kell brooks next fight..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by emma

no not you, this other guy on this other site.

---

ohhh...np then ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmanhatton

half his size for one thts impossible and ur saying mario kinderlan is rubbish i know tht was at amatuer but he was the best p4p amatuer of the last 10 yrs
and kell brook fights worse opponants trust me his debut was against a guy who is 31-220
he fought brian coleman who is 24-141 khans opponants are a higher level and the fact brook didnt stop buckley on his debut is hillarious

---

Naseem never stopped buckley first time round. He did in his 10th fight tho. I dont think its that funny that he didnt stop somebody with over 250 fights worth of experience, on his debut. Michael Gomez never stopped Buckley, as didn't Pual Ingle, as didn't Michael Brodie and neither did good prospect John Murray (current wbc world youth champ), on his debut. But i agree that kahns opponents have been better, even tho i feel most have been a division smaller.

250 fights of experience of which they have lost 80%

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmanhatton

half his size for one thts impossible and ur saying mario kinderlan is rubbish i know tht was at amatuer but he was the best p4p amatuer of the last 10 yrs
and kell brook fights worse opponants trust me his debut was against a guy who is 31-220
he fought brian coleman who is 24-141 khans opponants are a higher level and the fact brook didnt stop buckley on his debut is hillarious

---

Naseem never stopped buckley first time round. He did in his 10th fight tho. I dont think its that funny that he didnt stop somebody with over 250 fights worth of experience, on his debut. Michael Gomez never stopped Buckley, as didn't Pual Ingle, as didn't Michael Brodie and neither did good prospect John Murray (current wbc world youth champ), on his debut. But i agree that kahns opponents have been better, even tho i feel most have been a division smaller.

---

Neither did Scott Harrison in his 2 fights with Buckley! ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmanhatton

half his size for one thts impossible and ur saying mario kinderlan is rubbish i know tht was at amatuer but he was the best p4p amatuer of the last 10 yrs
and kell brook fights worse opponants trust me his debut was against a guy who is 31-220
he fought brian coleman who is 24-141 khans opponants are a higher level and the fact brook didnt stop buckley on his debut is hillarious

---

Naseem never stopped buckley first time round. He did in his 10th fight tho. I dont think its that funny that he didnt stop somebody with over 250 fights worth of experience, on his debut. Michael Gomez never stopped Buckley, as didn't Pual Ingle, as didn't Michael Brodie and neither did good prospect John Murray (current wbc world youth champ), on his debut. But i agree that kahns opponents have been better, even tho i feel most have been a division smaller.

---

i hope your reading this hitmanhatton.

ye and maybe u shud so u realise there are actually other boxers around who alot fucking better than brook

i never said there wasnt any boxers better then brook did i?. ???

his the only fighter u have a good word to say about

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmanhatton

his the only fighter u have a good word to say about

---

In a thread about Kell Brooks,started by her,i would say that was justified! ;)

ye but when tht is the only threads she has posted in (ones about kell brook) and then trys to argue with me about boxing when she knows one fighter not actually boxing

Yeh, get off her back you little maggot ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmanhatton

ur talking shit now there not as bad as amirs thts why they been beat like 200 times they are shit and reason they cn take the shots is becus brook hits like a bitch

---

Quote:

---

u really do talk shit love wht evidence have u got that amir cant take shots ? are u stupid or something there is a reason tht amir is better known and its obvious he is just the better fighter

---

If that's your idea of a reasoned boxing argument then you've no right to slag anyone elses knowledge! ;)
And your take on Peter Buckley is disrespectful to say the least,about an honest,good pro who is there to make a living helping young boxers get the rounds in!(boxing rounds,that is!) ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmanhatton

ye but when tht is the only threads she has posted in (ones about kell brook) and then trys to argue with me about boxing when she knows one fighter not actually boxing

---

i do know about boxing but im not an expert.like ive said before. ::** and i do have a good word to say about other boxers apart from kell.but this is a 'kell brook' thread.

i was trying to be reasonable till she come out with all this khans opponents are from outta space shit or wtever it was

im not surprised brook couldnt stop buckley. not many do. check out his record and look who buckley has taken the distance. buckley is a journeyman and doesnt really come to win (without being disrespectful) just to survive. but he survives well and its a lot harder to stop someone who is just constantly defending that to someone who will come to fight and be more open.