Maybe maybe not but roberto duran said that chisora only looked good against helenius because helenius was injured, so i felt i needed to address that issue :)
Printable View
Maybe maybe not but roberto duran said that chisora only looked good against helenius because helenius was injured, so i felt i needed to address that issue :)
I was never sold on Helenius being all that big of a threat either....too robotic and slow. Sure he has power, but he's so limited...it was only a matter of time before someone gave him trouble. I am happy that it was Chisora as before that Wlad was catching hell for having signed to fight him....wouldn't have really made a difference either way. Wlad would ALWAYS beat Chisora, he'd always catch hell for having fought him/agreed to fight him, and after that Chisora would be labled a "bum" (rightfully or wrongfully deserved)....it's just the way of the world.
People say Buster Douglas had no chance and beat Tyson but the big difference here is that Buster could throw crisp, straight shots.
I would barely give Chisora a chance if he could straighten his shots to make them more powerful once he is on the inside to maybe keep Vitali honest (although Lennox couldn't keep Vitali off even with that hellacious uppercut).
Also there wasn't that huge size disparity between Tyson and Douglas..
I can't see Chisora doing it even though I hope he does..the great thing about boxing is that we've all had to eat humble pie about some fights where we gave one fighter no chance - i.e Oscar vs Pac, Pac vs Marquez 3 etc
Even Chisora knows he is not going to win, you can just tell.