And nafta is just tinkering and means nothing right. I thought the trade shit was going to ruin relations and the economy, now it happens and it’s “just tinkering” ha ha you can’t even talk to these people.
Printable View
And nafta is just tinkering and means nothing right. I thought the trade shit was going to ruin relations and the economy, now it happens and it’s “just tinkering” ha ha you can’t even talk to these people.
As usual you attack the source of the information rather than reply to the factual stuff therein. I didn't see the Vox article. I just saw that on twitter and it looked accurate to me. The woman answered all the questions, the man dodged answering most of the questions he was asked or started questioning the questioner or whatever. It kind of spoke for itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Vox? Yeah because that's just a middle of the road kinda news isn't it :-\Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
That graph is fucking pathetic even for you which is why you linked to a tweet instead of to the graph itself because well you're a pussy.
Here I'll ask YOU a direct question and we'll see how you respond "Was Dr. Christine Blasey Ford honest in her testimony?" ;D
As long as you say so Kirkland :thumb:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
All I'll say is WE'LL SEE
Even Trump said she was credible Lyle. Why he would do that I don't know when he might be facing a dozen credible witnesses in committe hearings soon. Even Foc news said she was credible and her testimony was a diaster for the GOP.
It's not me saying so about this Q conspiracy stuff Lyle. So far not one of his predictions has turned out to be true and there's a list of dozens of his predictions that have turned out to be wrong. Yet you still believe it's going to happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
I didn't post any link to anything. It's been reported in basically every newspaper. If you read a paper instead of getting your news from talk radio and similar you'd know as well instead of going through life being permanently ignorant and misinformed about everything.
Here's one article that lists the debt as between sixty and two hundred thousand. It later transpires that it was over a hundred. If you manage to make it through the article youll see how that much debt would have been crippling him. According to Kavanaugh he ran that much debt up buying baseball tickets for his friends but luckily just before he got nominated they all anonymously paid him back for all the tickets he'd bought them, and that's all we get to know. Maybe something for the FBI to look at or a Democratic committee if they do win the midterms.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/12/supr...card-debt.html
And I've never said anything like that about the trade situation. Currnently Trump is raising twenty billion in taxes, sorry tariffs, on the American consumer on Chinese goods they buy. But that's peanuts in a twenty thousand billion economy. You can probably do the maths. It does have the possibility to escalate but if the new NAFTA agreement is anything to go by, where Canada and Mexico just agree to a bunch of adjustments that they'd already agreed to in the TPP treaty that didn't get signed then Trump will allow China to offer a bunch of window dressing and when they do he'll sell it as the greatest deal ever made.
Of course he's eventually got a pudding/eating scenario to deal with. When it becomes clear that the new NAFTA agreement and probable new China agreement makes zero significant difference to the US economy and the trade deficit continues to increase, he'll have to find some way of explaining it.
Like to bet on whether the trade deficit will be bigget one calendar year after the new NAFTA deal is signed? Yeah.
And here's what happens when you give a gigantic tax cut to the top one percent. All that money has to go somewhere:
Stock investors are welcoming money-losing companies into the public markets this year with open arms.
About 83% of U.S.-listed initial public offerings in 2018’s first three quarters involve companies that lost money in the 12 months leading up to their debut, according to data compiled by University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter. That is the highest proportion on record, according to Mr. Ritter, an IPO expert whose data goes back to 1980.
Some analysts and market watchers are concerned. They see similarities with the dot-com bubble of nearly two decades ago that left many investors with enormous losses. The prior high-water mark for money-losing companies going public was 2000, when 81% of stock-market debutantes were unprofitable, according to Mr. Ritter’s data.
Kevin Landis, chief investment officer of tech-focused Firsthand Capital Management, said he is wary of money rushing into unprofitable companies. “The lesson from 2000 is don’t chase what everyone else is chasing,” he said.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/red-ink...ket-1538388000
Well the source is Vox and they aren't all that reliable in presenting a story which is truthful. They are unashamed of being heavily slanted to the left. "It looked accurate to me"....yeah I don't doubt it did. I guess it didn't strike you as to why Judge Kavanaugh wouldn't answer certain questions (and that's ASSUMING their graph is correct) what with being the accused in that situation. For example Kamala Harris did her little grandstanding asking if Judge Kavanaugh had contact with anyone associated with a specific law firm...she said "It's a very specific question"....which yeah the question is specifically itself, however the terms are quite broad 'anyone' 'associated with' ....so runners? Clerks? Janitors? we don't know who she meant because she refused to clarify and Judge Kavanaugh even asked for a roster, she refused to provide, Judge asked for clarification and she refused. How eager to respond to a question like that would YOU be what with being in front of Congress facing penalty of perjury even if you made an innocent mistake and misremembered something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
Trump is playing along with the Democrats because he knows they have nothing....Dr. Ford the most credible....so credible that she's the ONLY ONE telling her story. 4 people have refuted her under penalty of felony perjury....do you like those odds Kirkland? Does that inspire confidence in you?
Don't believe Q, fine, I don't really care if you believe it or not....WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS...or hey you feel free to tell us all what happens, go on @Kirkland Laing tell us all what happens to Kavanaugh, to Trump, what happens in the midterms? Please DO TELL Kirkland.
“It would seem to me that if people are going to be identified this ought to be held very close and not." - Sen. Diane Feinstein
"I think the investigation ought to be closely held," she reiterated
Hey Kirk does that sound like confidence to you? It kinda tells me that the FBI report won't have the goods on Kavanaugh but want to keep up appearances......awww bless their evil little black hearts.
I think Kirk is trolling he will not acknowledge anything positive trump has done, is this how the majority of trump haters are or is this a technique of trolls
Kirk, the Angel of Light has spoken.
Well let's be honest here Brett Kavanaugh threw ice on someone during a bar fight when he was 21 years old....it's not like Keith Ellison abused his girlfriend recently or Barack Obama admitted cocaine use during his youth or Beto O'Rourke driving drunk, crashing his car, fleeing the scene, and later denying what's on the police report.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
I mean this Brett Kavanaugh is a crazy man....he might even still......(whispering) drink beer.....he may even have 2 or 3 (gasp).
******bwett stole my gi joe when we were 6 *******
I smell the sulfur wafting from my keyboard as his darkness postsQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
53-47
??Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
He just gave you the unanimous decision after what looks like a six-round fight based on his scoring system. I heard they do that down in North Carolina after they get the scorecards in they rub a little mustard and tally the cards. 😁. Lyle I hope I didn't just offend you 😁 or do you also have the 🎻🎻Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus??Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
In a letter released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, seemingly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.
The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor said she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford helping a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.
He also claimed Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a small, 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.
Redacted "ex boyfriends" 20 yr ago has to be at least 1.5 Tucker Carlson bow ties below testifying under oath. Who exactly went to air with that Mr Magoo speculative horse shat on Fox. If thats the level deemed necessary to bolster and sustain a Supreme court nominee then we're all equally fooked.
Trump taking the piss out of a victim of violence in his speech to get cheap laughs is way out of order. Hope his family never have to go through that trauma.
ALLEGED victim of violence.
****ALLEGED****
But unsubstantiated things from 36 years ago is OKQuote:
Originally Posted by Spicoli
Did you see the Swetnick interview holy dumpster fire Batman!Quote:
Originally Posted by Spicoli
They kept on saying "spiked the punch"....and then Swetnick calls it "Grain alcohol punch"...so what they added MORE Everclear to it? :dontknow:
Are you shitting me Master? Did you listen to her testimony? I certainly did and yeah it doesn't add up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Things Christine Blasey Ford knows for ABSOLUTE CERTAIN: She had 1 beer, there was laughter at some point in time
Things Christine Blasey Ford DOESN'T know for absolute certain: what year the party was, what day the party was, what time the party was, what house the party was at, what neighborhood the party was in, how many people were there, who specifically was there...I mean she's mentioned various people 100% of whom have rebuked her claims under penalty of felony perjury.
I and plenty other Americans were ready to listen to her story....I have listened, I don't think she's being honest and I think the Democrats know that as well. Why do I think that? Well because if the Democrats could have immediately torpedoed Judge Kavanaugh's nomination they would have, they had all the information in July, they waited, why? Because they knew how flimsy this all is. It worked against Roy Moore, it didn't work on Trump and it's not working on Judge Kavanaugh....I feel for REAL victims not political stooges.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Doi39S_W0AEp3Yh.jpg
****bwett stole my gi joe when we were 6 ******
“My hope is that... we ask ourselves whether this [Kavanaugh] is the right person... not whether he’s innocent or guilty... but ultimately whether enough questions have been raised...” - Senator Cory 'Spartacus' Booker
The mask slips
Trump did not have to behave like an ass. He should be better than that but maybe that his attitude on women in general.
The media doesn't have to behave like asses either....doesn't stop them from doing it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Yeah I'm sure it's his attitude on women in general :shakehead: it's why he hired Kellyanne Conway, it's why he hired Sarah Huckabee Sanders, it's why he hired Nikki Haley.
Christine Blasey Ford is a LIAR, a political operative attempting to torpedo the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice. She deserves all the mocking she can handle.
Saturday Night Live mocked Brett Kavanaugh....he's not been found guilty of ANYTHING is that kosher to you or is it cool because he's a man so he can handle a little accusation of being a gang rapist, sorry, no rapist, sorry no sexual predator, sorry no an alcoholic, sorry no an angry drunk, sorry no a guy who drinks until he passes out, sorry no a guy who one time threw ice in a person's face during a bar fight....I get confused with how much he's been accused of and how the story keeps changing....and yet people believe Dr. Ford....WHY? What has she said that is credible and backed up with evidence or don't we care about those things anymore? Are we back at witch trials? "Brett Kavanaugh's familiar found me in my dreams and the next morning my livestock was dead"
The second door she had installed in her house was #1 in 2008 (permits are required for such you know) not 2012 as Dr. Ford said and #2 was for either Renters OR for her at home office used for therapy sessions and the like....and that's proof of her not telling the truth.
Is it Politically Incorrect to say that not all women tell the truth? What happened to innocent until proven guilty in this knee jerk reaction shallow social media atmosphere led by sjw?
Trump still should be better than all that. I do not care about how many women he has recruited I expect him to act like the the President of the US of A.
Would u rather we start bombing more shit like the last three who spoke much betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
bwaaaaHAHAHA 👍Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusWould u rather we start bombing more shit like the last three who spoke much betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Duke Lacrosse, UVA Rolling Stone story, Tawana Brawley, Susan Smith....women are just as capable of deceit as men are and I'd venture to guess that women would be more likely to be believed as well. 1 lying woman shouldn't discredit all women just as 1 lying man shouldn't discredit all men, but just look at the facts, look at what is provable, look at inconsistencies in the story.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is not a credible source of information because she's got nothing to back up her claims. And other things she's outright lied about, fear of flying for example, the second door to the house, those are lies provable lies.
He is almost three times as bad. 121 bombs a day, over 44,000 a year US aggression gets worse with each President and is the Elephant in the roomQuote:
Originally Posted by walrusWould u rather we start bombing more shit like the last three who spoke much betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Nobody talks about it and so it carries on and now you and all the Trump fans have convinced yourself it is not even happening :-\ ;D
"The United States Government, under the Trump administration, reportedly drops a bomb every 12 minutes, which means that 121 bombs are dropped in a day, and 44,096 bombs per year. The Pentagon’s data show that during George W. Bush’s eight years he averaged 24 bombs dropped per day, that is, 8,750 per year. Over the course of Obama’s time in office, his military dropped 34 bombs per day, 12,500 per year. This shows that even though American presidents are all war criminals, Trump is the most vicious of them all."
https://www.newsclick.in/us-governme...ay-reports-say
Civilian deaths have soared under Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...=.590a8ff64215
I would rather he act like a decent human being as the leader of the biggest industrial and economic country in the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusWould u rather we start bombing more shit like the last three who spoke much betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Nahhh, not importantQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterI would rather he act like a decent human being as the leader of the biggest industrial and economic country in the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrusWould u rather we start bombing more shit like the last three who spoke much betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongWell the source is Vox and they aren't all that reliable in presenting a story which is truthful. They are unashamed of being heavily slanted to the left. "It looked accurate to me"....yeah I don't doubt it did. I guess it didn't strike you as to why Judge Kavanaugh wouldn't answer certain questions (and that's ASSUMING their graph is correct) what with being the accused in that situation. For example Kamala Harris did her little grandstanding asking if Judge Kavanaugh had contact with anyone associated with a specific law firm...she said "It's a very specific question"....which yeah the question is specifically itself, however the terms are quite broad 'anyone' 'associated with' ....so runners? Clerks? Janitors? we don't know who she meant because she refused to clarify and Judge Kavanaugh even asked for a roster, she refused to provide, Judge asked for clarification and she refused. How eager to respond to a question like that would YOU be what with being in front of Congress facing penalty of perjury even if you made an innocent mistake and misremembered something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
Trump is playing along with the Democrats because he knows they have nothing....Dr. Ford the most credible....so credible that she's the ONLY ONE telling her story. 4 people have refuted her under penalty of felony perjury....do you like those odds Kirkland? Does that inspire confidence in you?
Don't believe Q, fine, I don't really care if you believe it or not....WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS...or hey you feel free to tell us all what happens, go on @Kirkland Laing tell us all what happens to Kavanaugh, to Trump, what happens in the midterms? Please DO TELL Kirkland.
Vox are one hundred percent reliable in how they present a truthful story. You can 't point to one single untruthful story they ever published. They'll have made mistakes in stories like every journalistic outfit ever but they'll have issued corrections for them. Nobody has refuted Ford's story. Out of the people at the party none of them could confirm it or didn't remember the evening at all. One of them said they couldn't remember the evening but they believed Ford's account of it.
Kavanaugh will be confirmed which the Democrats really want to happen too. It makes their voters more likely to vote and it gives them the opportunity to impeach Kavanaugh and call all the witnesses that the FBI are ignoring in this investigation. They'll make him even more famous than he is already and the avatar for a Supreme Court that will now rule permanently in favour of big business, against labour and unions, against regulation of big business and so on. At some point they''re going to have to increase thenumber of SCOTUS justices to eleven or more so Kavanaugh will give them a graphic illustration of why they have to do it.
I don't know if the Democrats will take the House in November. It's a toss up. Democratic voters don't turn out for midterms, they skew younger than average. Older than average GOP voters turn out reliably for elections. With all the gerrymandering the Democrats could win the popular vote by seven points and still not take the House.
I have no idea what happens with Trump. There's clearly some shenanigans that went on but having evidence of criminality is one thing and having proof that will go beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law is another thing entirely. What won't happen is we find out that Trump and Mueller are working together, 30 000+ deep state arrests and so on. Any criminality that is prosecutable as regards the Russia thing will all be on the Trump side of things.
The GOP aren't going to release anything either. The chairman of the committee (GOP) made this public before Feinstein did.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
He's appointed good people to positions at the Fed. All the pre election bullshit about how he was going to run the Fed a certain way turned out to be wrong and he's followed the Fed board in its advice. That's all good.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
He has however decimated financial regulation overall. Monetary policy though, he's kept his nose out and let the Fed continue to work correctly. So that's one positive thing he's done. If he does something else I'll be the first to point it out.
"Vox is 100% truthful"
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Kirkland, settle down honey, I'm not going to keep you from reading Vox and believing everything head Soybean Ezra Klein (of JournoList infamy) writes or publishes there....but I don't believe their bullshit and I'm not going to.
And nobody has corroborated them eitherQuote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
Oh and I was just going to ask you what the definition of "hearsay" was...thanks, that helps :thumb:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
Awww I like to dream too....also in America it's "labor" ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
You have "no idea what happens with Trump" but apparently "We'll see what happens" isn't something you agree with me on...well that's odd and more than a little contrarian but oh well that's what you make it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
Where did you get the idea Trump and Mueller are working together? Provide the direct source of the information if you would be so kind.