REMATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Quote:

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Quote:

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

For what controversy it may cause il risk saying that i feel the knockout was caused largely by fatigue on Taylors part.

I thought it was from a right hand that almost took his head off and the left uppercut that rocked his head back followed by crushing left hook ;)

Taylor was getting knocked out as long as he moved awary, around, wherever, just as long as he didn hang around and get popped.
I felt he tired awfully in the 7th, got tagged by pretty much everyting Pavlik threw and got ko'd bad.

It was from accumulation of punches not from Taylor being tired.

Would the punches have accumulated had Taylor kept moving and not eaten Pavliks jab all round 7?

He was going to get caught with the jab regardless he couldn't stop it Pavlik has longer reach and when Taylor throws his jab he isn't able to move back without getting countered because of the couple of extra inches in Pavlik's jab Taylor thinks he is safe when moving back after throwing the jab but its the couple of extra inches in reach that Pavlik has over Taylor that will always give Taylor problems and Taylor was eating alot of hard punches and his body just couldn't take it no more Taylor done alot better that i thought he could do so props to Taylor.

Nah i wouldnt agree, iv always been taught that when fighting a taller boxer with a jab, when moving back u never move straight back, move diagonally, rotate, whatever but not straight back. Taylor applied this theory the first three-four rounds and wasn't caught (pavlik still scored well but not as heavily,) when in the seventh JT began to appear tired he dropped the plan, started to move back slowly and then he got caught.