At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nameless

To sums it up in 5 words: terrible mismatch due to size.

---

Well said, terrible mismatch due to size.... Guess you voted "JMM should not fight Cotto at all ever..." ... ;)
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C-Lo

Not possible to do when the gonads are occupied by you...



Woah! I thought my post on him was bad...

It's funny because he's the reason people's rep points have been going up. I guess we should thank him. Each time someone makes fun of him, they get repped by everyone who wants him out of here. And that's A LOT OF PEOPLE!

---

That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...:(

Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage? ;)
.

---

Wow....Spam-boxer is falling off ??? .Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties

---

Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...

Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

Exactly.

The main board's been better since the Pacquaio baord? Is there nearly as much stuff as there used to be? No. This seems like small stuff compared to when there were 80 Pac threads in the first three pages of the main board a week or so ago.

---

I agree that it's been good that the Pac stuff has been largely contained. This particular thread just seemed too obvious though and designed to provoke strong reactions. I agree that people shouldn't get too personal on the main boards and that is where this one slipped. I've no issues with the thread being pulled, just issues with the thread starters agenda and manipulation. It isn't a major issue and from a distance looks trite. But knowing xaduboxers history, I suppose it just grates with some people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

You guys need to understand that it's really hard to talk about Cotto, Floyd, Marquez, Hatton, or any fighter from 135 to 147 without bringing up Pacquiao's name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

He constantly starts this stuff. You can tell from the titles and polls that the stuff is random and inherently bound to provoke harsh responses. Maybe these threads shouldn't be being started to begin with. That is the root of the problem here. All of these threads end up getting moved or put into Spam. There is a pattern here.

You could argue that peoples responses are too strong. But when the matador is waving his red towel around people are bound to see red. It's getting old.

---

Then tell me what's the problem with my poll? It's a legit question, JMM facing PBF now might face Cotto later...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

---

I thought it was the boys in blue that controlled the trolls. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.

---

You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:

Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.

Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:

How about a look of who shits on the front-lawn first eh in regards to responses.?Might as well give him a top hat.Do the math.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

---

I thought it was the boys in blue that controlled the trolls. ;)

---

We can't ban people for being annoying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

---

I thought it was the boys in blue that controlled the trolls. ;)

---

We can't ban people for being annoying.

---

that is what neg rep's are for.