Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jimanuel Boogustus
I think the great thing about Pernell (or should I say 'the thing that defines his greatness') is that absolutely NO fighter (at 135/ 140) beats him 5/5... probably not even 3/3.
He's that good.
I agree at 135 to 140 I really don't see anyone in the 2 division's history can beat prime Whitaker.
At 147 the big welterweights like Leonard and Hearns would be suitable candidates to beat him, but even then I don't see them knocking him out or flat out dominating Whitaker, the guy's defense and boxing skills were too good.
And Tszyu doesn't have smarts or all around ability to beat Whitaker at 140 imo. Knocking out Zab Judah another southpaw and trying to knockout prime Whitaker are entirely 2 different things.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
I don't think that whitaker was to out of prime when Dela Hoya fought him.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
I don't think that whitaker was to out of prime when Dela Hoya fought him.
Yes he was, unfortunately drugs were beginninng to play a role with his performances around this time. Still was very good but definitely not prime
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
It seems people see Tszyu as a one dimensional straight forward fighter....
For those with open minds, check this out...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA-PybmMePA
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
I never thought that Whitaker was strong enough offensively to be considered an all-time great fighter. Much of his defense involved being to far away to hit back or not being in position to counter. Duran beats him, Emile Griffith beats him, Napoles, Luis Rodriguez, possibly Benitez. Buddy McGirt nearly won their first fight, fighting one-handed. Smart guys beat him.
Also, if he had tried a lot of his tricks (squatting to knee level, grabbing the opponent's leg in clinches, etc...) Duran (or Basilio or Zivic or Greb or Walker) would've kicked him in the face.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Mayweather, Leonard and Hearns I would favor to beat Whitaker.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
I think mayweather beats at any weight they occupy, he's harder to hit, faster, bigger, and he works harder. He's simply better than Whitaker.
Duran also likely beats him, Whitaker couldn't move like Leonard did, and Duran would just go to the body and make an ugly inside fight, but he's bigger and better than jcc.
Leonard and hearns I think they beat him because both are excellent fighters with a huge size advantage while both are also faster than him.
Aaron Pryor and pacquiao both best whitaker because they have to great a combination of speed, output and pressure.
I've watched a lot of Whitaker, and he's one of my favorites, but he simply relied on his reflexes far too much, the actual technique needed against a lot of these guys' speed simply isn't there, and he didn't control the ring the same way a lot these guys did.
I actually had to CC this post, hard to fault it really.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
A prime Whitaker was at lightweight he was very good at welterweight but he was an ATG at lightweight.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
He was at the bad end of some decision but he had quiet the ran at lw i think Mosley might give him some trouble at lw. As for Welter i believe Hearns and Leonard would be to big and to trong for him. Then you radar who i think would make a very boring fight not sure what it look like or who win.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Pep was a small featherweight and watching those two fight would not garner high expectations.
Lots of people could and many would beat Whitaker. I’m not even going to touch 147 because Whitaker has no business being in the conversation. 135 and 140 can be combined for this as most of the lightweights in history could have campaigned there if the weight class existed and many of them did when it did.
Sam Langford Yup, that Langford.
Joe Gans
Eddie Perkins
Benny Leonard
Carlos Ortiz
Henry Armstrong
Beau Jack
Wilfredo Benitez
Niccolino Locche and the bonus would be its use as a sleep aid.
Shane Mosley
Duilio Loi
Roberto Duran
Ike Williams
Barney Ross
Antonio Cervantes
Juan Coggi
Jack Berg
Floyd Mayweather bit of another sleeper
Tony Cazoneri
Ricky Hatton
Alexis Arguello
Freddie Welsh
Jose Louis Castillo
Joe Brown
Ken Buchanan
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Pep was a small featherweight and watching those two fight would not garner high expectations.
Lots of people could and many would beat Whitaker. I’m not even going to touch 147 because Whitaker has no business being in the conversation. 135 and 140 can be combined for this as most of the lightweights in history could have campaigned there if the weight class existed and many of them did when it did.
Sam Langford Yup, that Langford.
Joe Gans
Eddie Perkins
Benny Leonard
Carlos Ortiz
Henry Armstrong
Beau Jack
Wilfredo Benitez
Niccolino Locche and the bonus would be its use as a sleep aid.
Shane Mosley
Duilio Loi
Roberto Duran
Ike Williams
Barney Ross
Antonio Cervantes
Juan Coggi
Jack Berg
Floyd Mayweather bit of another sleeper
Tony Cazoneri
Ricky Hatton
Alexis Arguello
Freddie Welsh
Jose Louis Castillo
Joe Brown
Ken Buchanan
IMO he was too slick for a bunch of the guys on that list, especially Hatton and Castillo
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
The best chances
At 135lb
Duran -Late stoppage win for Duran
Arguello- Whitaker wins a close decision
Mosley- Mosley was at his best at Lightweight, can Sweet Pea withstand the power?
At 140lb
Pryor- It is almost hard to imagine the frustration Pryor would have trying to catch him?
Tszyu- He had ring smarts, was experienced and handled southpaws better than most, i think he lands one?
Mayweather - I just don't see Whitaker beating him?
Whitaker is an all time great, certainly a top 3 Lightweight of all time, it gets more difficult for him as he moves up in weight.
Can you imagine Whitaker V Loche?
Would Salvador Sanchez have made it to Lightweight by the late 80's had he lived? They almost certainly would've met sometime 1987-88 as Sanchez wouldn't have turned 30 until 1989.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
IMO he was too slick for a bunch of the guys on that list, especially Hatton and Castillo
That is fair. Hatton was something else around the time of Zu and Castillo might be one of the most over looked Mexican fighters ever.
Re: Who would have beaten a prime Whitaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
IMO he was too slick for a bunch of the guys on that list, especially Hatton and Castillo
That is fair. Hatton was something else around the time of Zu and Castillo might be one of the most over looked Mexican fighters ever.
I understand that but at 135 or 140 IMO Whitaker would have just pot shotted Hatton all night and would just pick Castillo apart, Whitaker had more pop than what most people like to admit