you have to fight the big names which Joe has not .
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
I love it...totally ridiculous.
There is only one viable option.
Joe is P4P the best in his division. Period. He's a true champ & bum does not even apply.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
There's two schools of thought when it comes to Joe Calzaghe. The fans point to his undefeated record, and his impressive win over Jeff Lacy. His detractors point to his lack of quality opposition, and his frustrating inability to stay busy and face some of the logical opposition out there.
IMO, the ball is squarely on Joe's court. He can either:
a. Concentrate on retiring with an undefeated record, and leave everything in the hands of his promoter, the ever unpopular Warren, or.......
b. He can demand that his promoter get him the fights that are going to raise his stock among ALL boxing fans, not just his die-hard fans. And if Warren isn't up to the task, fire his a$$.
Let's face it, boxing's all about perception. Until Calzaghe faces the Kesslers, the Pavliks, the Taylors..... even if he has to travel to the U.S. to do it, his image in the eyes of some boxing fans (myself included) is going to be well short of p4p list considerations.
IMHO, of course.
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
There's two schools of thought when it comes to Joe Calzaghe. The fans point to his undefeated record, and his impressive win over Jeff Lacy. His detractors point to his lack of quality opposition, and his frustrating inability to stay busy and face some of the logical opposition out there.
IMO, the ball is squarely on Joe's court. He can either:
a. Concentrate on retiring with an undefeated record, and leave everything in the hands of his promoter, the ever unpopular Warren, or.......
b. He can demand that his promoter get him the fights that are going to raise his stock among ALL boxing fans, not just his die-hard fans. And if Warren isn't up to the task, fire his a$$.
Let's face it, boxing's all about perception. Until Calzaghe faces the Kesslers, the Pavliks, the Taylors..... even if he has to travel to the U.S. to do it, his image in the eyes of some boxing fans (myself included) is going to be well short of p4p list considerations.
IMHO, of course.
CC,good post. You make your points well. Does he earn your respect for fighting Kessler?
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG H
The thing about opposition is.........who did B-HOP or RJJ really fight that was in their prime?
You can pick holes in any record - but admitedly Warren has not always done a grat job for him (apart from Lacy & Kessler fights)
BIG H can i tell you something now not alot of fighters beat great fighters in there prime there isn't that many that have but Jones beat Toney in his prime and he also beat Hopkins and Hill all 3 of those guys will probably be in hall of fame ok so maybe they wern't quite in there prime but there still great wins and he also beat other good fighters like.
Montel Griffin
Eric Harding
Clinton Woods
Reggie Johnson
Vinny Pazienza
Julio Cesar Gonzalez
James Toney
Bernard Hopkins
Virgil Hill
Compare that to Calzaghes best wins
Byron Mitchell
Charles Brewer
Richie Woodhall
Mario Veit
Omar Sheika
Robin Reid
Chris Eubank Weight drained and past it
Re: What is your opinion of Joe Calzaghe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
There's two schools of thought when it comes to Joe Calzaghe. The fans point to his undefeated record, and his impressive win over Jeff Lacy. His detractors point to his lack of quality opposition, and his frustrating inability to stay busy and face some of the logical opposition out there.
IMO, the ball is squarely on Joe's court. He can either:
a. Concentrate on retiring with an undefeated record, and leave everything in the hands of his promoter, the ever unpopular Warren, or.......
b. He can demand that his promoter get him the fights that are going to raise his stock among ALL boxing fans, not just his die-hard fans. And if Warren isn't up to the task, fire his a$$.
Let's face it, boxing's all about perception. Until Calzaghe faces the Kesslers, the Pavliks, the Taylors..... even if he has to travel to the U.S. to do it, his image in the eyes of some boxing fans (myself included) is going to be well short of p4p list considerations.
IMHO, of course.
CC,good post. You make your points well. Does he earn your respect for fighting Kessler?
Thanks bro... CC back.
It's not that I don't respect Calzaghe now. After all, he IS undefeated... and he DID beat Lacy convincingly. And people may dis Lacy now. But before the Calzaghe fight, there were a lot of Lacy believers who have since leaped off the bandwagon.
But Calzaghe needs to do more, IMO, to join the ranks of the warriors who have taken on good fighter after good fighter, without the excuse of promoters or venues to get in the way.
But yeah, if Calzaghe fights Kessler (sooner, rather than later) and beats him convincingly, his stock goes up in my book. Maybe still not top five p4p, but improving.