Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Carl Froch is bad bad man.. He's a battle tested warrior who has proved himself over and over against the best.. That's no fraud..
A fraud is someone like Ricky Hatton.
He's a fraud based on the way he's viewed. I've heard some call him a great fighter? Are you fucking kidding me? I'll let good slide when talking about him. Great is just stupidity. People are getting fooled by his recent fights. Thinking he's more than he is. Showing there true stupidity.
He holds a win over Jermaine Taylor. But he didn't really beat Taylor. Taylor and that suspect stamina of his his beat Taylor. Everybody, including the announcers were waiting for the fade to come up. Carl was just at the right place at the right time. You replace Carl with lets say Brian McGee and you got the same outcome. Taylor running out of gas. Than you got the gift that was the Dirrell fight. Watching this fight a couple of times and I see no way possible Fraud won. You put this fight in fucking Jupiter or Saturn and you got a clear Dirrell win. Only in moronic Nottingham is this a Fraud win. Not only that but they had him winning by 3 points. 3 fucking points! What the fuck were they scoring? How was Carl scoring points? The rabbit punches? The throw downs? Those ain't point scoring activities. I don't deny Dirrell ran like a coward and at times held like a queer. But he still landed more scoring punches. That can't be ignored. Based on that it really is an easy Dirrell win. Fraud's whore was already in Dirrell's locker room with her panties off thinking her current meal ticket had lost. It was that clear. After robbing Dirrell, Fraud gets out fought by a close to being shot, one eye Kessler. Does he take the loss like a man? No. He whines and complains like a bitch. Than he threatens to withdraw from the tournament if he was forced to honor the contract he willingly signed and made to fight in his opponents backyard. Some warrior. After reaching a compromise that isn't even necessary he beats the oh so mediocre Arthur Abraham. He reaches the finals by beating 97 year old Glen Johnson. While I too had Carl winning the fight, it was by no means a 6 point win for him. Clearly the judge was in the pocket. Just in case. Really Carl's best win is over Jean Pascal. A fighter who is in the same boat as Carl. Not as good as he's made out to be.
The Ward fight is it for Fraud. He beats him and everything disappears. He becomes legit. If he loses (like expected) in a way like Green or Kessler lost and he proves the name Fraud stands.
Calling him Fraud is severe though. Do you call Ward a fraud? Ward has beat who? Kessler is his defining victory and Kessler's best win was over Froch! Other than Kessler, who has Ward really beat? I give him credit for the Bika win but most people don't give him much credit for it. Bute beat Bika better too.
Froch has travelled to fight his opponents. Ward has fought every single of his major fights in California. Have to respect Froch for traveling.
His best win is over Pascal. Plain and simple. People were all over Bhop for drawing with Pascal and beating Pascal. Froch outright beat him. No if ands or buts about it. That is his only great win though. I agree with that.
I wonder about some of the established posters here at times. In case y'all didn't notice, a lot of it is just name play. Andre Ward doesn't turn into Andre Fraud very easily. Carl Froch. Carl Fraud. Not to hard to figure out. While I don't consider Carl to be a fraud along the likes of his relative in name Fraudley Harrison. I don't consider him to be as good as he's made out to be either. Not even close. Every big win he's had (aside from the Pascal one) has come with an *. The Ward fight if he can score a legit win will erase remove all doubt.
As for Ward? The win over Kessler trumps everything Carl has done. It's not just that he beat him. But the way he beat him. He dominated him. Yes there were some issues regarding butts. But even without them I don't see Kessler doing that much better. It was gonna be a L for him no matter what
Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?
I actually think Andre Fraud sounds fuckin genius! ;D
A lot better than Carl Fraud anyway. Carl Fraud just sounds daft.
But yeah whatever, if you wanna call him a fraud because 'someone' (:rolleyes:) else called him great then your just a daft as 'they' were for calling him great in the first place :p ;D