Re: Did Cotto quit (Please read first)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dizaster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
This is my last post on this subject. My criteria is very simple, "if a boxer quits in several fights then he's a quitter to me"...
I didn't call Cotto a quitter but if Cotto quits again in a future fight then definitely I will label him a quitter for it's more than once already.
Bash me if you want but that's my criteria for a quitter.
.
Let's just hope that in his next fight, if he is equally spent and beaten, he realises this point, and stands to get KO'd for all the fans.. For the critics who will DEFINETELY label him a quitter for avoiding brain damage TWICE...
I mean, avoiding brutal punishment once when you know your done, that's one thing.. But to avoid a violent demise twice when you know your legs will stay under you for more poundings to the head? Well that's just weak! That's just quitting buddy! Keep those legs under you, and keep your head in line for those punches you deserve... You stepped in there,,, you've been beaten,,, now take your punishment like a man.... You're hands can stay at your side, that's fine, just as long as your head stays up there.. Stand there like a man and let the other guy finish you..... That's what being a warrior is all about!!
I just think it's poor attitude,, and there is more that your missing in this case...
I understand where you're coming from in contrast to guys getting themselves KO'd very regularly, but you gotta look at the specifics. And the specifics of Cotto's next fight, and the fight after that.... I can't can't beleive it's as easy as saying "If Cotto loses a fight without actually being knocked out, in more then a few fights, then that would make him a quitter"... I think it's a poor attitude rather than poor opinion..
In the scenario you're presenting, the referee is there to stop the fight in order to save the boxer who cannot defend himself anymore...
(Why can't I just quit posting... ;D I'm confused... :lolhaha: )
What can I say.. You're a warrior... :)
Re: Did Cotto quit (Please read first)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dizaster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dizaster
Let's just hope that in his next fight, if he is equally spent and beaten, he realises this point, and stands to get KO'd for all the fans.. For the critics who will DEFINETELY label him a quitter for avoiding brain damage TWICE...
I mean, avoiding brutal punishment once when you know your done, that's one thing.. But to avoid a violent demise twice when you know your legs will stay under you for more poundings to the head? Well that's just weak! That's just quitting buddy! Keep those legs under you, and keep your head in line for those punches you deserve... You stepped in there,,, you've been beaten,,, now take your punishment like a man.... You're hands can stay at your side, that's fine, just as long as your head stays up there.. Stand there like a man and let the other guy finish you..... That's what being a warrior is all about!!
I just think it's poor attitude,, and there is more that your missing in this case...
I understand where you're coming from in contrast to guys getting themselves KO'd very regularly, but you gotta look at the specifics. And the specifics of Cotto's next fight, and the fight after that.... I can't can't beleive it's as easy as saying "If Cotto loses a fight without actually being knocked out, in more then a few fights, then that would make him a quitter"... I think it's a poor attitude rather than poor opinion..
In the scenario you're presenting, the referee is there to stop the fight in order to save the boxer who cannot defend himself anymore...
(Why can't I just quit posting... ;D I'm confused... :lolhaha: )
What can I say.. You're a warrior... :)
Thanks buddy for the positive reps... To those who gave me the beatings (negative reps), thank you too...
Now I can quit with my head up... ;D
Re: Did Cotto quit (Please read first)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Markusdarkus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I will only label Cotto a "quitter" or "not a warrior" if he will quit again in a future fight...
.
Im not saying he is a quitter but when the guy admits himself he "quit" why all this discussion saying he didnt! he made the right choice i dont think sane fans hold it against him move on. All these Cottos crazies throwing around neg rep for just quoting what Cotto said its completely mad. I like Miguel but his fans are a real bunch and if not careful could turn fans against Cotto just as Pacquaios fans have (not in my case) and Pavliks quite insane fans (in everybodies case lol)
Cotto fans, Pac fans, Hatton fans, the fighter has nothing to do with it. Some people are just fans of one guy and only watch the sport to see their favourite do well. Your probably semi guilty yourself with some of the garbage I've read you post regarding Calzaghe.
Re: Did Cotto quit (Please read first)
This is my last post on this subject. My criteria is very simple, "if a boxer quits in several fights then he's a quitter to me"...
I didn't call Cotto a quitter but if Cotto quits again in a future fight then definitely I will label him a quitter for it's more than once already.
Bash me if you want but that's my criteria for a quitter.[/quote]
So you're quitting:confused:[/quote]
:lol::lolhaha::rotflmao:
:lolololol::LMAO:
Now THAT was funny.
