Is the world better off without Saddam, George?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust

Those 2 little ass wipes Dick Cheney and George Bush have nothing to fall back on now that in retrospect it can be seen that their entire effort in Iraq was an abject failure not to mention a genocide. Is the world better off without Saddam Hussein.

Hahaha. You tell me ...let's take a look at who filled in the vacuum after Saddam Hussein was removed. It looks like isis to me and all these other ass wipe groups beheading people and stuff like that. George Bush Dick Cheney Donald Rumsfeld all fail and the whole lot of those piece of s*** abject failure and in many ways they are responsible for what is happening now

---

"A BIG DICK"

It was Dick Chaney who convinced George Bush 'W' to make that foolish decision.

Dick Cheney > "We must remove Saddam Hussien, at all costs."

Be Careful In What You Ask For, You Just May Get It.

https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=OIP.M97...95&w=141&h=125

DICK cheney raked over the coals by isis, drawn and quartered and tarred and feathered and then thrown to the wild dogs of the plains in central Africa to be ripped apart and ground up and eaten and then pass thru the intestinal tract of wild beasts and then SHIT OUT IN SMELLY RANCID PILES OF CURLY-CUE SHIT DUNG DFFECES LIKE WHAT HE REALLY IS.

Who said this?

No googling.

Well, just as it’s important, I think, for a president to know when to commit U.S. forces to combat, it’s also important to know when not to commit U.S. forces to combat. I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do? Who would we put in power? What kind of government would we have? Would it be a Sunni government, a Shi’a government, a Kurdish government? Would it be secular, along the lines of the Ba’ath Party?
Would it be fundamentalist Islamic? I do not think the United States wants to have U.S. military forces accept casualties and accept the responsibility of trying to govern Iraq. I think it makes no sense at all.


....................................

If you can take down the central government of Iraq, you can easily see pieces of Iraq fly off. Part of it the Syrians would like to have in the West. Part of Eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim — fought over for eight years.
In the North you have the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It’s a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Who said this?

No googling.

Well, just as it’s important, I think, for a president to know when to commit U.S. forces to combat, it’s also important to know when not to commit U.S. forces to combat. I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do? Who would we put in power? What kind of government would we have? Would it be a Sunni government, a Shi’a government, a Kurdish government? Would it be secular, along the lines of the Ba’ath Party?
Would it be fundamentalist Islamic? I do not think the United States wants to have U.S. military forces accept casualties and accept the responsibility of trying to govern Iraq. I think it makes no sense at all.


....................................

If you can take down the central government of Iraq, you can easily see pieces of Iraq fly off. Part of it the Syrians would like to have in the West. Part of Eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim — fought over for eight years.
In the North you have the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It’s a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.

---

Saddam Hussein: I promise you this will be the mother of all wars

brock, how would you feel if I told you that under the regime of President Barack Hussein Obama MMM MMM MMM.....that America armed ISIS?

How is Putin feeling now? Imagine if Russia had an opposition party.

Putin has strarted a war against Isis and he's already had a passenger plane shot down and a military jet. And he's done nothing! The world is laughing at Russia and its weak leader! Turkey shoots a jet down and Putin does nothing! Isis blow a passenger plane up and kill Russian civilians and Putin drops a few little bobms in return! We need a strong leader who knows how to deal with these people!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing

Who said this?

No googling.

Well, just as it’s important, I think, for a president to know when to commit U.S. forces to combat, it’s also important to know when not to commit U.S. forces to combat. I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do? Who would we put in power? What kind of government would we have? Would it be a Sunni government, a Shi’a government, a Kurdish government? Would it be secular, along the lines of the Ba’ath Party?
Would it be fundamentalist Islamic? I do not think the United States wants to have U.S. military forces accept casualties and accept the responsibility of trying to govern Iraq. I think it makes no sense at all.


....................................

If you can take down the central government of Iraq, you can easily see pieces of Iraq fly off. Part of it the Syrians would like to have in the West. Part of Eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim — fought over for eight years.
In the North you have the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It’s a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.

---

Dick Cheney.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Kabong

brock, how would you feel if I told you that under the regime of President Barack Hussein Obama MMM MMM MMM.....that America armed ISIS?

---

I would feel that insane Hussein Obama was a piece of s*** but I already knew that Lyle, so it would probably just make me feel even more like he is the worst president in the history of the United States more than I already thought so before

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust

Those 2 little ass wipes Dick Cheney and George Bush have nothing to fall back on now that in retrospect it can be seen that their entire effort in Iraq was an abject failure not to mention a genocide. Is the world better off without Saddam Hussein.

Hahaha. You tell me ...let's take a look at who filled in the vacuum after Saddam Hussein was removed. It looks like isis to me and all these other ass wipe groups beheading people and stuff like that. George Bush Dick Cheney Donald Rumsfeld all fail and the whole lot of those piece of s*** abject failure and in many ways they are responsible for what is happening now

---

"A BIG DICK"

It was Dick Chaney who convinced George Bush 'W' to make that foolish decision.

Dick Cheney > "We must remove Saddam Hussien, at all costs."

Be Careful In What You Ask For, You Just May Get It.

https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=OIP.M97...95&w=141&h=125

---

Yup Hehehe Bush led from behind.....the VP


Now every president afterwards has to contend with an uncontrollable situation all because God told Bush Jr to invade

Glad I'm not silly enough to think if ISIS gets destroyed, another group of depraved killers won't pop up with a new name.

With the same agenda.