Re: Erik's standing in his era
ok thanks. the september issue features the pacquaio-barrera fight.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by chamiley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
chamiley go watch pacs fight vs. solis and larios even the third moralse fight. then come back and say if pac can't keep his distant and box and dodge punches. when I get the time I will send u highlights of pac dodging punches nd anticipating punches coming. he even does an ali shuffle after making eric mix about three in a row.
9 out of 10 proves your lack of knowledge buddy thanks for doing me the favor of not having to expose you.you did it for me ;)
I watched all those fights, maybe you need to watch them again. solis fight ended the way how pacquio fights are with manny hunting his opponents down with relentless aggression, there was no sweet science there and the 3rd fight with morales was a result of pac being the busier fighter with his activity level being something which morales didn't want to respond to. you seem to worship manny so much you overlook the verity of how great erik was in his prime.
Pac TKOed Solis. Who's complaining? I'm not. Another exciting fight from Pac.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by chamiley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
chamiley go watch pacs fight vs. solis and larios even the third moralse fight. then come back and say if pac can't keep his distant and box and dodge punches. when I get the time I will send u highlights of pac dodging punches nd anticipating punches coming. he even does an ali shuffle after making eric mix about three in a row.
9 out of 10 proves your lack of knowledge buddy thanks for doing me the favor of not having to expose you.you did it for me ;)
I watched all those fights, maybe you need to watch them again.
solis fight ended the way how pacquio fights are with manny hunting his opponents down with relentless aggression, there was no sweet science there and
the 3rd fight with morales was a result of pac being the busier fighter with his activity level being something which morales didn't want to respond to. you seem to worship manny so much you overlook the verity of how great erik was in his prime.
yea...no one wants to see that happen in a boxing match let alone be a great asset to have as a fighter...(notice the sarcasm)
Re: Erik's standing in his era
dang I knew I should of grab that mag at the stands when I was in a rush a few days ago. Now I'm sure there sold out by now. its hard finding ring magazines here.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
barnes and noble has the magazine on their shelves already. just picked one up during my lunch break
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
I'm not over looking eric. you need to see inbetween fight results. just because pac finishes big and is explosive does not mean he does not at times settle to box a bit. no you did not watch those fights closely, you just paid attention to the aggressive pac because of his excitement but notice all his ability. you can't say he can't settle down and box, its not like his all out every second. your lost kid, you made this thread suppose to be talking about where to rank eric but you keep it going with pac and with the wrong guy to debate with. your just an eric fan trying to gain some ground back since pac ended him. its ok I'm an eric fan too but theres a better fighter now, that's pac. you can even ask your boy eric he`ll tell you all about losing to pac. its only natural to try to bring up prime vs prime, your a fanatic ofcourse that's the only way you can feel better after seeing your boy get pummel in three rounds.
anyways get it back to where to rank eric, quit with the prime vs prime because from the get go saying eric wins 9 out 10 proves how useless it is to debate with a fellow with little logiv as that kind of statement. I'm tired of schooling you son, do your self a favor and bring the thread back to its o.g topic.
you didn't school noone, your argument is based on the erik of today & manny of today and with that you have displayed how green you are when it comes to boxing. do yourself a favor and watch all of erik's fights.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Suffice it to say that Erik will be inducted in the Boxing Hall of fame in the future.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
wow that's your reply....watch erics whole career again? answer me this what year or years do you consider erics best? eric to me is a future hall of fame. answer me another answer...do you think pac is a future hall of fame? after you answer my question ask your self is pac and eric really comparable? even though they did have a great trilogy. it was of two great diclining and improving fighters. would logic lead you to believe 9 out of 10 a prime 122 or 126 beats a prime 130 in addition a fighter against a more devestating puncher?
so 9 out of 10 huh? its ok son, delusional is one of many fanatic symtoms. maybe its you that needs to watch eric and pacs career again before making statements like that.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
wow that's your reply....watch erics whole career again? answer me this what year or years do you consider erics best? eric to me is a future hall of fame. answer me another answer...do you think pac is a future hall of fame? after you answer my question ask your self is pac and eric really comparable? even though they did have a great trilogy. it was of two great diclining and improving fighters. would logic lead you to believe 9 out of 10 a prime 122 or 126 beats a prime 130 in addition a fighter against a more devestating puncher?
so 9 out of 10 huh? its ok son, delusional is one of many fanatic symtoms. maybe its you that needs to watch eric and pacs career again before making statements like that.
;D
Re: Erik's standing in his era
we're slowly becoming a team here Pacstraight...hehehe. I'll try to do the moderation when things are becoming hotter with you and the other "defenders" (not fanatics) of their boxers.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
we're slowly becoming a team here Pacstraight...hehehe. I'll try to do the moderation when things are becoming hotter with you and the other "defenders" (not fanatics) of their boxers.
I'm cool with that.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
wow that's your reply....watch erics whole career again? answer me this what year or years do you consider erics best? eric to me is a future hall of fame. answer me another answer...do you think pac is a future hall of fame? after you answer my question ask your self is pac and eric really comparable? even though they did have a great trilogy. it was of two great diclining and improving fighters. would logic lead you to believe 9 out of 10 a prime 122 or 126 beats a prime 130 in addition a fighter against a more devestating puncher?
so 9 out of 10 huh? its ok son, delusional is one of many fanatic symtoms. maybe its you that needs to watch eric and pacs career again before making statements like that.
"Son"? ok DAD first of all whatever I have said I have backed up with why I believe what I believe. all you have done is labelled me for my opinions, and calling me a fanatic or delusional doesn't give rise to your argument.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
we're slowly becoming a team here Pacstraight...hehehe. I'll try to do the moderation when things are becoming hotter with you and the other "defenders" (not fanatics) of their boxers.
I'm cool with that.
cc#81. Have a real cc from me then.hehehe.
Re: Erik's standing in his era
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
we're slowly becoming a team here Pacstraight...hehehe. I'll try to do the moderation when things are becoming hotter with you and the other "defenders" (not fanatics) of their boxers.
I'm cool with that.
cc#81. Have a real cc from me then.hehehe.
Cc back +46 :lol:
