Dariusz Michalczewski Fighting In 2008 ??

Yea but it like when you talk about Roy facing Hagler a middleweight and Roy best win was Hopkins and did you see the fight not like either was primed and so you base his wins off higher weights. I do the same thing with Moorer because he did pretty well as a Heavyweight and was a Undisputed champion and alose was the IBF belt holder along the way as well and his opponents at LH were not the best but he blasted through them. I do not think Roy has the power to bother him he may have been taken out by Tua and Foreman and a few other but he held his own with 230 pluse hard hitters. And i think Moore at the LH had the power to Knock Roy out if he connected so that why i pick Moorer i think he would knock Roy out of there late rounds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Yea but it like when you talk about Roy facing Hagler a middleweight and Roy best win was Hopkins and did you see the fight not like either was primed and so you base his wins off higher weights. I do the same thing with Moorer because he did pretty well as a Heavyweight and was a Undisputed champion and alose was the IBF belt holder along the way as well and his opponents at LH were not the best but he blasted through them. I do not think Roy has the power to bother him he may have been taken out by Tua and Foreman and a few other but he held his own with 230 pluse hard hitters. And i think Moore at the LH had the power to Knock Roy out if he connected so that why i pick Moorer i think he would knock Roy out of there late rounds.

---

Yea but it like when you talk about Roy facing Hagler a middleweight and Roy best win was Hopkins and did you see the fight not like either was primed

So what ?? Hopkins was still very good fighter he was more offensive minded back then and Jones is the only man who ever beat Hopkins by lopsided decision that is impressive.

I do the same thing with Moorer because he did pretty well as a Heavyweight and was a Undisputed champion and alose was the IBF belt holder along the way as well and his opponents at LH were not the best but he blasted through them.

So you haven't seen Moorer as Lightheavyweight yet you say he can beat prime Roy Jones just because he blasted through bums ?? umm ok and Moorer was rocked badly by limited fighters like Alex Stewart and almost stopped by journeyman Bert Cooper and was dropped twice Moorer always had suspect chin.

Thats all im saying on it im not turning this thread into strictly about Roy Jones.

Both were known for being big hitter and with more power then Roy so whats your point how would Roy bother Moorer. And 116-112 is not that lopsided of a decision and ok here something better for you at a catch weight i believe Moore would beat Roy you fell better about that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

And really and truthfully except for Virgil Hill and Montel Griffin alot of Dariusz's opposition was mediocre.

---

The same could be said of RJJ(at least as a light heavyweight)...

Mike McCallum
Virgil Hill
Eric Harding
Montell Griffin
Reggie Johnson
Antonio Tarver
Richard Hall
Julio Cesar Gonzalez
Clinton Woods

Compare Dariusz's Lightheavyweight record.

Richard Hall
Montell Griffin
Virgil Hill
Graciano Rocchigiani

And Jones still beats Dariusz in best wins at Lightheavyweight and Dariusz spent his whole career at Lightheavyweight and if you want me to compare there whole career of best wins there's no contest.

Mike McCallum who started at LM was a old ass man when Roy beat him, Eric Harding never held a real title and did nothing before or after Roy and then there was Gonzalez who best win was against a past it Griffen and past it Dariusz so what so great about him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Mike McCallum who started at LM was a old a** man when Roy beat him, Eric Harding never held a real title and did nothing before or after Roy and then there was Gonzalez who best win was against a past it Griffen and past it Dariusz so what so great about him.

---

Like i've already told you about 20 times McCallum won Lightheavyweight world title so he was still good and he gave Fabrice Tiozzo a good arguement the same Fabrice Tiozzo who destroyed Dariusz.

Harding beat Antonio Tarver.

Gonzalez beat Dariusz when he was 48-0 so that makes Jones victory over him look even more good because he dominated Gonzalez and dropped him twice.

Just face it your Roy Jones hater no matter what you try and do Jones beat better quality opposition than Dariusz.

Ok Roy jones Jr nut hugger why dont you stop glorifying a 40 has been and a guy that never even held a title.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Ok Roy jones Jr nut hugger why dont you stop glorifying a 40 has been and a guy that never even held a title.

---

Did you read what i said or shall i put in bold for you ??

Like i've already told you about 20 times McCallum won Lightheavyweight world title so he was still good and he gave Fabrice Tiozzo a good arguement the same Fabrice Tiozzo who destroyed Dariusz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Ok Roy jones Jr nut hugger why dont you stop glorifying a 40 has been and a guy that never even held a title.

---

So just because Harding never won a title doesn't make him good ?? Harding beat Tarver in IBF Light Heavyweight Title Eliminator for Jones title so he was worthy of the shot.

Are you talking about the 37 year old past Dariusz so when roy gets destroyed he is past it but if a even older Dariusz does it does not matter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Are you talking about the 37 year old past Dariusz so when roy gets destroyed he is past it but if a even older Dariusz does it does not matter.

---

Gonzalez was huge underdog against Dariusz was 48-0 and no expected Gonzalez to win so yes that was very good victory for Gonzalez and that makes Jones victory over Gonzalez even better.

Yet again a past it at 35 and Roy faced him when Roy was just turned 32 and still was in prime how was that a better win.

Lets just take a look on how Jones did when he was 35 not so good if you ask me.