Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
I can assure you this isnt happening and is a very weak defence in this discussion
give me one example in any of my posts about any other fighter where my judgement is clouded by my fellings towards the fighter
you are very wrong with this statement
to me its very simple
there is a lot of evidence to back up my claims, sam peter 2 round 1 for example (an exanple i didnt hand pick), klit holds more than he punches until he is in a very strong position, holding is against the rules yet he is never warned until it is superficial
to me the situation is all very corrupt and it is plainly obviously happening, i can understand how a boxing fan can find this difficult to believe/accept, i dont understand how anyone cant watch this and at least think there is something slightly wrong
What you're telling me is that Wlad has no real significant boxing skill to speak of, and he pays off the officials of all his fights to let him hold and lean on guys to win, because other than being 6'6'' and 250 he has no other tools that would let him beat the guys he beats.
That just reeks of hater, man. It's simply not true.
I've had this argument with people trying to discredit Wlad for years.
"WLADS ONLY GOOD BECAUSE HE'S SO TALL!!!"
Really? Well how come Ty Fields isn't the world champ? How come Mike "The Giant" White didn't win a world title back in the 90s?
You need the skill, knowledge and expertise to go along with the physical advantages. Wlad has a great jab, a great right hand and a mean left hook. He has great footwork for a heavyweight and knows how to control distance and range. That's a skill. That's the art of boxing.
Does he tie guys up on the inside a lot? Yeah. But so did Muhammad Ali. Tying guys up is a technique, it's not the be-all end-all of his fighting game.
To make a claim that he's only champ because he can hold completely discredits you. You're a hater. You have no credibility on this topic.