Quote:
Originally Posted by
Manuel "Chubby" Medina
I said it before and ill say it again IF Oscar fights it will be a good fight.
I had no prefference.-if thats how you spell it.
BUT Oscar DIDNT fight back.So of course Pacman won.
Anybody can hit a punchin bag, I dont get as much credit as Pacman did for doin juzz that on that fight.
My question was...Why do people think Pacman beating Oscar de la hoya was so incredible is Oscar didnt fight back?
Any1 can beat someone who doesnt fight back, henceforth my punchin bag metaphor.;D
When I picked PAC to defeat Hoya, I'm expecting Hoya to be as good as his last 2 fights (against Forbes and PBF) prior to the PAC fight. Given that condition plus the massive size advantage of Hoya, I still picked PAC to win against that version of Hoya...
Now with this Hatton fight, I also expect Hatton to be as good as his last 2 or 3 fights (against Paulie, Lazcano and PBF). I think this version of Hatton has no match to PAC and will probably be stopped inside 9 rounds...
My PAC-Hatton prediction doesn't ride much on the fact that PAC annihilated Hoya... This prediction is based on their overall resume, skills, recent performances and physical advantages/disadvantages... If I was confident that PAC will defeat Hoya, I'm more confident that PAC will defeat Hatton... Without taking into account the result of PAC-Hoya fight, Hatton's resume, skills, etc. just simply pales in comparison to that of Hoya... Simple analogy and reasoning and it's only my own personal assessment...
.