Khan gets WBA title shot against Andraes Kotelnik - 27/6/09

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Khan is really not very good, and I'm amazed by anyone who thinks otherwise. I hear him compared to Naz, but Naz had some serious skills and a BRAIN. That's the main difference between the two.

---

If Khan wasn't very good even an old, fat, one eyed Barrera would have sparked him ;)

---

If Barrera had been operating with two eyes he would have.:cool:

Is there a particular reason you're out to pick a fight...consider you like Barrera? Just curious.

---

:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Naz was always on the floor ;D

Frank Warren just said on the radio that Khan's cut was worse than Barrera's because it was on his eye ;D .. but no-one mentions it.

Oh and no chance of the rematch ;)

---

That Warren is a scoundrel. :rolleyes:;D

You could hardly see Khan's little nick, it was nothing. Barrera had an axe taken to his head, and yet Khan's was worse because his little scratch was around the eye? Hmm. I don't recall Khan's vision being too restricted out there.

No one mentions it because it's only Warren who likes to spout utter nonsense. Unbelievable.

There should be a rematch, but The Scoundrel and The Fraud are obviously not interested. Khan has probably deluded himself into thinking his win has significance and here he is going for a belt in a weight he hasn't even fought at before. He hasn't even legitimately beaten anybody, so god knows what strings have been pulled behind closed doors. :-\

Any news on what's happened with Don Kings protest anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

If Khan wasn't very good even an old, fat, one eyed Barrera would have sparked him ;)

---

If Barrera had been operating with two eyes he would have.:cool:

Is there a particular reason you're out to pick a fight...consider you like Barrera? Just curious.

---

:rolleyes:

---

I expected more.:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Naz was always on the floor ;D

Frank Warren just said on the radio that Khan's cut was worse than Barrera's because it was on his eye ;D .. but no-one mentions it.

Oh and no chance of the rematch ;)

---

That Warren is a scoundrel. :rolleyes:;D

You could hardly see Khan's little nick, it was nothing. Barrera had an axe taken to his head, and yet Khan's was worse because his little scratch was around the eye? Hmm. I don't recall Khan's vision being too restricted out there.

No one mentions it because it's only Warren who likes to spout utter nonsense. Unbelievable.

There should be a rematch, but The Scoundrel and The Fraud are obviously not interested. Khan has probably deluded himself into thinking his win has significance and here he is going for a belt in a weight he hasn't even fought at before. He hasn't even legitimately beaten anybody, so god knows what strings have been pulled behind closed doors. :-\

Any news on what's happened with Don Kings protest anyone?

---

I know, it's hilarious, even the radio show presenters let out a hmmmm ;D

Fighters get "undeserving" world title shots all the time. That's nothing new. Money talks.. nothing else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

If Barrera had been operating with two eyes he would have.:cool:

Is there a particular reason you're out to pick a fight...consider you like Barrera? Just curious.

---

:rolleyes:

---

I expected more.:rolleyes:

---

Stop trolling or i'll ban you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

:rolleyes:

---

I expected more.:rolleyes:

---

Stop trolling or i'll ban you.

---

get off my board:mad:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Naz was always on the floor ;D

Frank Warren just said on the radio that Khan's cut was worse than Barrera's because it was on his eye ;D .. but no-one mentions it.

Oh and no chance of the rematch ;)

---

That Warren is a scoundrel. :rolleyes:;D

You could hardly see Khan's little nick, it was nothing. Barrera had an axe taken to his head, and yet Khan's was worse because his little scratch was around the eye? Hmm. I don't recall Khan's vision being too restricted out there.

No one mentions it because it's only Warren who likes to spout utter nonsense. Unbelievable.

There should be a rematch, but The Scoundrel and The Fraud are obviously not interested. Khan has probably deluded himself into thinking his win has significance and here he is going for a belt in a weight he hasn't even fought at before. He hasn't even legitimately beaten anybody, so god knows what strings have been pulled behind closed doors. :-\

Any news on what's happened with Don Kings protest anyone?

---

I know, it's hilarious, even the radio show presenters let out a hmmmm ;D

Fighters get "undeserving" world title shots all the time. That's nothing new. Money talks.. nothing else.

---

not when I stitch his lips together with piano wire.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mark TKO

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Hatton-Khan will be massive next year. :cool:

---

was just thinking that

capacity wembley send off for hatton

---

Thats what i was thinking. They'd fill Wembley no problem.

---

Yeah and they could call it the execution of Amir Khan.

Seriously, Khan wants to stay well away from Hatton. He will get mauled no doubt. Then again the closer it comes the more I think Hatton is going to destroy Pac, and that will frighten Khan away anyway.

Yeah the ODLH win now it has all settled down seems more to me like a good little fighter beating up a once great bigger fighter and getting over confident enough to try it on with someone who still has age on his side along with size and strength.

Good on Khan gettin a title shot I say.

He does not deserve a title shot at either weight, he hasnt earnt it, hes still very suspect, hasnt really proved anytihng, didnt really beat Barrera in the proper sense if were being honest, hasnt faced enough wuality and all the rest of it.

But if boxing is run in a way where people can walk into title fights without having to prove themselves 1st then why not Khan. Hes not the 1st, hes not the last. Its not his fault the rules are not set up for fairness, its not Warrens fault either.

But ofcourse true boxing fans know the facts about Khan, we know hes clearly taking advantage of a very easy route thats been opened up to him. We know theres plenty of better boxers than him in those divisions. We know about his chin, his record, the truth. We wont be blinded by him holding a belt (if he wins). And we know all about Kotelnik and how poor he is too.

But if he does win and Khan holds the WBA belt, how long before a Bradley or a Holt come to take it off him? He will have to face them surely and how longs he guna last v one of those?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ukansodoff

Good on Khan gettin a title shot I say.

He does not deserve a title shot at either weight, he hasnt earnt it, hes still very suspect, hasnt really proved anytihng, didnt really beat Barrera in the proper sense if were being honest, hasnt faced enough wuality and all the rest of it.

But if boxing is run in a way where people can walk into title fights without having to prove themselves 1st then why not Khan. Hes not the 1st, hes not the last. Its not his fault the rules are not set up for fairness, its not Warrens fault either.

But ofcourse true boxing fans know the facts about Khan, we know hes clearly taking advantage of a very easy route thats been opened up to him. We know theres plenty of better boxers than him in those divisions. We know about his chin, his record, the truth. We wont be blinded by him holding a belt (if he wins). And we know all about Kotelnik and how poor he is too.

But if he does win and Khan holds the WBA belt, how long before a Bradley or a Holt come to take it off him? He will have to face them surely and how longs he guna last v one of those?

---

I reckon he'd beat Bradley and Holt to be honest. I see your point though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smashup

Just in from Frank Warrens site...So much for listening to Mr Roach's advice and having a few more tune ups then:-X

Wonder who's decision this was?

Frank or Amir.?

KHAN GETS WORLD TITLE FIGHT! � Frank Warren TV News

---

Why is Khan deserving of a title shot?...is he even a top 5 contender in any weight class?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rjj tszyu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mark TKO

was just thinking that

capacity wembley send off for hatton

---

Thats what i was thinking. They'd fill Wembley no problem.

---

Yeah and they could call it the execution of Amir Khan.

Seriously, Khan wants to stay well away from Hatton. He will get mauled no doubt. Then again the closer it comes the more I think Hatton is going to destroy Pac, and that will frighten Khan away anyway.

---

I see it the other way around... Khan's sparring partner and buddy, PAC will inflict the worst beating on Hatton and ruined, softened Hatton thus ready for Khan's taking...

I do agree that even with Hatton's brutal loss to PAC, Khan vs. Hatton at Wembley will still be a very huge boxing event...
.