https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dom4gVeX4AIgGmt.jpg
Printable View
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DojLvbbUYAATGZ1.jpg:large
TLDR on the statement from Ford's ex:
>No fear of flying
>No history of sexual assault
>No need for 2 doors
>Cheated on him
>Ran up his credit card w/o consent
>Helped someone 'beat' a polygraph test, something she specifically said she never did in testimony.
Come now Lyle, Tut Tut....
In a shocking new development in the ongoing drama of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination, the FBI is now interviewing witnesses about an incident in 1977 when, at the age of 12, Brett Kavanaugh’s mother caught him masturbating in his bedroom.
Fierce debate has once again flared up around the nominee to the nation’s highest court, with Democrats arguing that a masturbator cannot possibly be placed on the nation’s highest court.
Diane Feinstein, citing scientific studies, told The New Yorker: “masturbation is proven to cause blindness … can we really expect a man who is willing to risk his own eyesight for a few seconds of pleasure to deal responsibly on this nation’s highest court?”
Kavanaugh’s mother refused to give comment to The New Yorker, but did confirm she had spoken to the FBI about it.
The Kavanaugh family’s neighbor at the time, Jim Strapper, contacted the FBI earlier this week to report the 1977 masturbation incident, and was subsequently interviewed by the Bureau. Strapper had knowledge of the incident because Kavanaugh himself told him about it, the former neighbor told CNN’s Chris Cuomo.
“I guess he had a guilty conscience,” Strapper said. “Sometimes, you do something like this, you just need to get it off your chest, and so Brett came to me – no pun intended.”
“Did he tell you what kind of hand stroke he was using? Was it a three-finger stroke, or a full-fisted jerk?” Cuomo asked.
Strapper said that Kavanaugh had not revealed that detail to him.
“Do you know if it was a soft stroke or a rough stroke?” Cuomo went on to ask.
“He didn’t say, but knowing Brett, I’d wager it was a real rough stroke, Chris,” Strapper told the CNN official.
“I can see that,” Cuomo said. “I can certainly see that in my mind – a real hard, rough stroke. And the Republicans want us to believe this man is fit for the nation’s highest court.”
Strapper further divulged to the FBI that Kavanaugh was stroking it to an issue of Playboy magazine, which he had paid a homeless man a dollar to buy for him to use in his disreputable act. The FBI was able to track down the homeless man, John Wallinger, a Vietnam veteran, but were unable to interview him because he is in a coma.
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that they had banned Wallinger’s account, so that if he ever wakes up from the coma, he won’t be able to spread pro-masturbation material on the social media site.
Perhaps the most shocking part of the incident was Kavanaugh’s own response. When contacted by The New Yorker for comment, he said: “Yes, I jerked off. I still jerk off. I like jerking off.” The Supreme Court nominee then went on to ask this reporter if he jerks off.
Beyond speaking to the character of the man, the revelation that Brett Kavanaugh is a masturbator could potentially cloud his ability to rule on matters regarding masturbation while serving on the nation’s highest court.
bwaaaaHAHAHA 😂 😂😂 😂
The number of private-sector jobs increased by 230,000 from August to September, according to the latest ADP National Employment Report, the highest reading since February.
In September, midsize businesses and the service sector dominated the gains, with 99,000 of the created positions in medium-sized businesses. Most of the jobs were in the service sector, which added 184,000 positions.
"At the current pace of job creation, unemployment will fall into the low 3%'s by this time next year," according the Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi.
Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a gain of 185,000 jobs in September.
In August, the U.S. added 163,000 non-farm payrolls. Monthly job gains have averaged 207,000 a month over the first 8 months of the year.
That's my point man. One is a nameless unseen individual..an ex..who 'does not want to be involved in the process or investigation' to hide behind a sheet of paper being propped up as the spoken word of righteous 'proof' and one put their face name and profession on the line before millions. As well as whatever rancid shat they have been through. But the fact is the majority of this fiasco will likely remain unsubstantiated as not only the alleged victim but anyone trying to recall High School ffs will have gaps, inconsistencies and memories mashed together. There is no firm right or wrong it will all come down to who you choose to believe and who you choose to make goofy memes of. If a woman or man say under oath they were sexually assaulted..in what sane world is that a joke. Trump seems to find it hysterical, but only after he found it credible :vd:. The division and the way it unfolded is surreal. From the 'investigation' equipped with half measure training wheels and actual finding philtered through the WH, the initial still unclear timeline release of the charge from Feinstein, POTUS inserting himself and talking out of both sides of his ranting man baby mouth yet again and the fact that two career professionals have been through the grinder..it's a shit show. Big fat stanky one. Personally the focus and concern for me is more his random temperament and stated political bias considering a judge needs to remain very much impartial and level rendering the laws of the land.Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
But unsubstantiated things from 36 years ago is OKQuote:
Originally Posted by Spicoli
The lie detector thing seems really strange. The prosecutor asked that specific question in the hearing. If she perjured herself her whole testimony should be thrown out. Very strange......sad
Shit I don’t blame him for keeping it low, these libs are in attack mode. Senators need extra security.
The fear of flying thing is 100% false. She has flown a hell of a lot in her life
Meanwhile James Baker turned state's evidence on one Jim Comey....ruh roh raggy
While Brett Kavanaugh has been celebrated as a prime student at Georgetown prep, it has been revealed that between his freshman and sophomore year in 1979, he flew to Rhodesia to work as a sniper for the white racists murdering innocent blacks during the Rhodesian Bush War, The New Yorker has confirmed.
When Kavanaugh heard of the signing of the Internal Settlement by Ian Smith in June of that year, he immediately boarded a plane bound for South Africa, where he crossed the border into what is now Zimbabwe with a plan to “kill as many Africa Americans as possible and defend the global supremacy of the white race.”
Multiple sources confirmed that Kavanaugh was known as “The Drunken White Terror,” due to the fact that he was frequently drunk on sniping missions. Despite consuming extreme amounts of Irish whiskey and often blacking out while on sniping missions, he managed to rack up 38 confirmed kills.
“He be true da nightmare came living in,” said one Zimbabwean who wished to remain nameless. “If’n you seed da man his head go pop, you knowed it be da Drinken Terror.”
Another victimized African man, who also chose to remain nameless, confirmed that beyond murder, Kavanaugh had other evil behaviors. According to this other guy, he would singlehandedly gang-rape dozens of women while blacked-out drunk, a story which further confirms other claims made against Kavanaugh with regards to his being a drunken gang-rapist.
A different guy told The New Yorker that the 14-year-old Kavanaugh burned an entire village of black people in their huts, lighting the whole place up with kerosene.
So many worthwhile candidates out there probably fit for this so very important post. You'd think if there was any reason whatsoever to doubt about the good fit of a candidate... that nominations would be withdrawn or that people would just step down. Many other candidates are nominated and eventually elected, even if by slim, partisan votes. Why the uproar with this one? Did the Dems pay and/or collude with Dr. Ford for some reason in particular? Is Kavanaugh somehow a danger to Dems in general that they would not want him in the Supreme Court? This is one of these times when it might be better to punt, and try to mount a good offensive series next time.
He would be the fifth originalist vote. He is not a progressive interpreter. The libs are scared to death, hence calling him evil and a danger to thousands of lives even before this crapola broke out. Plus he is catholic which a couple on the right already mocked saying “the dogma is strong in here” while interviewing him.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
To me, Kavanaugh winning will be better than manny Pacquiao winning the Super Bowl, World Series and Indy five hundred in one year, it’ll be great
Kavanaugh may be ~fucked~
He'll be confirmed this weekendQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Millions of feminazis will #Outrage March on the Potomac
I was hoping for Friday so I could watch it. Mitch said this weekQuote:
Originally Posted by El KabongHe'll be confirmed this weekendQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
And?Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Cloture vote is FridayQuote:
Originally Posted by walrusI was hoping for Friday so I could watch it. Mitch said this weekQuote:
Originally Posted by El KabongHe'll be confirmed this weekendQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
Though you say that in a kidding sort of way, unfortunately many will see it that way for real.
Too bad the picking of a Supreme Court justice has also become yet another partisan MMA hexagon.
Long gone are the days of finding an excellent candidate regardless of political leanings, to the point where many were voted in by landslide margins.
(Sort of how most saw GGG win over Canelo).
The dogged insistence from people wanting to see Kavanaugh voted in just reinforces how messed up the system has become. The old saying of "where there's smoke, there's fire" is almost always proven right.
Too many people are seeing this as another nauseating US vs THEM contest. Because Trump was the one who nominated him, people predictably line up in their assigned sides of the aisle.
Hopefully we're just trying to get the best man for the job in there.
IMO, Kavanaugh himself should have withdrawn, and save us all from this spectacle.
I like the way he transitioned that straight into a boxing analogy. Social media has infantilized adults. It shows that we are just animals. Think about it all these rich white people in politics with all their master's degrees in phds from Yale and Harvard and Princeton and you give them a little Twitter and a little Facebook and a little Instagram and they behave like kindergarteners on the playground.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by walrus
Though you say that in a kidding sort of way, unfortunately many will see it that way for real.
Too bad the picking of a Supreme Court justice has also become yet another partisan MMA hexagon.
Long gone are the days of finding an excellent candidate regardless of political leanings, to the point where many were voted in by landslide margins.
(Sort of how most saw GGG win over Canelo).
OK so we're just believing Dr. Ford regardless then? No evidence, no corroboration, no nothing, just a claim and that is 100% it?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Allow me to rebut this by merely mentioning a name......Emmett Till....that is allQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
As for Kavanaugh withdrawing making things easier, saving us all from this spectacle....no sir, it would only embolden the Democrats who have become slightly more unhinged than before. They're doxxing Congressmen roughly a year after a gunman attempted to kill all of them at a baseball practice. Republicans are apparently no longer allowed to eat at restaurants either...there has just been a ricin attack as well...yes yes let's appease THAT group of people :rolleyes:
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/40...dossier-before
Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.
Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.
That’s the firm used by the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secretly pay research firm Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election.
The dossier, though mostly unverified, was then used by the FBI as the main evidence seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in the final days of the campaign.
Feels
Good
Man
;D
Where there's {{{Tawana}}}, there's {Brawley}
bwaaaaHAHAHA 😂 😂😂 😂😂 😂
Yeah we can definitely go by that old expression.......ROFLMFAO
Well, Imma tell y’all what, I ain’t seen this a-comin.
And I’m not going to be convinced until it happens.
But as it sits right now: it appears the vote is going to happen and it is going to work.
Washington Post:
A pair of key Republican senators expressed satisfaction Thursday with a new FBI report, increasing the odds of Senate confirmation this weekend of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee who has faced sexual misconduct allegations.
Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), one of three Republicans who had not indicated how they plan to vote, said Thursday that “it appears to be a very thorough investigation, but I’m going back later to personally read the interviews.”
Shortly afterward, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who requested the investigation, told reporters that “we’ve seen no additional corroborating information.”
Collins, Flake and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) are the critical votes that could ensure Kavanaugh’s ascension to the nation’s highest court.
I doubt that if Flake and Collins both hit “yea,” Murkowski would do “nay,” but even if she does it doesn’t matter – if two of the three are in, that’s 50 and Pence can break the tie.
Fake News from Channel 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongOK so we're just believing Dr. Ford regardless then? No evidence, no corroboration, no nothing, just a claim and that is 100% it?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Allow me to rebut this by merely mentioning a name......Emmett Till....that is allQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
As for Kavanaugh withdrawing making things easier, saving us all from this spectacle....no sir, it would only embolden the Democrats who have become slightly more unhinged than before. They're doxxing Congressmen roughly a year after a gunman attempted to kill all of them at a baseball practice. Republicans are apparently no longer allowed to eat at restaurants either...there has just been a ricin attack as well...yes yes let's appease THAT group of people :rolleyes:
Why Kavanaugh and not Gorsuch, Lyle? If it's some kind of Democrat conspiracy against anything Trump, then why Brett and not Neil?
Maybe there's a reason I'm not aware of, and I mean that sincerely. If so, please tell me.
Why not start with the very first candidate? I mean, if we're going to make life impossible for Trump, let's start from the very beginning.
I know we're all pretty tired of these sexual accusations that are suddenly raining down on us from all sides.... all fields (celebrities, politicians, businessmen, etc). I know it's difficult to separate the real from the fabricated in cases like this.
But again I ask.... why now and why Kavanaugh?
Does this mean anybody Trump were to trot out there would meet with the same circus?
I'd like to think not.
Oh tits in July they were looking for a reason to attack him. They already called him evil. This is a info is being used to slow the vote till after the midterms. They think they are so close to having power they will attack with all they got.
Oh well carry on, then. But when they publish the Senators' reasons for voting the way they do, they should just drop the charade and not talk about personal or professional qualifications. ;) ;)
Nobody cares with Brett Kavanaugh did when he was 17 years old. Nor should it matter at this point unless it was something like murder or rape.....
You know things that people should report a lot quicker than 24 hours later let alone 36 years later the week before their "attacker" is about to be placed on the Supreme Court
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongOK so we're just believing Dr. Ford regardless then? No evidence, no corroboration, no nothing, just a claim and that is 100% it?Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Allow me to rebut this by merely mentioning a name......Emmett Till....that is allQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
As for Kavanaugh withdrawing making things easier, saving us all from this spectacle....no sir, it would only embolden the Democrats who have become slightly more unhinged than before. They're doxxing Congressmen roughly a year after a gunman attempted to kill all of them at a baseball practice. Republicans are apparently no longer allowed to eat at restaurants either...there has just been a ricin attack as well...yes yes let's appease THAT group of people :rolleyes:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime...id=mailsignout
Just making a point here that "unhinged-ness" isn't monopolized by Democrats.
I didn't say that Democrats had the market cornered on crazy....but let's be real here Tito:Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Republicans aren't harassing Democrats out of restaurants, Republicans (nor are Republican interns) aren't doxxing their Democrat Congressmen and women and also threatening to release the health information of their children oh yeah that just happened https://www.foxnews.com/politics/acc...ns-health-info, Republicans aren't shooting up Democrats (and it's not that they don't have the firearms to do so either), Republicans aren't confronting Senators getting on elevators trapping them in confined spaces, Republicans aren't going out and protesting ASKING to be arrested like Amy 'Joke Thief' Schumer.....but hey nice anecdotal find, 1 Republican arrested for THREATS not for doing something, for THREATENING to do something, wow....totally beats anything the Democrats have ACTUALLY FOLLOWED THROUGH WITH.
Also as per soon to be Justice Kavanaugh....
#1 From the Wall Street Journal:
A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford’s allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say that she believed but couldn’t corroborate Dr. Ford’s account, according to people familiar with the matter.
Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said.
The statement to the FBI offers a glimpse into how Dr. Ford’s allies were working behind the scenes to lobby old classmates to bolster their versions of the alleged incident, as were Judge Kavanaugh’s.
#2 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DouCVM3W4AAfhk9.jpg:large
‘please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, PARTICULARLY THE OFFICES OF SENATORS FEINSTEIN AND HIRONO.’
Ruh Roh Raggy
Murkowski went no
Motion carried
Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongI didn't say that Democrats had the market cornered on crazy....but let's be real here Tito:Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Republicans aren't harassing Democrats out of restaurants, Republicans (nor are Republican interns) aren't doxxing their Democrat Congressmen and women and also threatening to release the health information of their children oh yeah that just happened https://www.foxnews.com/politics/acc...ns-health-info, Republicans aren't shooting up Democrats (and it's not that they don't have the firearms to do so either), Republicans aren't confronting Senators getting on elevators trapping them in confined spaces, Republicans aren't going out and protesting ASKING to be arrested like Amy 'Joke Thief' Schumer.....but hey nice anecdotal find, 1 Republican arrested for THREATS not for doing something, for THREATENING to do something, wow....totally beats anything the Democrats have ACTUALLY FOLLOWED THROUGH WITH.
Also as per soon to be Justice Kavanaugh....
#1 From the Wall Street Journal:
A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford’s allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say that she believed but couldn’t corroborate Dr. Ford’s account, according to people familiar with the matter.
Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said.
The statement to the FBI offers a glimpse into how Dr. Ford’s allies were working behind the scenes to lobby old classmates to bolster their versions of the alleged incident, as were Judge Kavanaugh’s.
#2 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DouCVM3W4AAfhk9.jpg:large
‘please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, PARTICULARLY THE OFFICES OF SENATORS FEINSTEIN AND HIRONO.’
Ruh Roh Raggy
I won't win a battle of finding instances of unhinged Democrats vs unhinged Republicans. We both know that. I only made a point.
If your point is that Democrats are by and large unhinged and cannot civilly object to Kavanaugh's nomination for reasons that may be very valid to THEM..... then I guess we'll just agree to disagree.
Yes, there's a lot of hysteria out there against anything Trump. Promptly met by an equally hysterical pro-Trump base which is just as capable of unthinkable things and thoughts, just like the unhinged Democrats.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
I'd still appreciate these questions answered. Walrus said something about the midterms, but to me it doesn't explain why the Unhinged Democrats didn't start the fireworks with Trump's very first Supreme Court nomination.
It's an honest question. Is it something about Kavanaugh himself, that would drive the Unhinged Democrat machinery's gears turning and churning out all these drummed up charges and fake witnesses?
Were the Democrats asleep for Gorsuch?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
All I'm saying is that as it stands right now....Democrats and Lefties are the most upset and they're acting out like a child being denied a candy bar from the store it's meltdowns and temper tantrums and overall really bratty childlike behavior on a large scale. It's gassed up by certain folks, the media and Soros....but yeah Republicans get upset when they lose elections too, but they rarely ever hold mass protests and they certainly don't attack the children of their opponents in attempts to blackmail them for voting against their constituents.
Both sides have crazy folks, but only one side is playing to the extreme and it ain't the Right
Gorsuch was replacing Scalia so it was seen as a like for like swap, they didn't like that but it wasn't going to change much. Kavanaugh replacing Kennedy is seen as someone who is more of a traditionalist than someone who is wishy washy and blew with the political winds...THAT is why there's so much trouble and if you think it's bad now wait until RBG kicks the bucket, whew boy, batten down the hatches because that'll be a right shitshow if it's a Republican President that replaces her.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
I'd still appreciate these questions answered. Walrus said something about the midterms, but to me it doesn't explain why the Unhinged Democrats didn't start the fireworks with Trump's very first Supreme Court nomination.
It's an honest question. Is it something about Kavanaugh himself, that would drive the Unhinged Democrat machinery's gears turning and churning out all these drummed up charges and fake witnesses?
Were the Democrats asleep for Gorsuch?
The Democrats are extremely fearful of losing ground in the SCOTUS so much so that Kirkland Laing has suggested they pack the courts next time they attain power "At some point they''re going to have to increase thenumber of SCOTUS justices to eleven or more so Kavanaugh will give them a graphic illustration of why they have to do it." ....5-4 with Kennedy as the swing vote was not comfortable for them, but it was enough to give them hope on certain issues....not anymore.
Why not start with the first candidate? Well I don't think #1 the Democrats thought Trump would stay in power for long as they sought to overturn the entire election and #2 again it was a like for like swap, they didn't expect Kennedy to retire as he did...that REALLY made them freak out.
Why now why Kavanaugh? It's a Hail Mary play man it's why they sat on the material they have had since July.
Pretty much anyone Trump places out there Democrats will immediately oppose I guess he COULD have attempted to "make peace" and nominated Merrick Garland, but let's be honest that's not why Trump was elected. Trump was elected to choose the Justices he said he'd choose, originalists not progressives.
The first nomination, maybe they were in denial, maybe they thought they'd oust Trump before he got a second one, maybe they figured it was a like for like swap and they were keeping their powder dry for when they needed it, I don't know what they were thinking, but they fucked up big time and let me tell you this whole Kavanaugh deal has the Republican base red hot to vote and that ain't good for Democrats not at all....I mean I guess we'll see with the mid terms how this all plays out. I don't think it'll be a clean sweep for the Republicans, but I know it won't be a clean sweep for the Dems.
Let me know if I didn't answer all your questions, those were good ones and i hope my answers are sufficient
Is Trump protecting himself in the future should he be charged for something serious later down the line?