Who suffered worse in their defeat, Cotto or Pavlik?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lance Uppercut

Cotto was beaten into submission

Pavlik lost a 12 round decision.


That doesn't seem like much of a choice to me.

---

excatly. it has to be cotto he was a huge favorite probably even a bigger fav than pavlik was against bhop. and everybody was calling the battle fight of the year, and alot of people werent to happy that kelly was going to fight bhop and look wat happened there. i mean dont get me wrong kelly got his pants pulled down in front of the whole class but cotto got beat up in front of the whole school and gave up against a guy that everybody thought he could beat.

Cotto was fighting the naturally bigger man...Pavlik was the naturally bigger man AND he was 17 years younger than B-Hop.....who should be worried? Margarito is the best welterweight, I don't know if Hopkins is the best at 175 or 168....I don't know if he's top 5....it's like trying to rank where De la Hoya is he doesn't fight often enough or in a single weight class.

Pavliks loss is worse. If cotto n magarito have a rematch there is a good chance cotto will win because it was a close fight up untill the end. Theres no way in hell i can see pavlic ever beating hopkins cos he got scholled for an entire 12 rounds.