Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.
But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.
So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.
And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."
OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.
You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:
Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.
Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:
The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...
It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...
The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.
But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.
So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.
Can you still neg rep someone on ignore?
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quinito
You guys need to understand that it's really hard to talk about Cotto, Floyd, Marquez, Hatton, or any fighter from 135 to 147 without bringing up Pacquiao's name.
That's why when in a few days ago there was some thread about Cotto-Pac or something we didn't move it from the main board. We know that's an issue with having a separate Manny board.
I'm not sure how relevant that was to all of this.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.
But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.
So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.
It's your call mate... got no problem with that... anyway, I seldom interact with you... you seems to be ignoring me ever since... joke ;D
.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.
You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:
Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.
Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:
The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...
The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.
So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
He constantly starts this stuff. You can tell from the titles and polls that the stuff is random and inherently bound to provoke harsh responses. Maybe these threads shouldn't be being started to begin with. That is the root of the problem here. All of these threads end up getting moved or put into Spam. There is a pattern here.
You could argue that peoples responses are too strong. But when the matador is waving his red towel around people are bound to see red. It's getting old.
Then tell me what's the problem with my poll? It's a legit question, JMM facing PBF now might face Cotto later...
.
I pointed out the inconsistencies earlier on this thread and also on the other thread on the main board. Perhaps you overlooked them.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:
Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.
Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:
The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...
The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.
So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be
your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.
Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...
Hope you get it now...
.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...
The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.
So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be
your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.
Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...
Hope you get it now...
.
And then you put a JMM-Cotto fight at 147. THATS THE FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Look I am going to bed, your stamina is remarkable......that is one thing about PAC fans, they have stamina.
I can't believe I have been arguing with a turnip. However, I don't blame you for your shortcomings on the board Xaduboxer. I think you are either very smart and biased or really dumb.
And I don't think you are very smart.
However, you have kept us entertained on a pretty slow night in one way or another. Like a 2 dollar hooker....you get what you pay for.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.
Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...
Hope you get it now...
.
And then you put a JMM-Cotto fight at 147. THATS THE FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.
Look I am going to bed, your stamina is remarkable......that is one thing about PAC fans, they have stamina.
I can't believe I have been arguing with a turnip. However, I don't blame you for your shortcomings on the board Xaduboxer. I think you are either very smart and biased or really dumb.
And I don't think you are very smart.
However, you have kept us entertained on a pretty slow night in one way or another. Like a 2 dollar hooker....you get what you pay for.
You're so dumb if you're thinking it's my time to sleep too...;D
"JMM-Cotto at 147" is a possibility that why it's there... It even got 2 votes... BTW I voted for 143...
You've been protesting that option coz you relate it to the other poll... Those 2 polls not related at all ... 2 separate and different polls...
.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boozeboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.
But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.
So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.
Can you still neg rep someone on ignore?
Not that I am aware of, but so far so good for me. Now if you guys would stop quoting him, that would be one step better :p
I understand what ya all are saying regarding the neg. repping him, and even suggested it myself before, we unite and mass neg rep him...but that is a negative response too, the thing they crave. So I'm going to leave it at that. I think it is the best option, others may not agree, but it is the one I'm going with.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Damn Booze...You gave him $2?! I would say he's one of those that do it for free, as long as you know who Pac is...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...:(
Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage? ;)
.
Wow....Spam-boxer is falling off ??? .Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties
Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...
Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.
Me attacking you more lately? I think everyone has been attacking you more lately...
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
C-Lo
Damn Booze...You gave him $2?! I would say he's one of those that do it for free, as long as you know who Pac is...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Wow....Spam-boxer is falling off ??? .Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties
Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...
Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.
Me attacking you more lately? I think everyone has been attacking you more lately...
Others are the usual suspects... Yours kind of just lately... Maybe I overlooked your earlier attacks... ;)
.
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
C-Lo
Damn Booze...You gave him $2?! I would say he's one of those that do it for free, as long as you know who Pac is...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XaduBoxer
Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...
Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.
Me attacking you more lately? I think everyone has been attacking you more lately...
Others are the usual suspects... Yours kind of just lately... Maybe I overlooked your earlier attacks... ;)
.
At first I thought you were ok, you always kept us updated on Pac. And when I doubted him, you made me think otherwise.
But then I gradually saw more and more how you really were. I guess it took me a while to figure out. You are manipulative, you know nothing about boxing, you avoid certain comments or sidestep them when people have you backed into a corner, you're basically like Moono who was forced out of the forum.
Either way, you're a tool now and will probably never get away from that because everyone here thinks you're a joke. Maybe you do like hearing this from people? Maybe you get your jollies by working people up? But the thing is, I like making fun of people especially when it's warrented. So if you like it when people talk about you, you're in luck!
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
heavyweight
i wanna see 2 fat f*cks beat on eachother
the victor could have a winner takes all flabking showdown with arreola with the victor promised an unlimited supply of slimjims for the year ;D;D;D
