Printable View
what are you talking about? I am right here. And your right, the alphabet gangs are corrupt.Quote:
Originally Posted by boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance UppercutHey antimoron, I think he was using something that us morons like to call sarcasm. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by antimoron
Lance I miss you. Every thread is ohw the alpha belts are corrupt. :)
"He beat the guy that was the champ, doesn't matter who he did or didn't face in the interim. You are never going to have a situation where everyone agrees. And to say that a champion has to face all contenders is absolutely ridiculous. There will always be a new contender on the rise and only so many times one can fight in a year. Who in your lifetime was a "World Champion"? Give me an example."
Yea, your right, maybe not every contender, but your statement just reinforces my point! "Read it!"
Linage is often broken: Example: List of current world boxing champions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia You can't continue the line without measuring the contenders. When you look at this list you will see that of the 17 weight classes, 10 have no "Ring" Champions. Oh? so this is what mean? Does this mean that Antonio Margarito is not a real world champion because he doesn't have a linear win on his record?
"The Ring Champion is just a pacifier for the cry babies that don't have a real belt from any of the private sanctioning bodies." Who said that?
For you edification:
Undisputed Champion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Every boxer listed has been in my lifetime. Example:
List of undisputed boxing champions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Professional boxing is evolving.