Re: Bert Sugar on Mike Tyson, his legacy and chances against the Klitchko's
[QUOTE=El Kabong;1020735]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
piye
You can't chose who's in your era, the Klitschko brothers have fought and beaten everyone they can, you can't bring up guys they never had a chance to fight, that's fucking idiotic.
Oh I see, but when disussing Marciano you CAN. :cool:
Re: Bert Sugar on Mike Tyson, his legacy and chances against the Klitchko's
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
piye
I think we can agree to disagree, both brothers are very good but have never beaten anyone of note. Vitali had the chance to and he lost so you can' give credit to these guys for how you think they may have stood up.
The Holmes that Tyson beat had more left in the tank than the Lewis that Vitali fought, Razor Rudock was better than Haye and Peter, Tim wither spoon and Bruno are miles better than Tony Thompson and Thomas Adamek and there is no one of the quality of a Michael spinks on the record of the brothers Grim why do they deserve credit when they have beaten no one of note?
I declare shenanigans on Holmes having more left in the tank than Lewis. Ruddock was exactly like Sam Peter, he had weight issues, but Ruddock also had a dodgey chin and stamina. Razor was a more dynamic puncher, but that was all.
You can't chose who's in your era, the Klitschko brothers have fought and beaten everyone they can, you can't bring up guys they never had a chance to fight, that's fucking idiotic.
All right mate of course the Holmes that fought tyson had more in the tank than the Lewis that fought Klitscho one retired after the fight one fought on for years running evander Holyfield close and beating Ray Mercer.
As for Sam Peter being on a level with Ruddock are you serious? You have obviously never watched Rudock fight.
Re: Bert Sugar on Mike Tyson, his legacy and chances against the Klitchko's
Rudduck would have taken Sam Peters head off.
