Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?
id like to have seen him fight witter
much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
why would witter have been a shocking opponent?
only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something
what pedigree does ortiz have?
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
why would witter have been a shocking opponent?
only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something
what pedigree does ortiz have?
Well he hasn't fought in a year and half and has said himself he can't physically make 140 anymore. He'd also be 37 by the time the fight comes round, and after such a long lay off that won't be a good thing. He's not particularly relevant now, in his last fight he lost to Alexander who we've all seen isn't at the level required to be at the top of the 140 division yet. And he also lost to Bradley, so I don't see any sense in taking on someone that 2 of your main rivals have already beaten... I just think it would have been a bad fight to make. He's fading, if not shot, has had a long lay off and would be very weight drained. I'm glad it wasn't made.
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
Very Oscar De La Hoya'ish.
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
Very Oscar De La Hoya'ish.
Agreed.
Sky used to be quite picky with their ppvs to be fair to them, only used to charge for THE fights.
Now they charge £15 for any old shite.
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?
id like to have seen him fight witter
much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
why would witter have been a shocking opponent?
only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something
what pedigree does ortiz have?
Witter just lost again, he's pretty much done IMO. He gassed out again.
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cressa121
Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?
id like to have seen him fight witter
much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.
why would witter have been a shocking opponent?
only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something
what pedigree does ortiz have?
Witter just lost again, he's pretty much done IMO. He gassed out again.
Witter would have been a shocking opponent for Khan based on the 5 rounds i saw last night. ;D
Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
why would witter have been a shocking opponent?
only 3 fights ago he was world champ with 3 defenses or something
what pedigree does ortiz have?
Witter just lost again, he's pretty much done IMO. He gassed out again.
Witter would have been a shocking opponent for Khan based on the 5 rounds i saw last night. ;D
I think we all knew it before hand. Eric was clinging on to Witter's past glories.
